Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity

On the Power of Random Oracles.

Iftach Haitner, Eran Omri, Hila Zarosim

Published Jan 1, 2012• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In the random oracle model, the parties are given oracle access to a random member of a (typically huge) function family, and are assumed to have unbounded computational power (though they can only make a bounded number of oracle queries). This model provides powerful properties that allow proving the security of many protocols, even such that cannot be proved secure in the standard model (under any hardness assumption). The random oracle model is also used to show that a given cryptographic primitive cannot be used in a black-box way to construct another primitive; in their seminal work, Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC ’89] showed that in the random function model – when the function family is the set of all functions – it is impossible to construct (secure) key-agreement protocols, yielding that key-agreement cannot be black-box reduced to one-way functions. Their work has a long line of followup works (Simon [EC ’98], Gertner et al. [STOC ’00] and Gennaro et al. [SICOMP ’05], to name a few), showing that given oracle access to a certain type of function family (e.g., the family that “implements ” public-key encryption) is not sufficient for building a given cryptographic primitive (e.g., oblivious transfer). Yet, in the more general sense, the following fundamental question remained open: What is the exact power of the random oracle model, and more specifically, of the random function model? We make progress towards answering the above question, showing that any (no private input) semi-honest two-party functionality that can be securely implemented in the random function model, can be securely implemented information theoretically (where parties are assumed to be all powerful, and no oracle is given). We further generalize the above result to function families that provide some natural combinatorial property. To exhibit the power of our result, we use the recent information theoretic impossibility result of McGregor et al. [FOCS ’10], to show the existence of functionalities (e.g., inner product) that cannot be computed both accurately and in a differentially private manner in the random function model; yielding that protocols for computing these functionalities cannot be black-box reduced to the existence of one-way functions.

Related papers

Limits of Random Oracles in Secure Computation

Mohammad Mahmoody, Hemanta K. Maji, Manoj Prabhakaran

The seminal result of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 1989) gave a black-box separation between one-way functions and public-key encryption: informally, a public-key encryption scheme cannot be constructed using one-way functions as the sole source of computational hardness. In addition, this implied a black-box separation between one-way functions and protocols for certain Secure Function Evaluation (SFE) functionalities (in particular, Oblivious Transfer). Surprisingly, however, {\em since then there has been no further progress in separating one-way functions and SFE functionalities} (though several other black-box separation results were shown). In this work, we present the complete picture for deterministic 2-party SFE functionalities. We show that one-way functions are black-box separated from {\em all such SFE functionalities}, except the ones which have unconditionally secure protocols (and hence do not rely on any computational hardness), when secure computation against semi-honest adversaries is considered. In the case of security against active adversaries, a black-box one-way function is indeed useful for SFE, but we show that it is useful only as much as access to an ideal commitment functionality is useful. Technically, our main result establishes the limitations of random oracles for secure computation.

arXiv:1205.3554•Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•May 16, 2012•0 citations

Limits of random oracles in secure computation

Mohammad Mahmoody, Hemanta K. Maji, Manoj Prabhakaran

The seminal result of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 1989) gave a black-box separation between one-way functions and public-key encryption: a public-key encryption scheme cannot be constructed using one-way functions in a black-box way. In addition, their result implied black-box separations between one-way functions and protocols for certain Secure Function Evaluation (SFE) functionalities (in particular, Oblivious Transfer). Surprisingly, however, since then there has been no further progress in separating one-way functions and SFE functionalities. In this work, we present the complete picture for finite deterministic 2-party SFE functionalities, vis a vis one-way functions. We show that in case of semi-honest adversaries, one-way functions are black-box separated from all such SFE functionalities, except the ones which have unconditionally secure protocols (and hence do not rely on any computational hardness). In the case of active adversaries, a black-box one-way function is indeed useful for SFE, but we show that it is useful only as much as access to an ideal commitment functionality is useful.

Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science•Jan 12, 2014•10 citations

On the Communication Complexity of Key-Agreement Protocols

Iftach Haitner, Noam Mazor, Rotem Oshman +2 more

Key-agreement protocols whose security is proven in the random oracle model are an important alternative to protocols based on public-key cryptography. In the random oracle model, the parties and the eavesdropper have access to a shared random function (an "oracle"), but the parties are limited in the number of queries they can make to the oracle. The random oracle serves as an abstraction for black-box access to a symmetric cryptographic primitive, such as a collision resistant hash. Unfortunately, as shown by Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC '89] and Barak and Mahmoody [Crypto '09], such protocols can only guarantee limited secrecy: the key of any l-query protocol can be revealed by an O(l^2)-query adversary. This quadratic gap between the query complexity of the honest parties and the eavesdropper matches the gap obtained by the Merkle's Puzzles protocol of Merkle [CACM '78]. In this work we tackle a new aspect of key-agreement protocols in the random oracle model: their communication complexity. In Merkle's Puzzles, to obtain secrecy against an eavesdropper that makes roughly l^2 queries, the honest parties need to exchange Omega(l) bits. We show that for protocols with certain natural properties, ones that Merkle's Puzzle has, such high communication is unavoidable. Specifically, this is the case if the honest parties' queries are uniformly random, or alternatively if the protocol uses non-adaptive queries and has only two rounds. Our proof for the first setting uses a novel reduction from the set-disjointness problem in two-party communication complexity. For the second setting we prove the lower bound directly, using information-theoretic arguments. Understanding the communication complexity of protocols whose security is proven (in the random-oracle model) is an important question in the study of practical protocols. Our results and proof techniques are a first step in this direction.

arXiv:2105.01958•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2019•6 citations

Limits on the Power of Indistinguishability Obfuscation and Functional Encryption

Gilad Asharov, Gil Segev

Recent breakthroughs in cryptography have positioned indistinguishability obfuscation as a “central hub” for almost all known cryptographic tasks, and as an extremely powerful building block for new cryptographic tasks resolving long-standing and foundational open problems. However, constructions based on indistinguishability obfuscation almost always rely on non-black-box techniques, and thus the extent to which it can be used as a building block has been completely unexplored so far. We present a framework for proving meaningful negative results on the power of indistinguishability obfuscation. By considering indistinguishability obfuscation for oracle-aided circuits, we capture the common techniques that have been used so far in constructions based on indistinguishability obfuscation. These include, in particular, non-black-box techniques such as the punctured programming approach of Sahai and Waters [A. Sahai and B. Waters, How to use indistinguishability obfuscation: Deniable encryption, and more, in Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 475--484] and its variants, as well as subexponential security assumptions. Within our framework we prove the first negative results on the power of indistinguishability obfuscation and of the tightly related notion of functional encryption. Our results are as follows: (1) There is no fully black-box construction of a collision-resistant function family from an indistinguishability obfuscator for oracle-aided circuits. (2) There is no fully black-box construction of a key-agreement protocol with perfect completeness from a private-key functional encryption scheme for oracle-aided circuits. Specifically, we prove that any such potential constructions must suffer from an exponential security loss, and thus our results cannot be circumvented using subexponential security assumptions. Our framework captures constructions that may rely on a wide variety of primitives in a non-black-box manner (e.g., obfuscating or generating a functional key for a function that uses the evaluation circuit of a puncturable pseudorandom function), and we only assume that the underlying indistinguishability obfuscator or functional encryption scheme itself is used in a black-box manner.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2016•18 citations

On the Power of Public-key Encryption in Secure Computation

Mohammad Mahmoody, Hemanta K. Maji, Manoj Prabhakaran

We qualitatively separate semi-honest secure computation of non-trivial secure-function eval-uation (SFE) functionalities from existence of key-agreement protocols. Technically, we show the existence of an oracle (namely, PKE-oracle) relative to which key-agreement protocols exist; but it is useless for semi-honest secure realization of symmetric 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE functionalities, i.e. any SFE which can be securely performed relative to this oracle can also be securely performed in the plain model. Our main result has following consequences. ◦ There exists an oracle which is useful for some 3-party deterministic SFE; but useless for semi-honest secure realization of any general 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE. ◦ With respect to semi-honest, standalone or UC security, existence of key-agreement proto-cols (if used in black-box manner) is only as useful as the commitment-hybrid for general 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE functionalities. This work advances (and conceptually simplifies) several state-of-the-art techniques in the field of black-box separations:

•Jan 1, 2013•1 citation

Limits on the Power of Private Constrained PRFs

Mengda Bi, Yaohua Ma, Chenxin Dai

Private constrained PRFs are constrained PRFs where the constrained key hides information about the predicate circuit. Although there are many constructions and applications of PCPRF, its relationship to basic cryptographic primitives, such as one-way functions and public-key encryptions, has been unclear. For example, we don't know whether one-way functions imply PCPRFs for general predicates, nor do we know whether 1-key secure PCPRF for all polynomial-sized predicates imply public-key primitives such as public-key encryption and secret-key agreement. In this work, we prove the black-box separation between a 1-key secure PCPRF for any predicate and a secret-key agreement, which is the first black-box separation result about PCPRF. Specifically, we prove that there exists an oracle relative to which 1-key secure PCPRFs exist while secret-key agreement does not. Our proof is based on the simulation-based technique proposed by Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 89). The main technical challenge in generalizing the simulation-based technique to PCPRF is the issue of unfaithfulness of Eve’s simulation to the real world because our oracle is more complicated than a random oracle. We introduce a new technique which we call the "weighting" technique and show how to leverage it to circumvent the issue of unfaithfulness in the proof framework of Impagliazzo and Rudich.

