Interference by division of wavefront. The two-slit experiment Preliminary remarks In this chapter we shall be concerned with various types of interference effects exhibited by matter waves. It might be argued that all quantum mechanical phenomena are ultimately a consequence of interference, being governed as they are by a linear wave equation. Of particular interest here is the analogue for material waves of Young's double-slit experiment in optics, a classic problem in the history of quantum theory. Feynman, Leighton & Sands (1965) state that it ‘ … has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery’. We shall also treat the process of tunnelling into classically forbidden regions, a phenomenon which also involves interference in an essential way. To observe the interference of waves issuing from a common source we must split the emerging beam into two spatially separated coherent parts and subsequently recombine them (the superposition of waves from physically independent sources is a many-body problem – see §§8.8 and 12.7). As in optics there are two methods of achieving this: by division of wavefront where, for example, a wave falls on a screen containing two apertures, and by division of amplitude in which a wave is incident on a semi-transparent barrier. Interference effects achieved by the first method, discussed in this section, have been observed for electrons (Jönsson, 1961; Lichte, 1986; Tonomura et al ., 1989), neutrons (Zeilinger et al ., 1988) and (helium) atoms (Carnal & Mlynek, 1991).
Interference by division of wavefront. The two-slit experiment Preliminary remarks In this chapter we shall be concerned with various types of interference effects exhibited by matter waves. It might be argued that all quantum mechanical phenomena are ultimately a consequence of interference, being governed as they are by a linear wave equation. Of particular interest here is the analogue for material waves of Young's double-slit experiment in optics, a classic problem in the history of quantum theory. Feynman, Leighton & Sands (1965) state that it ‘ … has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery’. We shall also treat the process of tunnelling into classically forbidden regions, a phenomenon which also involves interference in an essential way. To observe the interference of waves issuing from a common source we must split the emerging beam into two spatially separated coherent parts and subsequently recombine them (the superposition of waves from physically independent sources is a many-body problem – see §§8.8 and 12.7). As in optics there are two methods of achieving this: by division of wavefront where, for example, a wave falls on a screen containing two apertures, and by division of amplitude in which a wave is incident on a semi-transparent barrier. Interference effects achieved by the first method, discussed in this section, have been observed for electrons (Jönsson, 1961; Lichte, 1986; Tonomura et al ., 1989), neutrons (Zeilinger et al ., 1988) and (helium) atoms (Carnal & Mlynek, 1991).
3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.
The double slit interference experiment has been famously described by Richard Feynman as containing the "only mystery of quantum mechanics". The history of quantum mechanics is intimately linked with the discovery of the dual nature of matter and radiation. While the double slit experiment for light is easily undertsood in terms of its wave nature, the very same experiment for particles like the electron is somewhat more difficult to comprehend. By the 1920s it was firmly established that electrons have a wave nature. However, for a very long time, most discussions pertaining to interference experiments for particles were merely gedanken experiments. It took almost six decades after the establishment of its wave nature to carry out a 'double slit interference' experiment for electrons. This set the stage for interference experiments with larger particles. In the last decade there has been spectacular progress in matter-wave interefernce experiments. Today, molecules with over a hundred atoms can be made to interfere. In the following we discuss some of these exciting developments which probe new regimes of Nature, bringing us closer to the heart of quantum mechanics and its hidden mysteries.
Beamsplitting Interference phenomena are certainly among the most exciting phenomena in the whole of physics. In the following we will concentrate mainly on interference of weak fields; i.e. the beams contain, on average, only a few photons. The principle of classical interference is as follows: a light beam is split by an optical element, for example by a semitransparent mirror or a screen with several very small apertures, into two or more partial beams. These beams will take different paths and are then reunited and form interference patterns. The first step, the splitting of the beam into partial beams, plays a decisive role; light beams coming from different sources (or from different spatial areas of the same source) do not interfere with each other! We start our discussion of interference with an analysis of the action of a beamsplitter. To form a realistic idea of this device, let us imagine a semitransparent mirror. (Our considerations apply equally well to a screen with two apertures. We could also generalize to cases of unbalanced mirrors, with reflectivity different from 1/2, or screens with apertures of different size.) The classical wave picture can describe interference phenomena without any great effort: the incoming beam is split into the reflected and the transmitted partial wave, and each of these waves contains half of the energy. The process of splitting becomes conceptually difficult only when we think of the beam as consisting of spatially localized energy packets, or photons.
Young’s double slit experiment was called as "a phenomenon […] has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery. We cannot make the mystery go away by ‘explaining’ how it works". To study the mystery, we perform the non-crossing-slit-experiments and crossing-slit experiments and show phenomena: (1) in the same double slit or cross double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns gradually evolve to the interference patterns; (2) in the same single slit or cross single slit experiments, the non-diffraction patterns gradually evolve to the diffraction patterns; (3) in the same two-non-parallel-slits experiment, the non-wave patterns gradually evolve to the hybrid pattern (i.e., interference-pattern-embedded-in-diffraction-pattern); (4) in the same curved-double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns evolve to Seashell-shape interference patterns. The above phenomena show new mysteries that are more mysterious than that of the double slit experiments: it is challenge to consistently explain how they work. Those novel phenomena indicate that the standard theories of the double slit are incomplete. Novel experiments bring the search for the new theory of physical/quantum optics.
Young’s double slit experiment was called as "a phenomenon […] has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery. We cannot make the mystery go away by ‘explaining’ how it works". To study the mystery, we perform the non-crossing-slit-experiments and crossing-slit experiments and show phenomena: (1) in the same double slit or cross double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns gradually evolve to the interference patterns; (2) in the same single slit or cross single slit experiments, the non-diffraction patterns gradually evolve to the diffraction patterns; (3) in the same two-non-parallel-slits experiment, the non-wave patterns gradually evolve to the hybrid pattern (i.e., interference-pattern-embedded-in-diffraction-pattern); (4) in the same curved-double slit experiments, the non-interference patterns evolve to Seashell-shape interference patterns. The above phenomena show new mysteries that are more mysterious than that of the double slit experiments: it is challenge to consistently explain how they work. Those novel phenomena indicate that the standard theories of the double slit are incomplete. Novel experiments bring the search for the new theory of physical/quantum optics.
Abstract Chapter 11 introduces the essential mystery of quantum mechanics, shows how it is resolved, and then goes on to examine related phenomena. The mystery is how individual photons, not electromagnetic waves, can give rise to the interference pattern seen in the two-slit experiment. They are shown to do so because the relevant quantum amplitude is a linear combination of two terms, leading to the pattern when neither slit is identified as the one the photon went through, but collapsing to one term and no pattern if the slit is identified. Similar results are shown to occur when individual electrons are incident on the two slits, and when large molecules, which have de Broglie wavelengths, are scattered by diffraction gratings. Many other interference experiments are described, including those where a photon was shown to be in two places simultaneously and one where a photon displayed both wave and particle features.