Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Hardness of decision (R)LWE for any modulus.

Adeline Roux-Langlois, Damien Stehlé

Published Jan 1, 2012• 12 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Abstract. The decision Learning With Errors problem has proven an extremely flexible foundation for devising provably secure cryptographic primitives. LWE can be expressed in terms of linear algebra over Z/qZ. This modulus q is the subject of study of the present work. When q is prime and small, or when it is exponential and composite with small factors, LWE is known to be at least as hard as standard worst-case problems over euclidean lattices (sometimes using quantum reductions). The Ring Learning With Errors problem is a structured variant of LWE allowing for more compact keys and more efficient primitives. It is known to be at least as hard as standard worst-case problems restricted to so-called ideal lattices, but under even more restrictive arithmetic conditions on q. In this work, we prove that the arithmetic form of the modulus q is irrelevant to the computational hardness of LWE and RLWE. More precisely, we show that these problems are at least as hard as standard worst-case problems on lattices, under the unique condition that q is of polynomial bit-size. This result is most useful for adapting LWE-based cryptographic constructions to the RLWE setting. Among others, this allows us to derive the first Identity-Based Encryption scheme of quasi-optimal performance proven secure under standard worst-case lattice assumptions, in the standard model. Other applications include authentication, functional encryption and traitor tracing.

Related papers

On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors Over Rings.

Vadim Lyubashevsky, Chris Peikert, Oded Regev

The “learning with errors ” (LWE) problem is to distinguish random linear equations, which have been perturbed by a small amount of noise, from truly uniform ones. The problem has been shown to be as hard as worst-case lattice problems, and in recent years it has served as the foundation for a plethora of cryptographic applications. Unfortunately, these applications are rather inefficient due to an inherent quadratic overhead in the use of LWE. A main open question was whether LWE and its applications could be made truly efficient by exploiting extra algebraic structure, as was done for lattice-based hash functions (and related primitives). We resolve this question in the affirmative by introducing an algebraic variant of LWE called ring-LWE, and proving that it too enjoys very strong hardness guarantees. Specifically, we show that the ring-LWE distribution is pseudorandom, assuming that worst-case problems on ideal lattices are hard for polynomial-time quantum algorithms. Applications include the first truly practical lattice-based public-key cryptosystem with an efficient security reduction; moreover, many of the other applications of LWE can be made much more efficient through the use of ring-LWE. 1

•Jan 1, 2012•11 citations

On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings

Vadim Lyubashevsky, Chris Peikert, Oded Regev

The “learning with errors” (LWE) problem is to distinguish random linear equations, which have been perturbed by a small amount of noise, from truly uniform ones. The problem has been shown to be as hard as worst-case lattice problems, and in recent years it has served as the foundation for a plethora of cryptographic applications. Unfortunately, these applications are rather inefficient due to an inherent quadratic overhead in the use of LWE. A main open question was whether LWE and its applications could be made truly efficient by exploiting extra algebraic structure, as was done for lattice-based hash functions (and related primitives). We resolve this question in the affirmative by introducing an algebraic variant of LWE called ring-LWE , and proving that it too enjoys very strong hardness guarantees. Specifically, we show that the ring-LWE distribution is pseudorandom, assuming that worst-case problems on ideal lattices are hard for polynomial-time quantum algorithms. Applications include the first truly practical lattice-based public-key cryptosystem with an efficient security reduction; moreover, many of the other applications of LWE can be made much more efficient through the use of ring-LWE.

Journal of the ACM•Nov 1, 2013•842 citations

Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions for Module Lattices.

