Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Analysis on the Running Time of the Generalized Quantum Search Hamiltonian : $O(N^{1/4})$ and O(1) Time Resources

Joonwoo Bae, Younghun Kwon

Published Apr 16, 2002• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Farhi et al. suggested the analogue quantum search Hamiltonian and Fenner also proposed the intuitive quantum search Hamiltonian. Recently the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian containning hamiltonians of Farhi et al. and Fenner was presented in quant-ph/0110020. In this letter, we analyze the running time of the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian. Our analysis displays two surprising results. The first is the exponential speedup(T = O(N 1/4)), and the next O(1) time resource. In 1996, Farhi et al. suggested the analogue quantum search algorithm based on Hamiltonian evolution.[1] The Hamiltonian to solve the search problem is Haf = Ed(|w〉〈w|+|ψ〉〈ψ|). In the Hamiltonian Haf, |w 〉 is the target state that we have to find, |ψ 〉 is the initial state that is a superposition of N states, E is a constant in unit of energy, and d is a constant. Fenner [2] also proposed the quantum search Hamiltonian Hif = −2iEx(|w〉〈ψ | − |ψ〉〈w|), where x = 〈w|ψ 〉 ≈ 1 √. The Hamiltonian Hif is called the intuitive quantum search Hamil-N tonian. Recently, the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian including hamiltonians of Farhi et al. and Fenner was presented.[3] The Hamiltonian is as follows: Hyj = E[d(|w〉〈w | + |ψ〉〈ψ|) + r(e iφ |w〉〈ψ | + e −iφ |ψ〉〈w|)] (1) where, r is a constant, and φ is a phase. The initial state can be written as |ψ 〉 = x|w 〉 + √ 1 − x 2 |β〉, where |β 〉 is the orthogonal complement of the state |w〉. If the phase is given by φ = nπ(n is an integer), then the Hamiltonian finds the target state with probability one, but if not, the probability to find the target becomes 1 − O(x 2) ≈ 1 − O(1/N).

Related papers

Speedup in Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm

Joonwoo Bae, Younghun Kwon

Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving instances of NP-complete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one through the evolution. In this letter, we show a way of speedup in quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm,using the extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides the new point of view to reduce the running time. It is generally expected that quantum computation may solve the problems which are hard in classical context. Shor’s quantum factorization algorithm[1] and Grover’s quantum search algorithm[2] are the preludes to such expectation. Factorization problem, which is to factorize a large number, needs exponential time resource when a known classical algorithm is applied. However, Shor’s algorithm solves the problem with exponential speedup. Grover algorithm finds a target with quadratic speedup, compared to any known classical search algorithms. Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm was proposed by Farhi et al. and applied to solve instances of NPcomplete

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Transition probabilities in generalized quantum search Hamiltonian evolutions

Steven Gassner, Carlo Cafaro, Salvatore Capozzıello

A relevant problem in quantum computing concerns how fast a source state can be driven into a target state according to Schrödinger’s quantum mechanical evolution specified by a suitable driving Hamiltonian. In this paper, we study in detail the computational aspects necessary to calculate the transition probability from a source state to a target state in a continuous time quantum search problem defined by a multiparameter generalized time-independent Hamiltonian. In particular, quantifying the performance of a quantum search in terms of speed (minimum search time) and fidelity (maximum success probability), we consider a variety of special cases that emerge from the generalized Hamiltonian. In the context of optimal quantum search, we find it is possible to outperform, in terms of minimum search time, the well-known Farhi–Gutmann analog quantum search algorithm. In the context of nearly optimal quantum search, instead, we show it is possible to identify sub-optimal search algorithms capable of outperforming optimal search algorithms if only a sufficiently high success probability is sought. Finally, we briefly discuss the relevance of a tradeoff between speed and fidelity with emphasis on issues of both theoretical and practical importance to quantum information processing.

arXiv:2002.02242•International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Nov 12, 2019•8 citations

