Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena

Induced Optical Tunnelling

C. Hirlimann, Benjamin Thomas

Published Jan 1, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

François Bardou and Dominique Boosé recently published1 their discovery of a new induced tunnel effect, they named quantum evaporation. In this work they showed that, for a one-dimensional electron reflecting on an energy barrier, the stationary character of its eigen-functions could be broken under special conditions. If a small momentum is transferred to the electron at the time it reflects on the barrier, its wave-function is projected on the complete set of its stationary eigen-functions. A small momentum means that the energy transfer that accompanies the momentum transfer is negligible compared to the barrier height or at least that it does not allow for a jump of the particle above the barrier. The tunnelling probability of the electron is strongly enhanced by the momentum perturbation because the weight of the eigen-states with energies above the barrier becomes preponderant in the calculation of the tunnelling probability. This probability enhancement is independent on the sign of the momentum transfer: the electron can be pushed toward or pull out of the barrier; it only depends on the momentum amplitude in a quadratic way. The authors have showed that the momentum transfer is equivalent to a kinetic translation of the barrier.

DOI
10.1364/up.2002.tue25

Related papers

Quantum evaporation: An optical transposition

C. Hirlimann, B. Thomas

\nThis work shows experimental evidence for a new quantum evaporation effect theoretically discovered by Bardou and Boosdt. In this effect the tunnelling probability of a particle through a barrier strongly increases when a small momentum is transferred to the particle during its reflection on the barrier. In our experiment we studied the induced tunnelling of a short optical pulse on a Newton-type optical barrier.\n

Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings)•Jun 1, 2002•0 citations

A Classical Explanation of Quantum Tunneling: An Energy Transfer Model Based on Electron Collisions

Fan Xie

This paper proposes a classical alternative explanation for the tunneling effect in quantum mechanics. Standard quantum theory describes tunneling as a particle "penetrating" a potential barrier whose energy exceeds the particle's own kinetic energy with a certain probability. However, this explanation focuses only on the mathematical initial and final states, completely ignoring any dynamical process the electron may undergo before the barrier, and lacks a physical picture. This paper argues that tunneling is not an intrinsic quantum property of a single electron, but rather a collective statistical fluctuation event involving multiple electrons: electrons near the barrier, through a series of random collisions in the correct direction, gradually transfer and concentrate kinetic energy onto the electron closest to the barrier, enabling it to instantaneously acquire kinetic energy exceeding the barrier threshold and thus classically fly over the barrier. During the crossing, the electron must do work against the barrier, converting kinetic energy into potential energy; therefore, after crossing, its kinetic energy is reduced and it cannot cross the same barrier again. Tunneling probability is reinterpreted as the success probability of such a "directed energy relay" event. This model is fully self-consistent within the framework of classical electromagnetism and statistical mechanics, requiring no wave functions or probability waves, with a clear physical picture and explicit causal chain. This paper further points out that under strictly single-electron conditions, this model predicts that tunneling will completely disappear, a prediction that stands in fundamental opposition to the standard quantum model and can serve as a decisive experiment to test the two theories.

•Aug 13, 2026•0 citations

Reflection above the barrier as tunneling in momentum space

R. L. Jaffe

Quantum mechanics predicts an exponentially small probability that a particle with energy greater than the height of a potential barrier will reflect from the barrier in violation of classical expectations. This process can be regarded as tunneling in momentum space, leading to a simple derivation of the reflection probability.

arXiv:0910.4564•American Journal of Physics•May 12, 2010•14 citations

A quantum evaporation effect

D. Boosé, F Bardou

A small momentum transfer to a particle interacting with a steep potential barrier gives rise to a quantum evaporation effect which increases the transmission appreciably. This effect results from the unexpectedly large population of quantum states with energies above the height of the barrier. Its characteristic properties are studied and an example of physical system in which it may be observed is given.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103095•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jan 1, 2001•7 citations

