Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks

The Dirac Equation from Scratch

Published Jul 7, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9781783266388_0005

Related papers

The Dirac Equation

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Oct 1, 2011•0 citations

Derivation of Malus' law by purely classical reasoning expressed in the language of group representation theory

G. Coddens

This work is part of a reconstruction of quantum mechanics from scratch with the aim to understand what it means. In previous work we have shown that the Dirac equation can be derived by classical reasoning just using relativity and group theory. This implies that contrary to common belief quantum mechanics (QM) is not magical or radically different from classical mechanics. It is also not incompatible with the theory of relativity but completely part of it. As the experimental violations of the Bell inequalities seem to take exception with this general scheme for making sense of QM we have scrutinized the derivation of the Bell inequalities to figure out the limitations of our approach. We were able to show that the derivation contains a logical error based on wrong modelling. In the present paper we complete this investigation by showing that Malus' law can be derived by classical reasoning using group representation theory, both for electrons and photons. This is a further, be it somewhat more indirect proof that the derivation of the Bell inequalities contains an error. But more importantly it shows that the philosophy of our approach remains intact, by proving that we can also understand Malus' law with our methods and thereby validating our approach also for this physical phenomenon.

•May 8, 2022•0 citations

The Dirac equation

Tom Lancaster, Stephen J. Blundell

Oxford University Press eBooks•Apr 17, 2014•1 citation

The geometrical meaning of spinors as a key to make sense of quantum mechanics

G. Coddens

This paper aims at explaining that the key to understanding quantum mechanics (QM) is a perfect geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra that is used in its formulation. Spinors occur naturally in the representation theory of certain symmetry groups. The spinors that are relevant for QM are those of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(3,1) in Minkowski space-time R 4 and its subgroup SO(3) of the rotations of three-dimensional Euclidean space R 3. In the three-dimensional rotation group the spinors occur within its representation SU(2). We will provide the reader with a perfect intuitive insight about what is going on behind the scenes of the spinor algebra. We will then use the understanding acquired to derive the free-space Dirac equation from scratch proving that it is a description of a statistical ensemble of spinning electrons in uniform motion, completely in the spirit of Ballentine's statistical interpretation of QM. This is a mathematically rigorous proof. Developing this further we allow for the presence of an electromagnetic field. We can consider the result as a reconstruction of QM based on the geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra. By discussing a number of problems in the interpretation of the conventional approach, we illustrate how this new approach leads to a better understanding of QM.

•Mar 22, 2021•1 citation

Real-Valued Schrödinger Equation: Rebuilding from Scratch

Kazuo Takatsuka

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

The Dirac equation

A. Mangoni

•Jul 16, 2020•0 citations
This work is part of a reconstruction of quantum mechanics from scratch with the aim to understand what it means. In previous work we have shown that the Dirac equation can be derived by classical reasoning just using relativity and group theory. This implies that contrary to common belief quantum mechanics (QM) is not magical or radically different from classical mechanics. It is also not incompatible with the theory of relativity but completely part of it. As the experimental violations of the Bell inequalities seem to take exception with this general scheme for making sense of QM we have scrutinized the derivation of the Bell inequalities to figure out the limitations of our approach. We were able to show that the derivation contains a logical error based on wrong modelling. In the present paper we complete this investigation by showing that Malus' law can be derived by classical reasoning using group representation theory, both for electrons and photons. This is a further, be it somewhat more indirect proof that the derivation of the Bell inequalities contains an error. But more importantly it shows that the philosophy of our approach remains intact, by proving that we can also understand Malus' law with our methods and thereby validating our approach also for this physical phenomenon.
This paper aims at explaining that the key to understanding quantum mechanics (QM) is a perfect geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra that is used in its formulation. Spinors occur naturally in the representation theory of certain symmetry groups. The spinors that are relevant for QM are those of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(3,1) in Minkowski space-time R 4 and its subgroup SO(3) of the rotations of three-dimensional Euclidean space R 3. In the three-dimensional rotation group the spinors occur within its representation SU(2). We will provide the reader with a perfect intuitive insight about what is going on behind the scenes of the spinor algebra. We will then use the understanding acquired to derive the free-space Dirac equation from scratch proving that it is a description of a statistical ensemble of spinning electrons in uniform motion, completely in the spirit of Ballentine's statistical interpretation of QM. This is a mathematically rigorous proof. Developing this further we allow for the presence of an electromagnetic field. We can consider the result as a reconstruction of QM based on the geometrical understanding of the spinor algebra. By discussing a number of problems in the interpretation of the conventional approach, we illustrate how this new approach leads to a better understanding of QM.