Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer series in chemical physics

Measurements of the Electronic Wave Function in the Time Domain

Lambertus D. Noordam, A. ten Wolde, H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell

Published Jan 1, 1988• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-83644-2_114

Related papers

Factorization of the wave-function coefficients in configuration-interaction expansions

Stefano Evangelisti

A factorization of the wave-function coefficients obtained from configuration-interaction expansions is presented. For this purpose, the system orbitals are partitioned into a set of overlapping domains and a factor is associated with a given electron distribution in each domain. The configuration-interaction coefficient of each Slater determinant is given by the product of all the domain factors that are associated with this determinant. This expansion is asymptotically exact, which means that the exact wave function is recovered in the limit of large domains. Moreover, the number of factors needed to define a wave function has a slow growth as a function of the system size. The idea is illustrated through applications to two model systems, i.e. a collection of non-interacting electron pairs and a Néel-type wave function. A possible strategy for the calculation of the configuration factors is also briefly discussed.

Molecular Physics•Mar 20, 2005•0 citations

Understanding Electronic Wave Functions

David M. Ceperley

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Nonlinear response function for time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing

Shaul Mukamel, Roger F. Loring

A unified theory of time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing processes, which is based on the nonlinear response function R(t3, t2, t1), is developed. The response function is expressed in terms of the four-point correlation function of the dipole operator F(τ1, τ2, τ3, τ4) and is evaluated explicitly for a stochastic model of line broadening that holds for any correlation time of the bath. Our results interpolate between the fast-modulation limit, in which the optical Bloch equations are valid, and the static limit of inhomogeneous line broadening. As an example of the relationship between time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing, we compare the capabilities of steady-state and transient coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy experiments to probe the vibrational dynamics in ground and excited electronic states.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Apr 1, 1986•207 citations

Electron Wave Function Measured

Europhysics news•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Quantum diffraction of wave function in time-domain

YongFang Li, LiQing Ren, Ruiqiong Ma +4 more

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•May 19, 2009•3 citations

Measurements in quantum mechanics

Henry Margenau

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1963•113 citations
A factorization of the wave-function coefficients obtained from configuration-interaction expansions is presented. For this purpose, the system orbitals are partitioned into a set of overlapping domains and a factor is associated with a given electron distribution in each domain. The configuration-interaction coefficient of each Slater determinant is given by the product of all the domain factors that are associated with this determinant. This expansion is asymptotically exact, which means that the exact wave function is recovered in the limit of large domains. Moreover, the number of factors needed to define a wave function has a slow growth as a function of the system size. The idea is illustrated through applications to two model systems, i.e. a collection of non-interacting electron pairs and a Néel-type wave function. A possible strategy for the calculation of the configuration factors is also briefly discussed.
A unified theory of time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing processes, which is based on the nonlinear response function R(t3, t2, t1), is developed. The response function is expressed in terms of the four-point correlation function of the dipole operator F(τ1, τ2, τ3, τ4) and is evaluated explicitly for a stochastic model of line broadening that holds for any correlation time of the bath. Our results interpolate between the fast-modulation limit, in which the optical Bloch equations are valid, and the static limit of inhomogeneous line broadening. As an example of the relationship between time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing, we compare the capabilities of steady-state and transient coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy experiments to probe the vibrational dynamics in ground and excited electronic states.