Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer proceedings in physics

A Method for Determining Many Body Wavefunctions

Cyrus J. Umrigar, Kenneth Geddes Wilson, John W. Wilkins

Published Jan 1, 1988• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-93400-1_20

Related papers

Variational Monte Carlo

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

Since the form of PN is the same as that occurring in the statistical mechanics of the classical gas (replace f 2 ( r ij ) by exp[- V ( r ij /kT ]), we can use the same integration techniques that are used in the classical problem. W. L. McMillan, 1965 Summary Building on the random walk methods developed in the previous chapter, we show how to compute properties of many-body trial wavefunctions using a random walk. This method, called variational Monte Carlo, is the simplest stochastic quantum many-body technique. Whereas mean-field methods are usually limited to single determinants, variational Monte Carlo can treat any correlated trial function, as long as its values are computable. We discuss how to optimize such trial wavefunctions, how to compute their momentum distribution, how to use non-local pseudopotentials, how to compute excited states, and how to correct for the finite size of the simulation cell. Deterministic quantum methods have difficulties. For example, the Hartree–Fock method assumes the wavefunction is a single Slater determinant, neglecting correlation. If one expands as a sum of determinants, it is very difficult to have the results size-consistent since the number of determinants needed will grow exponentially with the system size. As we have seen, the DMFT method introduced in Ch. 16 assumes locality. In Ch. 6 we discussed general properties of many-body wavefunctions. Using Monte Carlo methods, we can directly incorporate correlation into a wavefunction, without having to make any further approximations other than the form of the correlation factors. In many cases the energy and other properties are very close to the exact results. Some of the usual restrictions on the form of the many-body wavefunction are not an issue in variational Monte Carlo. The most important generalization of the HF wavefunction is to put correlation directly into the wavefunction via the “Jastrow” factor. At next order, one can use the “backflow” wavefunction, in which correlation is also built into the determinant. The variational Monte Carlo method (VMC) was first used by McMillan [44] to calculate the ground-state properties of superfluid 4 He. One of the key problems at that time was whether the observed superfluid properties were a consequence of Bose condensation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•1 citation

A Method for the Analysis of Many-Electron Wave Functions

Oktay Si̇nanoğlu

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jul 1, 1963•42 citations

Wavefunction methods in electronic-structure theory of solids

Peter Fulde

The electronic-structure theory of solids is presently dominated by density-functional methods which avoid calculations of the many-body wavefunction, and instead compute directly properties of the ground state. We argue that methods which determine the many-electron wavefunctions should receive particular attention in the future. A survey is given of our present knowledge of how to calculate these wavefunctions for a solid. The accuracy we envisage compares with the one obtainable for small molecules when applying quantum-chemical methods.

Advances In Physics•May 1, 2002•52 citations

The Determination of Atomic Wave Functions

Louis C. Green

•Jan 1, 1955•0 citations

Non-orthogonal multi-Slater determinant expansions in auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo

Edgar Josué Landinez Borda, John A. Gomez, Miguel A. Morales

We investigate the use of non-orthogonal multi-Slater determinant (NOMSD) expansions as trial wavefunctions in auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo simulations of molecular systems. We show that NOMSD trial wavefunctions with as few as twenty determinants are sufficient in order to achieve chemical accuracy across most of the G1 molecular test set. We also show that NOMSD trial wavefunctions are useful for more challenging strongly correlated systems by computing relative energies along the isomerization path of the [Cu2O2]2+ molecule. Our results for [Cu2O2]2+ compare favorably with other accurate quantum many-body methods, including density matrix renormalization group and completely renormalized coupled cluster methods.

arXiv:1801.10307•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 20, 2019•3 citations

A heuristic method for determining outgoing waves in many-body wave functions

Edward F. Redish, P. C. Tandy, M. L’Huillier

Physics Letters B•Apr 1, 1976•6 citations
Since the form of PN is the same as that occurring in the statistical mechanics of the classical gas (replace f 2 ( r ij ) by exp[- V ( r ij /kT ]), we can use the same integration techniques that are used in the classical problem. W. L. McMillan, 1965 Summary Building on the random walk methods developed in the previous chapter, we show how to compute properties of many-body trial wavefunctions using a random walk. This method, called variational Monte Carlo, is the simplest stochastic quantum many-body technique. Whereas mean-field methods are usually limited to single determinants, variational Monte Carlo can treat any correlated trial function, as long as its values are computable. We discuss how to optimize such trial wavefunctions, how to compute their momentum distribution, how to use non-local pseudopotentials, how to compute excited states, and how to correct for the finite size of the simulation cell. Deterministic quantum methods have difficulties. For example, the Hartree–Fock method assumes the wavefunction is a single Slater determinant, neglecting correlation. If one expands as a sum of determinants, it is very difficult to have the results size-consistent since the number of determinants needed will grow exponentially with the system size. As we have seen, the DMFT method introduced in Ch. 16 assumes locality. In Ch. 6 we discussed general properties of many-body wavefunctions. Using Monte Carlo methods, we can directly incorporate correlation into a wavefunction, without having to make any further approximations other than the form of the correlation factors. In many cases the energy and other properties are very close to the exact results. Some of the usual restrictions on the form of the many-body wavefunction are not an issue in variational Monte Carlo. The most important generalization of the HF wavefunction is to put correlation directly into the wavefunction via the “Jastrow” factor. At next order, one can use the “backflow” wavefunction, in which correlation is also built into the determinant. The variational Monte Carlo method (VMC) was first used by McMillan [44] to calculate the ground-state properties of superfluid 4 He. One of the key problems at that time was whether the observed superfluid properties were a consequence of Bose condensation.
The electronic-structure theory of solids is presently dominated by density-functional methods which avoid calculations of the many-body wavefunction, and instead compute directly properties of the ground state. We argue that methods which determine the many-electron wavefunctions should receive particular attention in the future. A survey is given of our present knowledge of how to calculate these wavefunctions for a solid. The accuracy we envisage compares with the one obtainable for small molecules when applying quantum-chemical methods.
We investigate the use of non-orthogonal multi-Slater determinant (NOMSD) expansions as trial wavefunctions in auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo simulations of molecular systems. We show that NOMSD trial wavefunctions with as few as twenty determinants are sufficient in order to achieve chemical accuracy across most of the G1 molecular test set. We also show that NOMSD trial wavefunctions are useful for more challenging strongly correlated systems by computing relative energies along the isomerization path of the [Cu2O2]2+ molecule. Our results for [Cu2O2]2+ compare favorably with other accurate quantum many-body methods, including density matrix renormalization group and completely renormalized coupled cluster methods.