Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Advances in atomic theory

Published Nov 1, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812795014_0005

Related papers

Advancing the Theory of the Hydrogen Atom

Peter J. Mohr

Journal of Research (NIST JRES) -•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

New Methods and Concepts in Atomic Theory

Jagdish Mehra, Helmut Rechenberg

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1982•0 citations

New Methods and Concepts in Atomic Theory

Jagdish Mehra, Helmut Rechenberg

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1982•0 citations

Advances in the Theory of Gas-Cell Atomic Frequency Standards

James C. Camparo

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

The Arrival of Bohr’s Atomic Theory

David K. Ferry

The aim of Niels Bohr’s “great” paper was to try to explain how Ernest Rutherford’s planetary model of the atom could exist. Bohr never used the words “quantum jump” in the paper, but it became very much in vogue shortly after this. Max Planck and even A. Einstein had not yet made the full evolution beyond classical physics, and the purely classical atomic views of Rutherford and H. Nagaoka did not provide the explanation of the absorption and emission spectra of hydrogen. In truth, Bohr’s “theory” consisted of a very few equations, with very great assumptions. As de Broglie’s work became known, he was hailed for his advances and he would join the list of Nobel Prizes for advances in quantum theory. Wolfgang Pauli did not particularly like the wave and particle approach that de Broglie introduced with his pilot waves in 1924, and would forcefully express these objections a few years later at the Solvay conference.

•Jan 2, 2019•0 citations

New atomic theory : a proposal

Luiz G. Spoladore

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations
The aim of Niels Bohr’s “great” paper was to try to explain how Ernest Rutherford’s planetary model of the atom could exist. Bohr never used the words “quantum jump” in the paper, but it became very much in vogue shortly after this. Max Planck and even A. Einstein had not yet made the full evolution beyond classical physics, and the purely classical atomic views of Rutherford and H. Nagaoka did not provide the explanation of the absorption and emission spectra of hydrogen. In truth, Bohr’s “theory” consisted of a very few equations, with very great assumptions. As de Broglie’s work became known, he was hailed for his advances and he would join the list of Nobel Prizes for advances in quantum theory. Wolfgang Pauli did not particularly like the wave and particle approach that de Broglie introduced with his pilot waves in 1924, and would forcefully express these objections a few years later at the Solvay conference.