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
In the random oracle model, the parties are given oracle access to a random member of a (typically huge) function family, and are assumed to have unbounded computational power (though they can only make a bounded number of oracle queries). This model provides powerful properties that allow proving the security of many protocols, even such that cannot be proved secure in the standard model (under any hardness assumption). The random oracle model is also used to show that a given cryptographic primitive cannot be used in a black-box way to construct another primitive; in their seminal work, Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC ’89] showed that in the random function model – when the function family is the set of all functions – it is impossible to construct (secure) key-agreement protocols, yielding that key-agreement cannot be black-box reduced to one-way functions. Their work has a long line of followup works (Simon [EC ’98], Gertner et al. [STOC ’00] and Gennaro et al. [SICOMP ’05], to name a few), showing that given oracle access to a certain type of function family (e.g., the family that “implements ” public-key encryption) is not sufficient for building a given cryptographic primitive (e.g., oblivious transfer). Yet, in the more general sense, the following fundamental question remained open: What is the exact power of the random oracle model, and more specifically, of the random function model? We make progress towards answering the above question, showing that any (no private input) semi-honest two-party functionality that can be securely implemented in the random function model, can be securely implemented information theoretically (where parties are assumed to be all powerful, and no oracle is given). We further generalize the above result to function families that provide some natural combinatorial property. To exhibit the power of our result, we use the recent information theoretic impossibility result of McGregor et al. [FOCS ’10], to show the existence of functionalities (e.g., inner product) that cannot be computed both accurately and in a differentially private manner in the random function model; yielding that protocols for computing these functionalities cannot be black-box reduced to the existence of one-way functions.
The seminal result of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 1989) gave a black-box separation between one-way functions and public-key encryption: informally, a public-key encryption scheme cannot be constructed using one-way functions as the sole source of computational hardness. In addition, this implied a black-box separation between one-way functions and protocols for certain Secure Function Evaluation (SFE) functionalities (in particular, Oblivious Transfer). Surprisingly, however, {\em since then there has been no further progress in separating one-way functions and SFE functionalities} (though several other black-box separation results were shown). In this work, we present the complete picture for deterministic 2-party SFE functionalities. We show that one-way functions are black-box separated from {\em all such SFE functionalities}, except the ones which have unconditionally secure protocols (and hence do not rely on any computational hardness), when secure computation against semi-honest adversaries is considered. In the case of security against active adversaries, a black-box one-way function is indeed useful for SFE, but we show that it is useful only as much as access to an ideal commitment functionality is useful. Technically, our main result establishes the limitations of random oracles for secure computation.
The seminal result of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 1989) gave a black-box separation between one-way functions and public-key encryption: a public-key encryption scheme cannot be constructed using one-way functions in a black-box way. In addition, their result implied black-box separations between one-way functions and protocols for certain Secure Function Evaluation (SFE) functionalities (in particular, Oblivious Transfer). Surprisingly, however, since then there has been no further progress in separating one-way functions and SFE functionalities. In this work, we present the complete picture for finite deterministic 2-party SFE functionalities, vis a vis one-way functions. We show that in case of semi-honest adversaries, one-way functions are black-box separated from all such SFE functionalities, except the ones which have unconditionally secure protocols (and hence do not rely on any computational hardness). In the case of active adversaries, a black-box one-way function is indeed useful for SFE, but we show that it is useful only as much as access to an ideal commitment functionality is useful.
Key-agreement protocols whose security is proven in the random oracle model are an important alternative to protocols based on public-key cryptography. In the random oracle model, the parties and the eavesdropper have access to a shared random function (an "oracle"), but the parties are limited in the number of queries they can make to the oracle. The random oracle serves as an abstraction for black-box access to a symmetric cryptographic primitive, such as a collision resistant hash. Unfortunately, as shown by Impagliazzo and Rudich [STOC '89] and Barak and Mahmoody [Crypto '09], such protocols can only guarantee limited secrecy: the key of any l-query protocol can be revealed by an O(l^2)-query adversary. This quadratic gap between the query complexity of the honest parties and the eavesdropper matches the gap obtained by the Merkle's Puzzles protocol of Merkle [CACM '78]. In this work we tackle a new aspect of