Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

The Heisenberg Magnetic Ring

Published May 1, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814350723_0008

Related papers

Multi-impurity effects on the entanglement of anisotropic Heisenberg ring XXZ under a homogeneous magnetic field

Gao Wen Bin, Yang Guo Hui, Zhou Ling

The effects of multi-impurity on the entanglement of anisotropic Heisenberg ring XXZ under a homogeneous magnetic field have been studied. The impurities make the equal pairwise entanglement in a ring compete with each other so that the pairwise entanglement exhibits oscillation. If the impurities are of larger couplings, both the critical temperature and pairwise entanglement can be improved

arXiv:quant-ph/0612111•Dec 14, 2006•0 citations

The One-dimensional Heisenberg Magnet

V. E. Korepin, N. M. Bogoliubov, Anatoli G. Izergin

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 19, 1993•1 citation

Multi-impurity effects on the entanglement of anisotropic Heisenberg ring XXZ under a homogeneous magnetic field

Gao Wen-Bin, Guo-Hui Yang, Ling Zhou

The effects of multi-impurity on the entanglement of anisotropic Heisenberg ring XXZ under a homogeneous magnetic field have been studied. The impurities make the equal pairwise entanglement in a ring compete with each other so that the pairwise entanglement exhibits oscillation. If the impurities are of larger couplings, both the critical temperature and pairwise entanglement can be improved.

Chinese Optics Letters•Feb 10, 2007•0 citations

The antiferromagnetic Heisenberg cube

P.N. Moustanis, Stavros Thanos

Physica B Condensed Matter•Sep 1, 1994•2 citations

Symmetry classes connected with the magnetic Heisenberg ring

Bernd Fiedler

Abstract. It is well-known (see [1]) that for a Heisenberg magnet symmetry operators and symmetry classes can be defined in a very similar way as for tensors (see e.g. [2, 3, 4]). Newer papers which consider the action of permutations on the Hilbert space H of the Heisenberg magnet are [5, 6, 7, 8]. We define symmetry classes and commutation symmetries in the Hilbert space H of the 1D spin-1/2 Heisenberg magnetic ring with N sites and investigate them by means of tools from the representation theory of symmetric groups SN such as decompositions of ideals of the group ring C[SN], idempotents of C[SN], discrete Fourier transforms of SN, Littlewood-Richardson products. In particular, we determine smallest symmetry classes and stability subgroups of both single eigenvectors v and subspaces U of eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian H of the magnet. Expectedly, the symmetry classes defined by stability subgroups of v or U are bigger than the corresponding smallest symmetry classes of v or U, respectively. The determination of the smallest symmetry class for U bases on an algorithm which calculates explicitely a generating idempotent for a non-direct sum of right ideals of C[SN]. Let U (r1,r2)

•Nov 21, 2012•1 citation

The Heisenberg Spin Chain

Carlo Heissenberg, Augusto Sagnotti

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 6, 2022•0 citations
Abstract. It is well-known (see [1]) that for a Heisenberg magnet symmetry operators and symmetry classes can be defined in a very similar way as for tensors (see e.g. [2, 3, 4]). Newer papers which consider the action of permutations on the Hilbert space H of the Heisenberg magnet are [5, 6, 7, 8]. We define symmetry classes and commutation symmetries in the Hilbert space H of the 1D spin-1/2 Heisenberg magnetic ring with N sites and investigate them by means of tools from the representation theory of symmetric groups SN such as decompositions of ideals of the group ring C[SN], idempotents of C[SN], discrete Fourier transforms of SN, Littlewood-Richardson products. In particular, we determine smallest symmetry classes and stability subgroups of both single eigenvectors v and subspaces U of eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian H of the magnet. Expectedly, the symmetry classes defined by stability subgroups of v or U are bigger than the corresponding smallest symmetry classes of v or U, respectively. The determination of the smallest symmetry class for U bases on an algorithm which calculates explicitely a generating idempotent for a non-direct sum of right ideals of C[SN]. Let U (r1,r2)