Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Spin Hamiltonians II: Quantum

Published May 1, 2001• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814447355_0006

Related papers

Quantum Mechanical Spin

Daniel Linnemann

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Spin-Hamiltonians by means of hierarchies of group-indexed algebras (II) The eigenstates and matrix elements of the spin-Hamiltonian in the frame of the hierarchy of algebras

Stavros Thanos

Physica B Condensed Matter•Sep 1, 1994•11 citations

Calculation of spin hamiltonians of rank zero in a permutation model. II

B. A. Men', P. T. Varshavskii

Russian Physics Journal•Apr 1, 1975•0 citations

Quantum spin hamiltonians: A renormalization group study

Indrani Bose, S. Chatterjee

physica status solidi (b)•May 1, 1983•0 citations

Quantum Rotation and Spin

Otto C. W. Kong

Chinese Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Fictitious spin 1/2 operator formalism for multiple quantum NMR

Shimon Vega

A formalism is presented that describes the time behavior of the spin density matrix of a nuclear spin system with arbitrary spin in terms of fictitious spin −(1/2) operators. This formalism is an extension of that used earlier for nuclei with spin I=1. For a spin system with n eigenstates we define for every pair of eigenstates ‖i〉 and ‖j〉 three operators Ii−jp, with p=x, y, and z, according to the three 2×2 Pauli matrices σx, σy, and σz. These operators together constitute a complete set of n2−1 independent Hermitian operators, and we can write the n×n density matrix and the spin Hamiltonian of the system in terms of the Ii−jp operators. The commutation relations among the operators make it possible in many cases to solve the equation of motion of the density matrix analytically. Three examples of the use of the Ii−jp operators are presented. Firstly a system of noninteracting spins with I=1 is considered. The Ii−jp operators for this case are compared with the Iq,k operator defined earlier. The cw signal intensities of the single and double quantum transitions for the I=1 spin system are derived. Secondly a spin system with I=3/2 is described as a simple extension of the use of the Ii−jp operators. The excitation and the detection of the triple quantum coherence are discussed for noninteracting nuclei in solids. Finally the double quantum effects in a system of two interacting spins with I=1/2 are discussed.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jun 15, 1978•393 citations
A formalism is presented that describes the time behavior of the spin density matrix of a nuclear spin system with arbitrary spin in terms of fictitious spin −(1/2) operators. This formalism is an extension of that used earlier for nuclei with spin I=1. For a spin system with n eigenstates we define for every pair of eigenstates ‖i〉 and ‖j〉 three operators Ii−jp, with p=x, y, and z, according to the three 2×2 Pauli matrices σx, σy, and σz. These operators together constitute a complete set of n2−1 independent Hermitian operators, and we can write the n×n density matrix and the spin Hamiltonian of the system in terms of the Ii−jp operators. The commutation relations among the operators make it possible in many cases to solve the equation of motion of the density matrix analytically. Three examples of the use of the Ii−jp operators are presented. Firstly a system of noninteracting spins with I=1 is considered. The Ii−jp operators for this case are compared with the Iq,k operator defined earlier. The cw signal intensities of the single and double quantum transitions for the I=1 spin system are derived. Secondly a spin system with I=3/2 is described as a simple extension of the use of the Ii−jp operators. The excitation and the detection of the triple quantum coherence are discussed for noninteracting nuclei in solids. Finally the double quantum effects in a system of two interacting spins with I=1/2 are discussed.