Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Student mathematical library

Systems of many particles. The identity principle

L. D. Faddeev, O. Yakubovskiĭ

Published Mar 9, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1090/stml/047/48

Related papers

Quarticles and the Identity of Indiscernibles

Nick Huggett

The principle of the identity of indiscernibles (PII) states that if two systems are qualitatively identical then they are logically identical. French and Redhead (1988) and Butterfield (1993) have shown the sense in which bosons and fermions violate the PII, but did not investigate the issue for particles of other kinds of statistics: i.e., for the (p,q) particles -- or `quarticles' -- of Hartle, Stolt and Taylor (1970). This paper shows that for any type of indistinguishable quarticle the PII is violated but that for distinguishable quarticles there are states in which it is violated by any pair of particles, states in which it is violated only by some pairs of particles and states in which it is violated by no pairs of particles. The updated version corrects a minor statement of mathematical fact, and provides a short proof for a conjecture made in the original.

arXiv:quant-ph/0208010•Aug 1, 2002•17 citations

Systems of Many Particles

Eugen Fick, Günter Sauermann

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited

Robert C. Hilborn, Candice L. Yuca

The treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics rests on two (related) principles: the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate. In light of recent theories (such as q‐deformed commutators) that allow for ‘small’ violations of the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate, we revisit the issue of how quantum mechanics deals with identical particles and how it supports or fails to support various philosophical stances concerning individuality. As a consequence of the expanded possibilities for quantum statistics, we argue that permutation symmetry is best formulated as a formal property of the state function describing the system of particles rather than as a property of the individual particles.1 Introduction2 Philosophical background2.1 Important terminology2.1.1 Identity2.1.2 Indistinguishability2.1.3 Indiscernibility2.2 When are particles indistinguishable?2.3 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and quantum mechanics2.4 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and logic2.5 Particle history2.6 Transcendental individuality3 Some quantum formalism3.1 The Principle of Permutation Invariance and the Symmetrization Postulate3.2 The configuration‐space approach3.3 Commutators and anticommutators, and identical particle statistics3.4 Q‐mutators4 Identical particle statistics: a holistic point of view5 Conclusions

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Sep 1, 2002•20 citations

Systems of Many Particles

Russell K. Hobbie, Bradley John Roth

Springer eBooks•Sep 8, 2007•0 citations

Systems of identical particles

Donald D. Fitts

The postulates 1 to 6 of quantum mechanics as stated in Sections 3.7 and 7.2 apply to multi-particle systems provided that each of the particles is distinguishable from the others. For example, the nucleus and the electron in a hydrogen-like atom are readily distinguishable by their differing masses and charges. When a system contains two or more identical particles, however, postulates 1 to 6 are not sufficient to predict the properties of the system. These postulates must be augmented by an additional postulate. This chapter introduces this new postulate and discusses its consequences. Permutations of identical particles Particles are identical if they cannot be distinguished one from another by any intrinsic property, such as mass, charge, or spin. There does not exist, in fact and in principle, any experimental procedure which can identify any one of the particles. In classical mechanics, even though all particles in the system may have the same intrinsic properties, each may be identified, at least in principle, by its precise trajectory as governed by Newton's laws of motion. This identification is not possible in quantum theory because each particle does not possess a trajectory; instead, the wave function gives the probability density for finding the particle at each point in space. When a particle is found to be in some small region, there is no way of determining either theoretically or experimentally which particle it is.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 26, 1999•0 citations

Systems of Particles

K. Tamvakis

Undergraduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
The principle of the identity of indiscernibles (PII) states that if two systems are qualitatively identical then they are logically identical. French and Redhead (1988) and Butterfield (1993) have shown the sense in which bosons and fermions violate the PII, but did not investigate the issue for particles of other kinds of statistics: i.e., for the (p,q) particles -- or `quarticles' -- of Hartle, Stolt and Taylor (1970). This paper shows that for any type of indistinguishable quarticle the PII is violated but that for distinguishable quarticles there are states in which it is violated by any pair of particles, states in which it is violated only by some pairs of particles and states in which it is violated by no pairs of particles. The updated version corrects a minor statement of mathematical fact, and provides a short proof for a conjecture made in the original.
The treatment of identical particles in quantum mechanics rests on two (related) principles: the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate. In light of recent theories (such as q‐deformed commutators) that allow for ‘small’ violations of the spin‐statistics connection and the Symmetrization Postulate, we revisit the issue of how quantum mechanics deals with identical particles and how it supports or fails to support various philosophical stances concerning individuality. As a consequence of the expanded possibilities for quantum statistics, we argue that permutation symmetry is best formulated as a formal property of the state function describing the system of particles rather than as a property of the individual particles.1 Introduction2 Philosophical background2.1 Important terminology2.1.1 Identity2.1.2 Indistinguishability2.1.3 Indiscernibility2.2 When are particles indistinguishable?2.3 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and quantum mechanics2.4 The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles and logic2.5 Particle history2.6 Transcendental individuality3 Some quantum formalism3.1 The Principle of Permutation Invariance and the Symmetrization Postulate3.2 The configuration‐space approach3.3 Commutators and anticommutators, and identical particle statistics3.4 Q‐mutators4 Identical particle statistics: a holistic point of view5 Conclusions
The postulates 1 to 6 of quantum mechanics as stated in Sections 3.7 and 7.2 apply to multi-particle systems provided that each of the particles is distinguishable from the others. For example, the nucleus and the electron in a hydrogen-like atom are readily distinguishable by their differing masses and charges. When a system contains two or more identical particles, however, postulates 1 to 6 are not sufficient to predict the properties of the system. These postulates must be augmented by an additional postulate. This chapter introduces this new postulate and discusses its consequences. Permutations of identical particles Particles are identical if they cannot be distinguished one from another by any intrinsic property, such as mass, charge, or spin. There does not exist, in fact and in principle, any experimental procedure which can identify any one of the particles. In classical mechanics, even though all particles in the system may have the same intrinsic properties, each may be identified, at least in principle, by its precise trajectory as governed by Newton's laws of motion. This identification is not possible in quantum theory because each particle does not possess a trajectory; instead, the wave function gives the probability density for finding the particle at each point in space. When a particle is found to be in some small region, there is no way of determining either theoretically or experimentally which particle it is.