The construction of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group is discussed from the viewpoint of relativistic kinematics, within the limitations of the construction with the characteristic invariants P/sub mu P/sup mu > 0. The construction given depends essentially on an explicit calculation of Wigner considerations. The problem of reducing this construction of the homogeneous Lorentz group is solved, explicitly for the construction of the inhomogeneous group, by a transformation from the canonical basis to another basis into which the construction operators of the homogeneous Lorentz transformation is decomposed. The analogs to the Clebsch-Gordon series for the product construction of the rotational group were determined for the product of the two irreducible constructions of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. (J.S.R.)
The construction of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group is discussed from the viewpoint of relativistic kinematics, within the limitations of the construction with the characteristic invariants P/sub mu P/sup mu > 0. The construction given depends essentially on an explicit calculation of Wigner considerations. The problem of reducing this construction of the homogeneous Lorentz group is solved, explicitly for the construction of the inhomogeneous group, by a transformation from the canonical basis to another basis into which the construction operators of the homogeneous Lorentz transformation is decomposed. The analogs to the Clebsch-Gordon series for the product construction of the rotational group were determined for the product of the two irreducible constructions of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. (J.S.R.)
What is relativistic quantum theory? How does it differ from non-relativistic quantum mechanics? Is there something more involved than the transition from the Galilean group to the Lorentz group? These questions are evidently of great importance to the understanding of relativistic quantum theory (RQT), in particular to the distinction between the basic principles of quantum theory, and the characterization of a particular class of dynamical evolutions. Within non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) a reasonably precise response is possible (differences concern the number of degrees of freedom, the existence of internal symmetries, and the form of the Hamiltonian as a function of the canonical variables); what appears characteristic of RQT is the appearance of a dynamics of a qualitatively different character (involving the creation and annihilation of particles), involving new kinds of constraints (renormalization theory: anomalies). Nevertheless, it seems we must know how to pass from the inhomogeneous Galilean group (IHGG) to the Lorentz group (IHLG), if only because we have successfully constructed a RQT, surely, then, we know what it is that we hold invariant in this transition.
In this thesis, entanglement under fully relativistic settings are discussed. The thesis starts with a brief review of the relativistic quantum mechanics. In order to describe the effects of Lorentz transformations on the entangled states, quantum mechanics and special relativity are merged by construction of the unitary irreducible representations of Poincar{é} group on the infinite dimensional Hilbert space of state vectors. In this framework, the issue of finding the unitary irreducible representations of Poincar{é} group is reduced to that of the little group. Wigner rotation for the massive particles plays a crucial role due to its effect on the spin polarization directions. Furthermore, the physical requirements for constructing the correct relativistic spin operator is also studied. Then, the entanglement and Bell type inequalities are reviewed. Special attention has been devoted to two historical papers, by EPR in 1935 and by J.S. Bell in 1964. The main part of the thesis is based on the Lorentz transformation of the Bell states and the Bell inequalities on these transformed states. It is shown that entanglement is a Lorentz invariant quantity. That is, no inertial observer can see the entangled state as a separable one. However, it was shown that the Bell inequality may be satisfied for the Wigner angle dependent transformed entangled states. Since the Wigner rotation changes the spin polarization direction with the increased velocity, initial dichotomous operators can satisfy the Bell inequality for those states. By choosing the dichotomous operators taking into consideration the Wigner angle, it is always possible to show that Bell type inequalities can be violated for the transformed entangled states.
The dynamics of a system of particles acting on one another at a distance can be relativistically invariant if the assumption of invariant world-lines is given up. This is shown by constructing a particular dynamics in which invariance over the homogeneous Lorentz group is trivial, but space as well as time displacement requires the solution of equations of motion or of a Schroedinger equation. This particular dynamics reduces in the nonrelativistic limit to the most general dynamics of a system of interacting particles admitting the Newtonian group.
Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.
The diffculties of relativistic particle theories formulated my means of canonical quantization, such as Klein-Gordon and Dirac theories, ultimately led theoretical physicists to turn on quantum field theory to model elementary particle physics. The aim of the present work is to pursue a method alternative to canonical quantization that avoids these dfficulties. In order to guarantee this result, the present approach is constrained to be developed deductively from physical principles. The physical principles assumed for a free particle consist of the symmetry properties of the particle with respect to the Poincaré group and of the transformation properties of the position observable, expressed by means of a suitably conceived notion of quantum transformation. In so doing, the effectiveness of group theoretical methods is exploited. Our work has pointed out the necessity of new classes of irreducible representations of the Poincaré group the theory can be based on. For spin 0 particle, four inequivalent theories are completely determined, that differ from Klein-Gordon theory for the physical interpretation but also for the mathematical structures. In particular, two of these theories requires irreducible representations in the new classes. The present lack of the explicit transformation properties of position with respect to boosts forbids the complete determination of non zero spin particle theories. A particular form of these transformation properties was in past adopted by Jordan and Mukunda. We check its consistency within the present approach; it is found that for spin 1/2 particles there is only one consistent theory; it is unitarily related to Dirac theory, but, once again, it requires the new classes of irreducible representations.
In parts II and III of the present series of papers, the localization problem was studied for the cases of relativistic nonzero mass (spin 0, 21) and zero mass (spin 0, 21, and 1). With a set of postulates, of which the basic one is the imposition of Lorentz invariance of localization (LIL) (which is a self-consistency requirement), it was possible to define the position operator uniquely (except for a constant in the spin-21, nonzero-mass case). For the determination of the position operators it was enough to consider only very special cases of homogeneous Lorentz transformations. One of the purposes of the present paper is to consider the effect of arbitrary inhomogeneous continuous Lorentz transformations in order to obtain general Poincar\'e-invariant localization (GPIL). Our main result will be that localization is LIL if and only if it is GPIL. In II and III, LIL was obtained in spite of the fact that the position operators were not 4-vector operators but only 3-vector operators. In this paper, following Fleming, we construct formally covariant position operators from the 3-vector operators. We prove that their eigenfunctions are just the localized states defined in the GPIL sense.