Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Experimental comparison of two methods for quantum cryptography

J. D. Franson, H. Ilves

Published May 2, 1993• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Experimental quantum cryptography

Charles H. Bennett, François Bessette, Gilles Brassard A +2 more

Journal of Cryptology•Jan 1, 1992•1,673 citations

Experimental comparison between one-decoy and two-decoy implementations of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 quantum cryptography protocol

Youn-Chang Jeong, Yong‐Su Kim, Yoon-Ho Kim

The decoy-state method allows the use of weak coherent pulses in quantum cryptography, and to date, various strategies for the decoy state have been proposed. Here, we experimentally compare the secret key generation rates between the one-decoy and two-decoy implementations of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol through a 3.1-km optical fiber at 780 nm. Once the parameters of the experimental setup are optimized for the maximal secret key generation rate for each implementation, it is found that the two-decoy implementation outperforms the one-decoy implementation.

Physical Review A•Jan 14, 2016•4 citations

EXPERIMENTAL QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY

Hugo Zbinden

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 1998•23 citations

Experimental comparison between one-decoy and two-decoy implementations of theBennett-Brassard 1984 quantum cryptography protocol

Yoon‐Ho Kim, 김용수, 정연창

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Studies on the Quality Assessment of PRNG for Q-Trits Quantum Cryptography Protocols

Sergiy O. Gnatyuk, Тетяна Охріменко, Andrii Fesenko +1 more

Cybersecurity contains three basic features such as confidentiality, integrity and availability. Data confidentiality ensuring by encryption has faced quantum computing threat, but this problem can be solved by using post-quantum cryptography and / or quantum cryptography (quantum key distribution). For cryptographic applications statistical properties of the generated pseudorandom sequences should not be differ from random sequences. To determine such properties a number of statistical testing methods are used, but they all are focused on the evaluation of binary sequences. In quantum cryptography there are some protocols with Q-trits (qutrits), but these sequences cannot be assessed effectively by binary statistic methods. From this position in the paper quality assessment approach for Q-trits pseudo random number generators and formed sequences was proposed. Also the experimental study of proposed approach (in comparison with NIST STS) was carried out. Given results show that NIST STS technique cannot be used to evaluate the quality of the Q-trit sequences and generators, but developed method is suitable to use in practice for evaluating Q-trit sequences (generators) quality.

International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications Science and Technology•Oct 5, 2021•1 citation

Experimental Quantum Cryptography

Charles H. Bennett, François Bessette, Gilles Brassard A +2 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1991•957 citations
The decoy-state method allows the use of weak coherent pulses in quantum cryptography, and to date, various strategies for the decoy state have been proposed. Here, we experimentally compare the secret key generation rates between the one-decoy and two-decoy implementations of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution protocol through a 3.1-km optical fiber at 780 nm. Once the parameters of the experimental setup are optimized for the maximal secret key generation rate for each implementation, it is found that the two-decoy implementation outperforms the one-decoy implementation.
Cybersecurity contains three basic features such as confidentiality, integrity and availability. Data confidentiality ensuring by encryption has faced quantum computing threat, but this problem can be solved by using post-quantum cryptography and / or quantum cryptography (quantum key distribution). For cryptographic applications statistical properties of the generated pseudorandom sequences should not be differ from random sequences. To determine such properties a number of statistical testing methods are used, but they all are focused on the evaluation of binary sequences. In quantum cryptography there are some protocols with Q-trits (qutrits), but these sequences cannot be assessed effectively by binary statistic methods. From this position in the paper quality assessment approach for Q-trits pseudo random number generators and formed sequences was proposed. Also the experimental study of proposed approach (in comparison with NIST STS) was carried out. Given results show that NIST STS technique cannot be used to evaluate the quality of the Q-trit sequences and generators, but developed method is suitable to use in practice for evaluating Q-trit sequences (generators) quality.