Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optical Bistability and Instabilities via Diffraction-Free-Encoding and a Single Feedback Mirror

Martine Le Berre, Elisabeth Ressayre, Andree A. Tallet, Kuochou Tai, F. A. Hopf, H. M. Gibbs, J. V. Moloney

Published Jun 18, 1984• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Analytical description of diffraction-free-encoding optical bistability and instabilities (A)

Martine Le Berre, Elisabeth Ressayre, Andree A. Tallet

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 1984•1 citation

Observation of the single-mode instability in optical bistability (A)

Luis A. Orozco, Albert T. Rosenberger, Harry J. Kimble

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 1984•1 citation

Transverse optical bistabilities and instabilities

Martine Le Berre, Elisabeth Ressayre, Andree A. Tallet +2 more

A transverse optical bistability is defined here as a bistability that would not occur with a plane-wave input, i.e., it depends crucially upon the radial variations in the input. Such bistabilities are characterized by much more pronounced changes in transverse profiles than in total transmission. An optical cavity is not required, making such systems good candidates for continuous wave studies of delayed-feedback instabilities which require a round-trip time longer than the medium response time. Trapping bistability and diffraction-free-encoding bistability are two limiting cases of transverse optical bistabilities. Trapping bistability occurs only for a long self-focusing nonlinear medium and arises from self-trapping of a single beam with a single feedback mirror or from cross trapping of two counterpropagating beams. In the diffraction-free-encoding case, diffraction is negligible through the portion of the nonlinear medium performing the encoding, but it is significant through any remaining medium and in the free-space propagation to the mirror and back. This paper is organized as follows: The physics of transverse optical bistabilities is summarized in Section I. Theoretical models are presented in Section II. A thin-sample-encoding (TSE) rings model is defined and shown not only to predict transverse bistability but also to account for the interference rings observed to accompany TSE bistability; it also yields delayed-feedback instabilities with a rich bifurcation sequence. Transverse bistability using a short length of sodium vapor is reported under TSE and DFE conditions in Section III. Recently it was discovered that TSE bistability has been seen only when the feedback beam is displaced from the input by about one beam diameter at the sodium. It remains to be determined just how much the nonconcentric feedback assists the concentric bistability predicted by the TSE rings model. A delayed-feedback instability with a period of twice the round-trip time is also seen.

IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics•Sep 1, 1985•18 citations

Transverse Optical Bistability and Instabilities

H. M. Gibbs, Matthew W. Derstine, Kuochou Tai +4 more

A transverse optical bistability would not occur with a plane-wave input; it is characterized by pronounced changes in transverse profiles, but not in total transmission.1 The systems studied here consist of a single feedback mirror and a nonlinear medium (Na vapor) sufficiently thin that diffraction is negligible during the nonlinear radially dependent phase encoding. With the input focused beyond (before) the Na and the mirror center of curvature on the input (output) side of the Na, self-defocusing (self-focusing) optical bistability is seen--but only when the feedback is nonconcentric, i.e., the feedback beam is displaced off-axis relative to the input beam. If cylindrical lenses are used to form an elongated focus in the Na, bistability is still seen. This suggests that one-transverse-dimension (ID) theories may be adequate to describe the system's steady-state and transient behavior. ID numerical simulations with nonconcentric feedback are under way.

Topical Meeting on Optical Bistability (OB)•Jan 1, 1985•0 citations

Optical Bistability Without Optical Feedback and Absorption-Related Nonlinearities

E. Garmire

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•1 citation

Optical Bistability and Its Instability

Chunfei Li

Nonlinear Optics•Aug 26, 2016•2 citations
A transverse optical bistability is defined here as a bistability that would not occur with a plane-wave input, i.e., it depends crucially upon the radial variations in the input. Such bistabilities are characterized by much more pronounced changes in transverse profiles than in total transmission. An optical cavity is not required, making such systems good candidates for continuous wave studies of delayed-feedback instabilities which require a round-trip time longer than the medium response time. Trapping bistability and diffraction-free-encoding bistability are two limiting cases of transverse optical bistabilities. Trapping bistability occurs only for a long self-focusing nonlinear medium and arises from self-trapping of a single beam with a single feedback mirror or from cross trapping of two counterpropagating beams. In the diffraction-free-encoding case, diffraction is negligible through the portion of the nonlinear medium performing the encoding, but it is significant through any remaining medium and in the free-space propagation to the mirror and back. This paper is organized as follows: The physics of transverse optical bistabilities is summarized in Section I. Theoretical models are presented in Section II. A thin-sample-encoding (TSE) rings model is defined and shown not only to predict transverse bistability but also to account for the interference rings observed to accompany TSE bistability; it also yields delayed-feedback instabilities with a rich bifurcation sequence. Transverse bistability using a short length of sodium vapor is reported under TSE and DFE conditions in Section III. Recently it was discovered that TSE bistability has been seen only when the feedback beam is displaced from the input by about one beam diameter at the sodium. It remains to be determined just how much the nonconcentric feedback assists the concentric bistability predicted by the TSE rings model. A delayed-feedback instability with a period of twice the round-trip time is also seen.
A transverse optical bistability would not occur with a plane-wave input; it is characterized by pronounced changes in transverse profiles, but not in total transmission.1 The systems studied here consist of a single feedback mirror and a nonlinear medium (Na vapor) sufficiently thin that diffraction is negligible during the nonlinear radially dependent phase encoding. With the input focused beyond (before) the Na and the mirror center of curvature on the input (output) side of the Na, self-defocusing (self-focusing) optical bistability is seen--but only when the feedback is nonconcentric, i.e., the feedback beam is displaced off-axis relative to the input beam. If cylindrical lenses are used to form an elongated focus in the Na, bistability is still seen. This suggests that one-transverse-dimension (ID) theories may be adequate to describe the system's steady-state and transient behavior. ID numerical simulations with nonconcentric feedback are under way.