Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

The quantum ideal gas

J. P. Casquilho, P. I. C. Teixeira

Published Dec 23, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/cbo9781107284180.007

Related papers

Quantum Ideal Gas

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2011•0 citations

The Ideal Quantum Gas

RAGNAR EKHOLM, Leonard D. Kohn, Seymour H. Wollman

Graduate texts in contemporary physics•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

The Ideal Quantum Gas

Marco Merkli

Springer eBooks•Aug 17, 2006•26 citations

Correlation of Position for the Ideal Quantum Gas

G. Placzek

University of California Press eBooks•Dec 31, 1951•3 citations

New Quantum Theory and New meaning of Specific Heat of an Ideal Gas

Yoshifumi Ito, Sharif Uddin

In this article, we consider the specific heat of an ideal gas composed of monatomic molecules in the view point of the new quantum theory. Thereby we can clarify a new meaning of specific heat of an ideal gas.

Journal of Mathematics•Dec 20, 2004•6 citations

Ideal Gas Law, Quantum Thermodynamics and Pure Bound States

Francesco R. Ruggeri

In (1) the ideal gas result P V (to the power gamma) = constant ((1)) where gamma=cp/cv=5/3 is applied to a pure quantum bound state for a particle in a box with infinite potential walls and it is seen that ((1)) is a constant just as in the case of an ideal gas. This, however, depends on the result PV=nRT. {An ideal gas, however, follows from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which is linked to the equipartition theorem. The value cp/cv=5/3 reflects this. }Furthermore, T and V are distinct physical variables for an ideal gas. For a particle in a well with infinite potential walls, E=constant/LL. The energy depends only on L whereas in an ideal gas it only depends on T i.e. E=3/2 T. In this note we try to analyze why the ideal gas relationship ((1)) holds for a particle in a box with infinite walls. We also try to link the relationship E proportional to 1/LL to scaling features which ensure that S=Sp(n)+Sx does not depend on L allowing for an adiabatic transformation to keep entropy constant. (This holds for both a particle in a box and a harmonic oscillator.) We use the thermodynamical law dE=TdS-PdV and find that PV=nRT only holds in the one dimensional gas i.e. PL= constant T. In such a case we are able to justify ((1)), but not in the 3-D situation.

•Feb 11, 2022•0 citations
In (1) the ideal gas result P V (to the power gamma) = constant ((1)) where gamma=cp/cv=5/3 is applied to a pure quantum bound state for a particle in a box with infinite potential walls and it is seen that ((1)) is a constant just as in the case of an ideal gas. This, however, depends on the result PV=nRT. {An ideal gas, however, follows from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which is linked to the equipartition theorem. The value cp/cv=5/3 reflects this. }Furthermore, T and V are distinct physical variables for an ideal gas. For a particle in a well with infinite potential walls, E=constant/LL. The energy depends only on L whereas in an ideal gas it only depends on T i.e. E=3/2 T. In this note we try to analyze why the ideal gas relationship ((1)) holds for a particle in a box with infinite walls. We also try to link the relationship E proportional to 1/LL to scaling features which ensure that S=Sp(n)+Sx does not depend on L allowing for an adiabatic transformation to keep entropy constant. (This holds for both a particle in a box and a harmonic oscillator.) We use the thermodynamical law dE=TdS-PdV and find that PV=nRT only holds in the one dimensional gas i.e. PL= constant T. In such a case we are able to justify ((1)), but not in the 3-D situation.