Driving Hamiltonian in a Quantum Search Problem

Kazuto Oshima

We examine the driving Hamiltonian in the analog analogue of Grover's algorithm by Farhi and Gutmann. For a quantum system with a given Hamiltonian $E|w> < w|$, we explicitly show that while the driving Hamiltonian $E|s> < s|$ optimally produces the state $|w>$ from an initial state $|s>$, the driving Hamiltonian $E^{\prime}|s> < s|(E^{\prime} \ne E)$ does not provide any speedup compared even with a classical computation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0111021•Nov 4, 2001•1 citation

Speedup in Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm

Joonwoo Bae, Younghun Kwon

The quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving NPcomplete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one in the evolution. In this paper we show a way of speedup in the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm, using an extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides a new point of view to reduce the running time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205048•Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Apr 1, 2003•0 citations

Singularity of Farhi-Gutmann Analog Quantum Search

LUOShun-Long, ZHANGZheng-Min

We show that the Farhi-Gutmann analog quantum search is a singular algorithm in the following sense:when the original driving Hamiltonian is perturbed slightly such that it is made of projections to the starting state and to the target state with different energies, the maximum fidelity (transition probability) between the searching state and thetarget state is strictly less than 1 over the entire evolution period, and the first time to achieve this maximum fidelity is of order √n/√1+cN, whose behavior depends crucially on whether c = 0 or not (here N is the total number of items, and the original Farhi-Gutmann case corresponds to c = 0). Moreover, when c ≠ 0 and N tends to infinity, the maximum fidelity tends to zero, and the first time to achieve the maximum fidelity tends to a positive constant! The condition for guaranteeing the algorithm's efficiency is determined explicitly.

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Singularity of Farhi–Gutmann Analog Quantum Search