Tunneling times and excited state interactions between chromophores

Regien G. Stomphorst

This Thesis consists of two related parts. The first part (Chapters 2 and 3) presents the results of a fundamental theoretical study of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and particularly of tunneling processes. Part two (Chapters 4, 5, and 6) describes the experimental results of spectroscopic investigations of quantum mechanical interactions between chromophores, which may play a role in electron transport by means of tunneling.The formulation of the quantum theory at the beginning of the twentieth century resulted in a scientific revolution. The impact of this theory on our physical world picture is still visible today. The quantum theory is impressively successful in its predictions of the outcomes of experiments, but the interpretation of the theory is still shaky. The predictions of quantum mechanics about the outcome of experiments are detailed and testable, but the meaning of the theory for quantum systems, in which no measurement has taken place is not clear. Various interpretations exist. Two of these are compared in Chapter 2. The first is the orthodox or Copenhagen interpretation, which was advocated by the Copenhagen-based Niels Bohr. His followers claimed that, in the orthodox interpretation, nothing can be said about the properties of systems if no suitable measurement has been carried out. The alternative is the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, in which a particle, e.g. an electron, has a well-defined position and velocity at each instant of time independent of a measurement act. The causal theory does not assign a special role to the observer. In the causal interpretation the location as a function of time amounts to trajectories. The two interpretations are empirically equivalent, i.e. they predict the same experimental outcomes.In Chapter 2 the meaning of the two interpretations is clarified by the notion of tunneling time. Tunneling is the quantum mechanical phenomenon that a particle can cross a barrier even if its energy is less than the barrier energy. The time a particle takes to tunnel is the tunneling time. Time is a confusing concept: quantum theory appears not to know how to handle this topic. Time appears in the quantum mechanical formulae as a parameter, and not as an operator that corresponds to an observable quantity. Since an unambiguous time operator is missing, it is interesting to see what different interpretations have to say about tunneling times. It is strictly speaking impossible to define tunneling times in the orthodox interpretation because of the lack of a clear time operator, of which the expectation value can be observed by experiment. In the causal interpretation, every trajectory corresponds to a possible path of an electron. The density functions determine the probability that particles move on particular trajectories. This is how the stochastic character of quantum mechanics is accounted for in this interpretation. The transmission time is defined as the time spent inside the barrier by the electrons that eventually cross the barrier. The average transmission time can be defined by means of the trajectories, both in the case of stationary wave functions and in that of time-dependent, Gaussian wave packets. The Gaussian wave packets travel from minus infinity to plus infinity. On the way they meet potential barriers, which cause them to be reflected or transmitted. The process by which an electron moves from one chromophore to another can be described as tunneling because of the high potential barrier formed by the medium between the chromophores. In this Thesis the experimental media used are polymer films and apolar solutions. The model described in Chapter 2 is generally used in the literature but appears not to be applicable for a system of two chromophores and a tunneling electron, because electrons belonging to chromophores neither start in infinity nor go to infinity. A better model, a double potential well, is used in Chapter 3. The conclusion of Chapter 2 is that the transmission time can be defined in the causal interpretation when time-dependent wave packets are used.Chapter 3 illustrates the preceding by tunneling of a particle from one potential well to another passing a potential barrier. This model is the so-called double potential well. Examples are primary charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center and in artificial model systems of chromophores in solutions and polymer films. The latter two cases are investigated spectroscopically in this Thesis. In these molecular systems, effective electron transport between chromophores after absorption of light takes place, yielding charge separation, i.e. the formation of chromophore cations. During their transport between natural or artificial chromophores, the released electrons often have to pass weak conducting media, corresponding to high potential barriers. If the energy of the electron exceeds the energy of the potential barrier, electron transport can be explained by classical theories. However, if the energy of the electron falls below the energy of the potential barrier, this is no longer possible. The transport mechanism is then understood as quantum mechanical tunneling. Experimental proof of tunneling has been found at low temperatures in photosynthesis.In Chapter 3 the chromophores and the tunneling electrons are described by double potential wells. Each well represents a chromphore and the space between the molecules a potential barrier. The formalism of the causal interpretation is applied to define a transmission time. The transmission time can be found using trajectories. An alternative method provides the average transmission time without calculating the trajectories. Arrival time distribution functions are defined and these are used to determine the average arrival time of the tunneling electrons at the entrance and at the exit of the barrier. Because arrival time distribution functions and hence both average arrival times and transmission times are not determined in an experimental context, we conclude that these definitions of transmission times are meaningless in the orthodox interpretation. The question posed at the end of Chapter 3 is whether, and if so how, these transmission times are experimentally accessible.The theoretical models developed in Chapters 2 and 3 are too simple to be extrapolated to real systems, such as electron transport between an electron donor and an acceptor, one of which is excited by light. Intermolecular interactions between excited electron donor molecules and ground state surrounding molecules cannot be neglected in chromophore films and solutions with relatively high concentrations of chromophores. These excitonic interactions should be included in adequate descriptions of electron transfer. Chapters 4, 5, and 6 describe these interactions using absorption and emission spectroscopy. In Chapter 4 a theoretical description of the absorption characteristics of chromophores in disordered films is given. At low concentrations, chromophores in films are mainly monomers. On statistical grounds, however, we conclude that some molecules are close enough together to form dimer-like structures, concentration pairs with characteristic absorption spectra. The presence of these concentration pairs influences the emission characteristics of chromophore films as well. When monomer electrons are excited by the absorption of photons, the electrons might return to the ground state, giving off their energy as fluorescence. Light energy can also be transferred to neighboring concentration pairs, in which case the fluorescence is quenched.The aim of Chapter 4 is to estimate the influence of potential quenchers in the vicinity of excited monomers and to predict the influence of these quenchers on the absorption spectra. The transfer of energy from monomers to concentration pairs, the so-called Förster transfer, takes place over quite large distances (1-5 nm). Statistics can be used to calculate the number of quenchers in particular concentrations of chromophores. In the literature it is assumed that two monomers that form a concentration pair are randomly oriented with respect to each other. If these pairs consisted of randomly oriented monomers and all fluctuations are taken into account, it appears on theoretical grounds that there would not be enough quenchers to describe the experimental changes. Because most chromophores are elongated or pancake-like, they are not randomly oriented but exhibit preferential orientations. These preferential orientations increase the efficiency of fluorescence quenching and theory and experiment are thereby reconciled. An analytical expression of the spectral changes compared to monomeric spectra of randomly oriented dimers is presented. To describe the interaction between chromophores that have one dominant transition dipole moment, a point dipole exciton model is used. To enhance the description of the spectral changes, homogeneous and inhomogeneous line broadening and monomer-to- monomer distance fluctuations should be taken into account. Inclusion of these factors in the model gives rise to the conclusion that the dimer spectra are broadened compared to the monomeric spectra and that the broadening is stronger at the blue end than at the red end of the spectra. However, to detect the blue-shifted spectral profile of randomly oriented dime-like samples, the concentration needs to be so high that isolated dimers cannot be observed. Then, simulation of the dimers becomes impossible, and all mutual interactions must be taken into account. Modeling of these interactions shows that the blue shift is not visible, and that only a broadening of the absorption spectra with respect to the monomeric spectra remains.Chapter 5 describes spectral changes that result from changes in the concentration changes of elongated Erythrosin-B (Ery B) chromophores in polyvinylalcohol (PVA) films. At low concentrations, monomers ar

Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Long journey into tunneling

L. Esaki

N 1923, during the infancy of the quantum theory, de Broglie [ 11 introducted a new fundamental hypothesis that matter may be endowed with a dualistic natureparticles may also have the characteristics of waves. This hypothesis, in the hands of Schrodinger [2] found expression in the definite form now known as the Schrodinger wave equation, whereby an electron or a particle is assumed to be represented by a solution to this equation. The continuous nonzero nature of such solutions, even in classically forbidden regions of negative kinetic energy, implies an ability to penetrate such forbidden regions and a probability of tunneling from one classically allowed region to another. The concept of tunneling, indeed, arises from this quantum-mechanical result. The subsequent experimental manifestations of this concept can be regarded as one of the early triumphs of the quantum theory. In 1928, theoretical physicists believed that tunneling could occur by the distortion, lowering or thinning, of a potential barrier under an externally applied high electric field. Oppenheimer [3] attributed the autoionization of excited states of atomic hydrogen to the tunnel effect: The coulombic potential well which binds an atomic electron could be distorted by a strong electric field so that the electron would see a finite potential barrier through which it could tunnel. Fowler and Nordheim [4] explained, on the basis of electron tunneling, the main features of the phenomenon of electron emission from cold metals by high external electric fields, which had been unexplained since its observation by Lilienfeld [SI in 1922. They proposed a one-dimensional model. Metal electrons are confined by a potential wall whose height is determined by the work function 9 plus the Fermi energy E/, and the wall thickness is substantially decreased with an externally applied high electric field, allowing electrons to tunnel through the potential wall, as shown in Fig. 1. They successfully derived the well-known Fowler-Nordheim formula for the current as a function of electric field F: J = AF* exp [-4(2nr)1'*t$a'*/3kF]. An application of these ideas which followed almost immediately came in the model for a decay as a tunneling process put forth by Gamow [6] and Gurney and Condon [7]. Subsequently, Rice [8] extended this theory to the description of molecular dissociation. The next important development was an attempt to invoke tunneling in order to understand transport properties of electrical contacts between two solid conductors. The problems of metal-to-metal and semiconductor-to-metal contacts are important technically, because they are directly related to electrical switches and rectifiers or detectors.