key-agreement protocols in the random oracle model: their communication complexity. In Merkle's Puzzles, to obtain secrecy against an eavesdropper that makes roughly l^2 queries, the honest parties need to exchange Omega(l) bits. We show that for protocols with certain natural properties, ones that Merkle's Puzzle has, such high communication is unavoidable. Specifically, this is the case if the honest parties' queries are uniformly random, or alternatively if the protocol uses non-adaptive queries and has only two rounds. Our proof for the first setting uses a novel reduction from the set-disjointness problem in two-party communication complexity. For the second setting we prove the lower bound directly, using information-theoretic arguments. Understanding the communication complexity of protocols whose security is proven (in the random-oracle model) is an important question in the study of practical protocols. Our results and proof techniques are a first step in this direction.
Recent breakthroughs in cryptography have positioned indistinguishability obfuscation as a “central hub” for almost all known cryptographic tasks, and as an extremely powerful building block for new cryptographic tasks resolving long-standing and foundational open problems. However, constructions based on indistinguishability obfuscation almost always rely on non-black-box techniques, and thus the extent to which it can be used as a building block has been completely unexplored so far. We present a framework for proving meaningful negative results on the power of indistinguishability obfuscation. By considering indistinguishability obfuscation for oracle-aided circuits, we capture the common techniques that have been used so far in constructions based on indistinguishability obfuscation. These include, in particular, non-black-box techniques such as the punctured programming approach of Sahai and Waters [A. Sahai and B. Waters, How to use indistinguishability obfuscation: Deniable encryption, and more, in Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 475--484] and its variants, as well as subexponential security assumptions. Within our framework we prove the first negative results on the power of indistinguishability obfuscation and of the tightly related notion of functional encryption. Our results are as follows: (1) There is no fully black-box construction of a collision-resistant function family from an indistinguishability obfuscator for oracle-aided circuits. (2) There is no fully black-box construction of a key-agreement protocol with perfect completeness from a private-key functional encryption scheme for oracle-aided circuits. Specifically, we prove that any such potential constructions must suffer from an exponential security loss, and thus our results cannot be circumvented using subexponential security assumptions. Our framework captures constructions that may rely on a wide variety of primitives in a non-black-box manner (e.g., obfuscating or generating a functional key for a function that uses the evaluation circuit of a puncturable pseudorandom function), and we only assume that the underlying indistinguishability obfuscator or functional encryption scheme itself is used in a black-box manner.
We qualitatively separate semi-honest secure computation of non-trivial secure-function eval-uation (SFE) functionalities from existence of key-agreement protocols. Technically, we show the existence of an oracle (namely, PKE-oracle) relative to which key-agreement protocols exist; but it is useless for semi-honest secure realization of symmetric 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE functionalities, i.e. any SFE which can be securely performed relative to this oracle can also be securely performed in the plain model. Our main result has following consequences. ◦ There exists an oracle which is useful for some 3-party deterministic SFE; but useless for semi-honest secure realization of any general 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE. ◦ With respect to semi-honest, standalone or UC security, existence of key-agreement proto-cols (if used in black-box manner) is only as useful as the commitment-hybrid for general 2-party (deterministic finite) SFE functionalities. This work advances (and conceptually simplifies) several state-of-the-art techniques in the field of black-box separations:
Private constrained PRFs are constrained PRFs where the constrained key hides information about the predicate circuit. Although there are many constructions and applications of PCPRF, its relationship to basic cryptographic primitives, such as one-way functions and public-key encryptions, has been unclear. For example, we don't know whether one-way functions imply PCPRFs for general predicates, nor do we know whether 1-key secure PCPRF for all polynomial-sized predicates imply public-key primitives such as public-key encryption and secret-key agreement. In this work, we prove the black-box separation between a 1-key secure PCPRF for any predicate and a secret-key agreement, which is the first black-box separation result about PCPRF. Specifically, we prove that there exists an oracle relative to which 1-key secure PCPRFs exist while secret-key agreement does not. Our proof is based on the simulation-based technique proposed by Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC 89). The main technical challenge in generalizing the simulation-based technique to PCPRF is the issue of unfaithfulness of Eve’s simulation to the real world because our oracle is more complicated than a random oracle. We introduce a new technique which we call the "weighting" technique and show how to leverage it to circumvent the issue of unfaithfulness in the proof framework of Impagliazzo and Rudich.