Luo Shun-Long, Zhengmin Zhang

We show that the Farhi–Gutmann analog quantum search is a singular algorithm in the following sense: when the original driving Hamiltonian is perturbed slightly such that it is made of projections to the starting state and to the target state with different energies, the maximum fidelity (transition probability) between the searching state and the target state is strictly less than 1 over the entire evolution period, and the first time to achieve this maximum fidelity is of order , whose behavior depends crucially on whether or not (here N is the total number of items, and the original Farhi–Gutmann case corresponds to ). Moreover, when and N tends to infinity, the maximum fidelity tends to zero, and the first time to achieve the maximum fidelity tends to a positive constant! The condition for guaranteeing the algorithm's efficiency is determined explicitly.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•May 15, 2004•1 citation
The Analysis on the Running Time of the Generalized Quantum Search Hamiltonian : O(N1/4)O(N^{1/4})O(N1/4) and O(1) Time Resources
Farhi et al. suggested the analogue quantum search Hamiltonian and Fenner also proposed the intuitive quantum search Hamiltonian. Recently the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian containning hamiltonians of Farhi et al. and Fenner was presented in quant-ph/0110020. In this letter, we analyze the running time of the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian. Our analysis displays two surprising results. The first is the exponential speedup(T = O(N 1/4)), and the next O(1) time resource. In 1996, Farhi et al. suggested the analogue quantum search algorithm based on Hamiltonian evolution.[1] The Hamiltonian to solve the search problem is Haf = Ed(|w〉〈w|+|ψ〉〈ψ|). In the Hamiltonian Haf, |w 〉 is the target state that we have to find, |ψ 〉 is the initial state that is a superposition of N states, E is a constant in unit of energy, and d is a constant. Fenner [2] also proposed the quantum search Hamiltonian Hif = −2iEx(|w〉〈ψ | − |ψ〉〈w|), where x = 〈w|ψ 〉 ≈ 1 √. The Hamiltonian Hif is called the intuitive quantum search Hamil-N tonian. Recently, the generalized quantum search Hamiltonian including hamiltonians of Farhi et al. and Fenner was presented.[3] The Hamiltonian is as follows: Hyj = E[d(|w〉〈w | + |ψ〉〈ψ|) + r(e iφ |w〉〈ψ | + e −iφ |ψ〉〈w|)] (1) where, r is a constant, and φ is a phase. The initial state can be written as |ψ 〉 = x|w 〉 + √ 1 − x 2 |β〉, where |β 〉 is the orthogonal complement of the state |w〉. If the phase is given by φ = nπ(n is an integer), then the Hamiltonian finds the target state with probability one, but if not, the probability to find the target becomes 1 − O(x 2) ≈ 1 − O(1/N).
Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving instances of NP-complete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one through the evolution. In this letter, we show a way of speedup in quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm,using the extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides the new point of view to reduce the running time. It is generally expected that quantum computation may solve the problems which are hard in classical context. Shor’s quantum factorization algorithm[1] and Grover’s quantum search algorithm[2] are the preludes to such expectation. Factorization problem, which is to factorize a large number, needs exponential time resource when a known classical algorithm is applied. However, Shor’s algorithm solves the problem with exponential speedup. Grover algorithm finds a target with quadratic speedup, compared to any known classical search algorithms. Quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm was proposed by Farhi et al. and applied to solve instances of NPcomplete
A relevant problem in quantum computing concerns how fast a source state can be driven into a target state according to Schrödinger’s quantum mechanical evolution specified by a suitable driving Hamiltonian. In this paper, we study in detail the computational aspects necessary to calculate the transition probability from a source state to a target state in a continuous time quantum search problem defined by a multiparameter generalized time-independent Hamiltonian. In particular, quantifying the performance of a quantum search in terms of speed (minimum search time) and fidelity (maximum success probability), we consider a variety of special cases that emerge from the generalized Hamiltonian. In the context of optimal quantum search, we find it is possible to outperform, in terms of minimum search time, the well-known Farhi–Gutmann analog quantum search algorithm. In the context of nearly optimal quantum search, instead, we show it is possible to identify sub-optimal search algorithms capable of outperforming optimal search algorithms if only a sufficiently high success probability is sought. Finally, we briefly discuss the relevance of a tradeoff between speed and fidelity with emphasis on issues of both theoretical and practical importance to quantum information processing.
We examine the driving Hamiltonian in the analog analogue of Grover's algorithm by Farhi and Gutmann. For a quantum system with a given Hamiltonian E∣w><w∣E|w> < w|E∣w><w∣, we explicitly show that while the driving Hamiltonian E∣s><s∣E|s> < s|E∣s><s∣ optimally produces the state ∣w>|w>∣w> from an initial state ∣s>|s>∣s>, the driving Hamiltonian E′∣s><s∣(E′≠E)E^{\prime}|s> < s|(E^{\prime} \ne E)E′∣s><s∣(E′=E) does not provide any speedup compared even with a classical computation.
The quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm suggested by Farhi et al. was effective in solving NPcomplete problems. The algorithm is governed by the adiabatic theorem. Therefore, in order to reduce the running time, it is essential to examine the minimum energy gap between the ground level and the next one in the evolution. In this paper we show a way of speedup in the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm, using an extended Hamiltonian. We present the exact relation between the energy gap and the elements of the extended Hamiltonian, which provides a new point of view to reduce the running time.
We show that the Farhi-Gutmann analog quantum search is a singular algorithm in the following sense:when the original driving Hamiltonian is perturbed slightly such that it is made of projections to the starting state and to the target state with different energies, the maximum fidelity (transition probability) between the searching state and thetarget state is strictly less than 1 over the entire evolution period, and the first time to achieve this maximum fidelity is of order √n/√1+cN, whose behavior depends crucially on whether c = 0 or not (here N is the total number of items, and the original Farhi-Gutmann case corresponds to c = 0). Moreover, when c ≠ 0 and N tends to infinity, the maximum fidelity tends to zero, and the first time to achieve the maximum fidelity tends to a positive constant! The condition for guaranteeing the algorithm's efficiency is determined explicitly.
We show that the Farhi–Gutmann analog quantum search is a singular algorithm in the following sense: when the original driving Hamiltonian is perturbed slightly such that it is made of projections to the starting state and to the target state with different energies, the maximum fidelity (transition probability) between the searching state and the target state is strictly less than 1 over the entire evolution period, and the first time to achieve this maximum fidelity is of order , whose behavior depends crucially on whether or not (here N is the total number of items, and the original Farhi–Gutmann case corresponds to ). Moreover, when and N tends to infinity, the maximum fidelity tends to zero, and the first time to achieve the maximum fidelity tends to a positive constant! The condition for guaranteeing the algorithm's efficiency is determined explicitly.