Proceedings of the IEEE•Jan 1, 1974•39 citations
François Bardou and Dominique Boosé recently published1 their discovery of a new induced tunnel effect, they named quantum evaporation. In this work they showed that, for a one-dimensional electron reflecting on an energy barrier, the stationary character of its eigen-functions could be broken under special conditions. If a small momentum is transferred to the electron at the time it reflects on the barrier, its wave-function is projected on the complete set of its stationary eigen-functions. A small momentum means that the energy transfer that accompanies the momentum transfer is negligible compared to the barrier height or at least that it does not allow for a jump of the particle above the barrier. The tunnelling probability of the electron is strongly enhanced by the momentum perturbation because the weight of the eigen-states with energies above the barrier becomes preponderant in the calculation of the tunnelling probability. This probability enhancement is independent on the sign of the momentum transfer: the electron can be pushed toward or pull out of the barrier; it only depends on the momentum amplitude in a quadratic way. The authors have showed that the momentum transfer is equivalent to a kinetic translation of the barrier.
This paper proposes a classical alternative explanation for the tunneling effect in quantum mechanics. Standard quantum theory describes tunneling as a particle "penetrating" a potential barrier whose energy exceeds the particle's own kinetic energy with a certain probability. However, this explanation focuses only on the mathematical initial and final states, completely ignoring any dynamical process the electron may undergo before the barrier, and lacks a physical picture. This paper argues that tunneling is not an intrinsic quantum property of a single electron, but rather a collective statistical fluctuation event involving multiple electrons: electrons near the barrier, through a series of random collisions in the correct direction, gradually transfer and concentrate kinetic energy onto the electron closest to the barrier, enabling it to instantaneously acquire kinetic energy exceeding the barrier threshold and thus classically fly over the barrier. During the crossing, the electron must do work against the barrier, converting kinetic energy into potential energy; therefore, after crossing, its kinetic energy is reduced and it cannot cross the same barrier again. Tunneling probability is reinterpreted as the success probability of such a "directed energy relay" event. This model is fully self-consistent within the framework of classical electromagnetism and statistical mechanics, requiring no wave functions or probability waves, with a clear physical picture and explicit causal chain. This paper further points out that under strictly single-electron conditions, this model predicts that tunneling will completely disappear, a prediction that stands in fundamental opposition to the standard quantum model and can serve as a decisive experiment to test the two theories.
This Thesis consists of two related parts. The first part (Chapters 2 and 3) presents the results of a fundamental theoretical study of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and particularly of tunneling processes. Part two (Chapters 4, 5, and 6) describes the experimental results of spectroscopic investigations of quantum mechanical interactions between chromophores, which may play a role in electron transport by means of tunneling.The formulation of the quantum theory at the beginning of the twentieth century resulted in a scientific revolution. The impact of this theory on our physical world picture is still visible today. The quantum theory is impressively successful in its predictions of the outcomes of experiments, but the interpretation of the theory is still shaky. The predictions of quantum mechanics about the outcome of experiments are detailed and testable, but the meaning of the theory for quantum systems, in which no measurement has taken place is not clear. Various interpretations exist. Two of these are compared in Chapter 2. The first is the orthodox or Copenhagen interpretation, which was advocated by the Copenhagen-based Niels Bohr. His followers claimed that, in the orthodox interpretation, nothing can be said about the properties of systems if no suitable measurement has been carried out. The alternative is the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, in which a particle, e.g. an electron, has a well-defined position and velocity at each instant of time independent of a measurement act. The causal theory does not assign a special role to the observer. In the causal interpretation the location as a function of time amounts to trajectories. The two interpretations are empirically equivalent, i.e. they predict the same experimental outcomes.In Chapter 2 the meaning of the two interpretations is clarified by the notion of tunneling time. Tunneling is the quantum mechanical phenomenon that a particle can cross a barrier even if its energy is less than the barrier energy. The time a particle takes to tunnel is the tunneling time. Time is a confusing concept: quantum theory appears not to know how to