Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Nature and Structure of Time

J. G. Cramer

Published Dec 23, 2015• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-24642-0_9

Related papers

A Conjecture on the Nature of Time

Felix M. Lev

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

The theory of the nature of time Description of quantum mechanics phenomena in six dimensions of space and time

Sayed Kazem Mousavi

This study presents a theory with a six-dimensional space-time structure, , in order to describe microscopic phenomena, the time arrow and complex phenomena of the quantum world. The interpretation of quantum world phenomena using four-dimensional space-time would be a very complicated and indescribable task. The dual wave-particle behavior, entanglement, quantum corridors, etc., represent the complex space-time structure. Previous studies indicate that complicated behaviors of particles in quantum mechanics are basically considered as the natural behavior of those particles. The theoretical framework of the nature of time is the transformation of imaginary dimensions into geometric dimensions and the description of quantum mechanical phenomena using external Euclidean geometry. The six-dimensional space-time structure consists of three space and three time dimensions, , and the time arrow is the result of the impossibility of the existence of matter in six space-time dimensions, and the direction of the arrow is aligned with the expansion of the universe.

•Jan 21, 2021•0 citations

The nature of time: Explaining quantum mechanical phenomena

Sayed Kazem Mousavi

•Jan 21, 2021•0 citations

Time as Scalar: The Observer as the Origin of Temporal Measurement

Shrikant Bhosale

This essay establishes the foundational claim of the Time as Scalar framework: time is not a constituent of nature but a measuring instrument applied by finite observers. The universe operates through causal structure, geometry, and physical law without requiring a clock. What requires time is the observer—specifically memory-based comparison that allows events to be sequenced and rendered meaningful. The work formally separates three compatible layers: the ontological layer of causal structure (physics), the epistemological layer of temporal measurement (observer-based), and the phenomenological layer of lived temporal experience. Central to the argument is the time-independent Schrödinger equation, interpreted not as a special case but as the natural baseline of a clock-free universe. Time appears only when observers measure deviations from stationary geometry. Memory functions as the anchoring end of the temporal ruler, and forgetting is framed as necessary instrument maintenance. Randomness and surprise emerge as properties of the observer’s measurement gap rather than of nature itself. This document serves as a foundation for further formal development connecting Scope Theory, Hilbert space structure, and quantum measurement regularization.

•Feb 23, 2026•0 citations

The nature of time: Explaining quantum mechanical phenomena

Sayed Kazem Mousavi, Mousavi, Seyed,

•Jan 21, 2021•0 citations

A Timeless Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Superposition as Configurational Structure

Fiorito, Paolo

This paper proposes a timeless interpretation of quantum mechanics in which fundamental reality is configurational rather than temporal. What we perceive as the temporal evolution of a particle is reinterpreted as our sequential perspective on a static structure of spatial correlations. Quantum superposition reveals this nature: all possible spatial configurations coexist in a timeless reality, and only when we—bound by time—observe the system, do we project this multiplicity into a temporal sequence. When we measure a quantum system, we do not collapse a wave function but rather synchronize our clock-system with a specific section of the timeless structure. This interpretation connects naturally with existing timeless approaches such as the Page-Wootters mechanism and Wheeler-DeWitt equation, while offering a distinctive perspective on the nature of the wave function, measurement, and the emergence of time from correlations within an atemporal quantum reality.

•Dec 10, 2025•0 citations
This study presents a theory with a six-dimensional space-time structure, , in order to describe microscopic phenomena, the time arrow and complex phenomena of the quantum world. The interpretation of quantum world phenomena using four-dimensional space-time would be a very complicated and indescribable task. The dual wave-particle behavior, entanglement, quantum corridors, etc., represent the complex space-time structure. Previous studies indicate that complicated behaviors of particles in quantum mechanics are basically considered as the natural behavior of those particles. The theoretical framework of the nature of time is the transformation of imaginary dimensions into geometric dimensions and the description of quantum mechanical phenomena using external Euclidean geometry. The six-dimensional space-time structure consists of three space and three time dimensions, , and the time arrow is the result of the impossibility of the existence of matter in six space-time dimensions, and the direction of the arrow is aligned with the expansion of the universe.
This essay establishes the foundational claim of the Time as Scalar framework: time is not a constituent of nature but a measuring instrument applied by finite observers. The universe operates through causal structure, geometry, and physical law without requiring a clock. What requires time is the observer—specifically memory-based comparison that allows events to be sequenced and rendered meaningful. The work formally separates three compatible layers: the ontological layer of causal structure (physics), the epistemological layer of temporal measurement (observer-based), and the phenomenological layer of lived temporal experience. Central to the argument is the time-independent Schrödinger equation, interpreted not as a special case but as the natural baseline of a clock-free universe. Time appears only when observers measure deviations from stationary geometry. Memory functions as the anchoring end of the temporal ruler, and forgetting is framed as necessary instrument maintenance. Randomness and surprise emerge as properties of the observer’s measurement gap rather than of nature itself. This document serves as a foundation for further formal development connecting Scope Theory, Hilbert space structure, and quantum measurement regularization.
This paper proposes a timeless interpretation of quantum mechanics in which fundamental reality is configurational rather than temporal. What we perceive as the temporal evolution of a particle is reinterpreted as our sequential perspective on a static structure of spatial correlations. Quantum superposition reveals this nature: all possible spatial configurations coexist in a timeless reality, and only when we—bound by time—observe the system, do we project this multiplicity into a temporal sequence. When we measure a quantum system, we do not collapse a wave function but rather synchronize our clock-system with a specific section of the timeless structure. This interpretation connects naturally with existing timeless approaches such as the Page-Wootters mechanism and Wheeler-DeWitt equation, while offering a distinctive perspective on the nature of the wave function, measurement, and the emergence of time from correlations within an atemporal quantum reality.