Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks

Quantum Mechanics and Emergence

Seth Lloyd

Published Sep 1, 2008• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9781848162556_0002

Related papers

On the semiclassical limit of emergent quantum mechanics, as a classical thermodynamics of irreversible processes in the linear regime

Milton H. Perea

Motivated by the conceptual problems concerning the quantisation of gravity, the Dutch theoretical physicist G. 't Hooft (1999 Nobel prize in physics) put forward the notion that quantum mechanics must be the emergent theory of some underlying, deterministic theory.This proposal usually goes by the name quantum mechanics as an emergent phenomenon.This research line, initiated by 't Hooft in the late 1990's, has been the subject of intense research over the last 15 years, by 't Hooft himself as well as by many other researchers.In this PhD thesis we present our own approach to quantum mechanics as an emergent phenomenon.According to the emergence paradigm for quantum mechanics, information-loss effects in the underlying deterministic theory lead to the arrangement of states of the latter into equivalence classes, that one identifies as quantum states of the emergent quantum mechanics.In brief, quantisation is dissipation, according to 't Hooft.Moreover it has been argued in the literature that, in the presence of weak gravitational fields, quantum effects must be indistinguishable from thermal effects.Since the latter are typically dissipative in nature, the presence of a weak gravitational field should provide a framework in which quantum effects can be explained as due to thermal, dissipative fluctuations.Furthermore, since gravitational effects can be locally gauged away (thanks to the equivalence principle), there should exist some kind of equivalence principle for quantum effects, i.e., some kind of relativity principle for the notion of quantumness as opposed to the notion of classicality.In this PhD thesis we elaborate on this idea.Once a reference frame is fixed, however, quantum effects cannot be gauged away, and the statement quantisation is dissipation lends itself to a thermodynamical treatment.In this thesis we also present one mechanism whereby quantum mechanics is seen to emerge, thus explicitly realising 't Hooft's proposal.This mechanism is based on a dictionary between semiclassical quantum mechanics, on the one hand, and the classical theory of irreversible thermodynamics in the linear regime, on the other.This thermodynamical formalism, developed by Nobel prize winners Onsager and Prigogine, can be easily mapped into that of semiclassical quantum mechanics. Chapter 3Emergent QM as a thermal ensemble This chapter is based on the article Emergent Quantum Mechanics as a Thermal Ensemble, by P.

•Sep 4, 2015•0 citations

Emergence, reduction and quantum mechanics

Thierry Paul, Sébastien Poinat

•Dec 9, 2010•0 citations

Emergence from irreversibility

P Fernández de Córdoba, J M Isidro, Milton H Perea

The emergent nature of quantum mechanics is shown to follow from a precise correspondence with the classical theory of irreversible thermodynamics. Specifically, the linear (or Gaussian) regime of the latter can be put in a 1-to-1 map with the semiclassical approximation to quantum mechanics. The very possibility of reinterpreting quantum mechanics as a thermodynamics proves that the former is an emergent phenomenon. That is, quantum mechanics is a coarse-grained description of some underlying degrees of freedom.

arXiv:1210.7785•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 10, 2013•5 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Its Emergent Macrophysics

Geoffrey L. Sewell

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2002•167 citations

Quantum mechanics, emergence, and fundamentality

Peter J. Lewis

Quantum mechanics arguably provides the best evidence we have for strong emergence.Entangled pairs of particles apparently have properties that fail to supervene on the properties of the particles taken individually.But at the same time, quantum mechanics is a terrible place to look for evidence of strong emergence: the interpretation of the theory is so contested that drawing any metaphysical conclusions from it is risky at best.I run through the standard argument for strong emergence based on entanglement, and show how it rests on shaky assumptions concerning the ontology of the quantum world.In particular, I consider two objections: that the argument involves Bell's theorem, whose premises are often rejected, and that the argument rests on a contested account of parts and wholes.I respond to both objections, showing that, with some important caveats, the argument for emergence based on quantum mechanics remains intact.

Philosophica•Jan 2, 2017•1 citation

Quantum Mechanics and Reality

Princeton University Press eBooks•Jan 12, 2021•31 citations
Motivated by the conceptual problems concerning the quantisation of gravity, the Dutch theoretical physicist G. 't Hooft (1999 Nobel prize in physics) put forward the notion that quantum mechanics must be the emergent theory of some underlying, deterministic theory.This proposal usually goes by the name quantum mechanics as an emergent phenomenon.This research line, initiated by 't Hooft in the late 1990's, has been the subject of intense research over the last 15 years, by 't Hooft himself as well as by many other researchers.In this PhD thesis we present our own approach to quantum mechanics as an emergent phenomenon.According to the emergence paradigm for quantum mechanics, information-loss effects in the underlying deterministic theory lead to the arrangement of states of the latter into equivalence classes, that one identifies as quantum states of the emergent quantum mechanics.In brief, quantisation is dissipation, according to 't Hooft.Moreover it has been argued in the literature that, in the presence of weak gravitational fields, quantum effects must be indistinguishable from thermal effects.Since the latter are typically dissipative in nature, the presence of a weak gravitational field should provide a framework in which quantum effects can be explained as due to thermal, dissipative fluctuations.Furthermore, since gravitational effects can be locally gauged away (thanks to the equivalence principle), there should exist some kind of equivalence principle for quantum effects, i.e., some kind of relativity principle for the notion of quantumness as opposed to the notion of classicality.In this PhD thesis we elaborate on this idea.Once a reference frame is fixed, however, quantum effects cannot be gauged away, and the statement quantisation is dissipation lends itself to a thermodynamical treatment.In this thesis we also present one mechanism whereby quantum mechanics is seen to emerge, thus explicitly realising 't Hooft's proposal.This mechanism is based on a dictionary between semiclassical quantum mechanics, on the one hand, and the classical theory of irreversible thermodynamics in the linear regime, on the other.This thermodynamical formalism, developed by Nobel prize winners Onsager and Prigogine, can be easily mapped into that of semiclassical quantum mechanics. Chapter 3Emergent QM as a thermal ensemble This chapter is based on the article Emergent Quantum Mechanics as a Thermal Ensemble, by P.
The emergent nature of quantum mechanics is shown to follow from a precise correspondence with the classical theory of irreversible thermodynamics. Specifically, the linear (or Gaussian) regime of the latter can be put in a 1-to-1 map with the semiclassical approximation to quantum mechanics. The very possibility of reinterpreting quantum mechanics as a thermodynamics proves that the former is an emergent phenomenon. That is, quantum mechanics is a coarse-grained description of some underlying degrees of freedom.
Quantum mechanics arguably provides the best evidence we have for strong emergence.Entangled pairs of particles apparently have properties that fail to supervene on the properties of the particles taken individually.But at the same time, quantum mechanics is a terrible place to look for evidence of strong emergence: the interpretation of the theory is so contested that drawing any metaphysical conclusions from it is risky at best.I run through the standard argument for strong emergence based on entanglement, and show how it rests on shaky assumptions concerning the ontology of the quantum world.In particular, I consider two objections: that the argument involves Bell's theorem, whose premises are often rejected, and that the argument rests on a contested account of parts and wholes.I respond to both objections, showing that, with some important caveats, the argument for emergence based on quantum mechanics remains intact.