handle this topic. Time appears in the quantum mechanical formulae as a parameter, and not as an operator that corresponds to an observable quantity. Since an unambiguous time operator is missing, it is interesting to see what different interpretations have to say about tunneling times. It is strictly speaking impossible to define tunneling times in the orthodox interpretation because of the lack of a clear time operator, of which the expectation value can be observed by experiment. In the causal interpretation, every trajectory corresponds to a possible path of an electron. The density functions determine the probability that particles move on particular trajectories. This is how the stochastic character of quantum mechanics is accounted for in this interpretation. The transmission time is defined as the time spent inside the barrier by the electrons that eventually cross the barrier. The average transmission time can be defined by means of the trajectories, both in the case of stationary wave functions and in that of time-dependent, Gaussian wave packets. The Gaussian wave packets travel from minus infinity to plus infinity. On the way they meet potential barriers, which cause them to be reflected or transmitted. The process by which an electron moves from one chromophore to another can be described as tunneling because of the high potential barrier formed by the medium between the chromophores. In this Thesis the experimental media used are polymer films and apolar solutions. The model described in Chapter 2 is generally used in the literature but appears not to be applicable for a system of two chromophores and a tunneling electron, because electrons belonging to chromophores neither start in infinity nor go to infinity. A better model, a double potential well, is used in Chapter 3. The conclusion of Chapter 2 is that the transmission time can be defined in the causal interpretation when time-dependent wave packets are used.Chapter 3 illustrates the preceding by tunneling of a particle from one potential well to another passing a potential barrier. This model is the so-called double potential well. Examples are primary charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center and in artificial model systems of chromophores in solutions and polymer films. The latter two cases are investigated spectroscopically in this Thesis. In these molecular systems, effective electron transport between chromophores after absorption of light takes place, yielding charge separation, i.e. the formation of chromophore cations. During their transport between natural or artificial chromophores, the released electrons often have to pass weak conducting media, corresponding to high potential barriers. If the energy of the electron exceeds the energy of the potential barrier, electron transport can be explained by classical theories. However, if the energy of the electron falls below the energy of the potential barrier, this is no longer possible. The transport mechanism is then understood as quantum mechanical tunneling. Experimental proof of tunneling has been found at low temperatures in photosynthesis.In Chapter 3 the chromophores and the tunneling electrons are described by double potential wells. Each well represents a chromphore and the space between the molecules a potential barrier. The formalism of the causal interpretation is applied to define a transmission time. The transmission time can be found using trajectories. An alternative method provides the average transmission time without calculating the trajectories. Arrival time distribution functions are defined and these are used to determine the average arrival time of the tunneling electrons at the entrance and at the exit of the barrier. Because arrival time distribution functions and hence both average arrival times and transmission times are not determined in an experimental context, we conclude that these definitions of transmission times are meaningless in the orthodox interpretation. The question posed at the end of Chapter 3 is whether, and if so how, these transmission times are experimentally accessible.The theoretical models developed in Chapters 2 and 3 are too simple to be extrapolated to real systems, such as electron transport between an electron donor and an acceptor, one of which is excited by light. Intermolecular interactions between excited electron donor molecules and ground state surrounding molecules cannot be neglected in chromophore films and solutions with relatively high concentrations of chromophores. These excitonic interactions should be included in adequate descriptions of electron transfer. Chapters 4, 5, and 6 describe these interactions using absorption and emission spectroscopy. In Chapter 4 a theoretical description of the absorption characteristics of chromophores in disordered films is given. At low concentrations, chromophores in films are mainly monomers. On statistical grounds, however, we conclude that some molecules are close enough together to form dimer-like structures, concentration pairs with characteristic absorption spectra. The presence of these concentration pairs influences the emission characteristics of chromophore films as well. When monomer electrons are excited by the absorption