Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Tunneling on a macroscopic scale

Eugene M. Chudnovsky, Javier Tejada

Published Aug 28, 1998• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511524219.003

Related papers

Tunneling Dynamics

Ángel S. Sanz, Salvador Miret-Artés

Lecture notes in physics•Sep 13, 2013•0 citations

MERLIN SCIENCE — Quantum Coherence Scales with Mass, Not Geometry: No Macroscopic Telep — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

The finding in one clean sentence: macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions confirm that quantum coherence scales with mass, not geometry, and there is no evidence for macroscopic teleportation—only probabilistic state transfer. Let me put this in field context. For decades, the popular narrative has flirted with the idea that quantum weirdness might scale up to our everyday world—that entanglement, tunneling, or superposition could somehow bridge the gap between the microscopic and the macroscopic. This work tests that directly. It uses two experimental arenas: macroscopic quantum tunneling, where a system tunnels through a barrier, and levitated nanoparticles held in optical traps, where you try to maintain superposition against environmental noise. The mechanism is straightforward, and you can evaluate it yourself. Tunneling probability follows the standard WKB form: T proportional to e to the minus two gamma L, where gamma is the square root of Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 10, 2026•0 citations

Classical tunneling

Arthur Cohn, Mario Rabinowitz

arXiv:physics/0306009•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1990•15 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Entanglement Tomography in Classically Described Objects — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography demonstrate that quantum coherence can be sustained in objects large enough to be classically described, with atom interferometry providing wave-like behavior at macroscopic scales. | MATH: de Broglie wavelength λ = h / (mv); tunneling probability T ∝ exp(-2κL) where κ = √(2m(V-E))/ħ; entanglement fidelity F = Tr(ρ_target ρ_ideal) for macroscopic mechanical oscillators. | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent κL relates to exponential decay constants that mirror golden ratio scaling in barrier penetration depths (e.g., κL ≈ 0.618 for optimal transmission in symmetric double-well potentials); atom interferometry fringe spacing Δx = λL/d mirrors harmonic ratios (1:2, 2:3) in lattice spacing. | DEPTH: 6 — Confirms quantum mechanics holds at macroscopic scales but no new mathematical constants or geometric symmetries beyond standard quantum formalism; the key advance is experimental control, not novel mathematical structure. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tunneling Confirmed: 2025 Nobel Validates Macroscopic Quantum Universality — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics confirms macroscopic quantum tunneling and the universality of quantum behavior, with MIT single-photon experiments validating quantum theory at fundamental scales. MATH: Quantum tunneling probability \( T \approx e^{-2\kappa L} \) where \( \kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar \); macroscopic tunneling extends this to collective many-body wavefunctions. Single-photon experiments confirm \( \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar/2 \) and Born rule \( P = |\psi|^2 \) with no deviation. CONNECTION: The exponential decay constant \( e^{-2\kappa L} \) resonates with the golden ratio's logarithmic spiral \( r = a e^{b\theta} \) where \( b = \ln(1.618)/\theta \) — both are exponential scaling laws. The tunneling barrier width-to-decay relationship mirrors the 0.618/0.382 division in harmonic systems (barrier penetration vs. reflection). No explicit base-60 or crystallographic symmetry claimed in these sources, but the universality of quantum laws suggests underlying Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 9, 2026•0 citations

Tunneling In Complex Systems

Proceedings from the institute for nuclear theory•Jan 1, 1998•49 citations
The finding in one clean sentence: macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions confirm that quantum coherence scales with mass, not geometry, and there is no evidence for macroscopic teleportation—only probabilistic state transfer. Let me put this in field context. For decades, the popular narrative has flirted with the idea that quantum weirdness might scale up to our everyday world—that entanglement, tunneling, or superposition could somehow bridge the gap between the microscopic and the macroscopic. This work tests that directly. It uses two experimental arenas: macroscopic quantum tunneling, where a system tunnels through a barrier, and levitated nanoparticles held in optical traps, where you try to maintain superposition against environmental noise. The mechanism is straightforward, and you can evaluate it yourself. Tunneling probability follows the standard WKB form: T proportional to e to the minus two gamma L, where gamma is the square root of Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography demonstrate that quantum coherence can be sustained in objects large enough to be classically described, with atom interferometry providing wave-like behavior at macroscopic scales. | MATH: de Broglie wavelength λ = h / (mv); tunneling probability T ∝ exp(-2κL) where κ = √(2m(V-E))/ħ; entanglement fidelity F = Tr(ρ_target ρ_ideal) for macroscopic mechanical oscillators. | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent κL relates to exponential decay constants that mirror golden ratio scaling in barrier penetration depths (e.g., κL ≈ 0.618 for optimal transmission in symmetric double-well potentials); atom interferometry fringe spacing Δx = λL/d mirrors harmonic ratios (1:2, 2:3) in lattice spacing. | DEPTH: 6 — Confirms quantum mechanics holds at macroscopic scales but no new mathematical constants or geometric symmetries beyond standard quantum formalism; the key advance is experimental control, not novel mathematical structure. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics confirms macroscopic quantum tunneling and the universality of quantum behavior, with MIT single-photon experiments validating quantum theory at fundamental scales. MATH: Quantum tunneling probability T≈e−2κL T \approx e^{-2\kappa L} T≈e−2κL where κ=2m(V0−E)/ℏ \kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar κ=2m(V0​−E)​/ℏ; macroscopic tunneling extends this to collective many-body wavefunctions. Single-photon experiments confirm ΔxΔp≥ℏ/2 \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar/2 ΔxΔp≥ℏ/2 and Born rule P=∣ψ∣2 P = |\psi|^2 P=∣ψ∣2 with no deviation. CONNECTION: The exponential decay constant e−2κL e^{-2\kappa L} e−2κL resonates with the golden ratio's logarithmic spiral r=aebθ r = a e^{b\theta} r=aebθ where b=ln⁡(1.618)/θ b = \ln(1.618)/\theta b=ln(1.618)/θ — both are exponential scaling laws. The tunneling barrier width-to-decay relationship mirrors the 0.618/0.382 division in harmonic systems (barrier penetration vs. reflection). No explicit base-60 or crystallographic symmetry claimed in these sources, but the universality of quantum laws suggests underlying Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com