Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Topics in applied physics

Coherent and hyper-raman techniques

H. Vogt

Published Jan 1, 1982• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-11380-0_16

Related papers

Quantum theory of coherent Raman and coherent hyper-Raman scattering

Jón Örn Bjarnason

•Jan 1, 1979•0 citations

Cw hyper-Raman laser in the near infrared

D. Krökel, D. Frölich, W. Klische +2 more

Optics Communications•Nov 1, 1983•8 citations

Spectroscopy of resonance hyper-Raman scattering of light

Alexander V. Baranov, Яков Семенович Бобович, V.I. Petrov

Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk•Jan 1, 1990•5 citations

Suppression of hyper-Raman scattering by destructive interference process

Yu. P. Malakyan

Optics Communications•Jan 1, 1989•18 citations

Resonant coherent hyper-Raman scattering (CHRS). II. A theory on the general relationship between CHRS and coherent Raman scattering (CRS) processes

Minhaeng Cho

A theoretical description of the resonant coherent hyper-Raman scattering for an arbitrary system–bath interaction is presented. Particularly the relationship between the coherent hyper-Raman scattering (CHRS) and coherent Raman scattering (CRS) signals is established without alluding to any specific model of optical broadening. The permanent dipole moment difference between the excited and ground states of a given chromophore is shown to be proportional to the ratio of the CHRS to CRS signals, and it is proved that this result is valid regardless of the model for the chromophore–bath interaction.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Aug 8, 1998•4 citations

COHERENT RAMAN TECHNIQUES

G. L. Eesley

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1981•19 citations
A theoretical description of the resonant coherent hyper-Raman scattering for an arbitrary system–bath interaction is presented. Particularly the relationship between the coherent hyper-Raman scattering (CHRS) and coherent Raman scattering (CRS) signals is established without alluding to any specific model of optical broadening. The permanent dipole moment difference between the excited and ground states of a given chromophore is shown to be proportional to the ratio of the CHRS to CRS signals, and it is proved that this result is valid regardless of the model for the chromophore–bath interaction.