of photons, the electrons might return to the ground state, giving off their energy as fluorescence. Light energy can also be transferred to neighboring concentration pairs, in which case the fluorescence is quenched.The aim of Chapter 4 is to estimate the influence of potential quenchers in the vicinity of excited monomers and to predict the influence of these quenchers on the absorption spectra. The transfer of energy from monomers to concentration pairs, the so-called Förster transfer, takes place over quite large distances (1-5 nm). Statistics can be used to calculate the number of quenchers in particular concentrations of chromophores. In the literature it is assumed that two monomers that form a concentration pair are randomly oriented with respect to each other. If these pairs consisted of randomly oriented monomers and all fluctuations are taken into account, it appears on theoretical grounds that there would not be enough quenchers to describe the experimental changes. Because most chromophores are elongated or pancake-like, they are not randomly oriented but exhibit preferential orientations. These preferential orientations increase the efficiency of fluorescence quenching and theory and experiment are thereby reconciled. An analytical expression of the spectral changes compared to monomeric spectra of randomly oriented dimers is presented. To describe the interaction between chromophores that have one dominant transition dipole moment, a point dipole exciton model is used. To enhance the description of the spectral changes, homogeneous and inhomogeneous line broadening and monomer-to- monomer distance fluctuations should be taken into account. Inclusion of these factors in the model gives rise to the conclusion that the dimer spectra are broadened compared to the monomeric spectra and that the broadening is stronger at the blue end than at the red end of the spectra. However, to detect the blue-shifted spectral profile of randomly oriented dime-like samples, the concentration needs to be so high that isolated dimers cannot be observed. Then, simulation of the dimers becomes impossible, and all mutual interactions must be taken into account. Modeling of these interactions shows that the blue shift is not visible, and that only a broadening of the absorption spectra with respect to the monomeric spectra remains.Chapter 5 describes spectral changes that result from changes in the concentration changes of elongated Erythrosin-B (Ery B) chromophores in polyvinylalcohol (PVA) films. At low concentrations, monomers ar
N 1923, during the infancy of the quantum theory, de Broglie [ 11 introducted a new fundamental hypothesis that matter may be endowed with a dualistic natureparticles may also have the characteristics of waves. This hypothesis, in the hands of Schrodinger [2] found expression in the definite form now known as the Schrodinger wave equation, whereby an electron or a particle is assumed to be represented by a solution to this equation. The continuous nonzero nature of such solutions, even in classically forbidden regions of negative kinetic energy, implies an ability to penetrate such forbidden regions and a probability of tunneling from one classically allowed region to another. The concept of tunneling, indeed, arises from this quantum-mechanical result. The subsequent experimental manifestations of this concept can be regarded as one of the early triumphs of the quantum theory. In 1928, theoretical physicists believed that tunneling could occur by the distortion, lowering or thinning, of a potential barrier under an externally applied high electric field. Oppenheimer [3] attributed the autoionization of excited states of atomic hydrogen to the tunnel effect: The coulombic potential well which binds an atomic electron could be distorted by a strong electric field so that the electron would see a finite potential barrier through which it could tunnel. Fowler and Nordheim [4] explained, on the basis of electron tunneling, the main features of the phenomenon of electron emission from cold metals by high external electric fields, which had been unexplained since its observation by Lilienfeld [SI in 1922. They proposed a one-dimensional model. Metal electrons are confined by a potential wall whose height is determined by the work function 9 plus the Fermi energy E/, and the wall thickness is substantially decreased with an externally applied high electric field, allowing electrons to tunnel through the potential wall, as shown in Fig. 1. They successfully derived the well-known Fowler-Nordheim formula for the current as a function of electric field F: J = AF* exp [-4(2nr)1'*t$a'*/3kF]. An application of these ideas which followed almost immediately came in the model for a decay as a tunneling process put forth by Gamow [6] and Gurney and Condon [7]. Subsequently, Rice [8] extended this theory to the description of molecular dissociation. The next important development was an attempt to invoke tunneling in order to understand transport properties of electrical contacts between two solid conductors. The problems of metal-to-metal and semiconductor-to-metal contacts are important technically, because they are directly related to electrical switches and rectifiers or detectors.