Adeline Roux-Langlois, Damien Stehlé

Abstract. Most lattice-based cryptographic schemes are built upon the assumed hardness of the Short Integer Solution (SIS) and Learning With Errors (LWE) problems. Their efficiencies can be drastically improved by switching the hardness assumptions to the more compact Ring-SIS and Ring-LWE problems. However, this change of hardness assumptions comes along with a possible security weakening: SIS and LWE are known to be at least as hard as standard (worst-case) problems on euclidean lattices, whereas Ring-SIS and Ring-LWE are only known to be as hard as their restrictions to special classes of ideal lattices, corresponding to ideals of some polynomial rings. In this work, we define the Module-SIS and Module-LWE problems, which bridge SIS with Ring-SIS, and LWE with Ring-LWE, respectively. We prove that these average-case problems are at least as hard as standard lattice problems restricted to module lattices (which themselves generalize arbitrary and ideal lattices). As these new problems enlarge the toolbox of the lattice-based cryptographer, they could prove useful for designing new schemes. Importantly, the worst-case to average-case reductions for the module problems are (qualitatively) sharp, in the sense that there exist converse reductions. This property is not known to hold in the context of Ring-SIS/Ring-LWE: Ideal lattice problems could reveal easy without impacting the hardness of Ring-SIS/Ring-LWE. 1

•Jan 1, 2012•8 citations

Classical Hardness of Learning with Errors

Zvika Brakerski, Adeline Roux-Langlois, Chris Peikert +2 more

We show that the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem is classically at least as hard as standard worst-case lattice problems, even with polynomial modulus. Previously this was only known under quantum reductions. Our techniques capture the tradeoff between the dimension and the modulus of LWE instances, leading to a much better understanding of the landscape of the problem. The proof is inspired by techniques from several recent cryptographic constructions, most notably fully homomorphic encryption schemes.

arXiv:1306.0281•Jun 3, 2013•36 citations

Learning with Correlated Errors: A New Lattice Hard Problem with Worst-Case Reductions and Public-Key Encryption

Kishore K

We introduce Learning with Correlated Errors (LCE), a new lattice-based computationalhardness assumption in which observed samples carry noise generated by a low-rank linearcorrelation structure. Formally, given samples (A, b = As + Ce0 + e1 mod q), whereC ∈ Zm×rq is a publicly known correlation matrix and e0, e1 are short Gaussian vectors, thetask is to recover the secret s.Unlike LWE, the noise in LCE is globally correlated: up to r independent root noise sourcesdrive m observations simultaneously. Unlike the recent hybrid sparse-small assumptions ofGhosal et al. [GJL+25], LCE preserves a lattice structure that enables a reduction from theLearning with Errors (LWE) problem, thereby inheriting its worst-case hardness guarantees.We prove: (1) Worst-case hardness via reduction: We give a polynomial-timereduction from Decision-LWE to Decision-LCE, establishing that LCE is at least as hardas LWE and thereby inheriting its worst-case lattice hardness guarantees. (2) Search-to-Decision reduction: Search-LCE and Decision-LCE are polynomial-time equivalent (viaan explicit n-hybrid argument). (3) Cryptographic construction: an IND-CPA-securepublic-key encryption scheme from Decision-LCE. (4) Quantum resistance: by composingour reduction with Regev’s quantum reduction, we show that LCE resists known quantumattacks, with quantum lattice sieving requiring an estimated 20.265n quantum gates (matchingthe estimated cost for standard LWE).LCE provides a new, independently motivated hardness foundation for post-quantumcryptography and adds meaningful assumption diversity beyond LWE and LPN.

•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations

Pseudorandomness of ring-LWE for any ring and modulus

Chris Peikert, Oded Regev, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

We give a polynomial-time quantum reduction from worst-case (ideal) lattice problems directly to decision (Ring-)LWE. This extends to decision all the worst-case hardness results that were previously known for the search version, for the same or even better parameters and with no algebraic restrictions on the modulus or number field. Indeed, our reduction is the first that works for decision Ring-LWE with any number field and any modulus.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 15, 2017•178 citations
Abstract. The decision Learning With Errors problem has proven an extremely flexible foundation for devising provably secure cryptographic primitives. LWE can be expressed in terms of linear algebra over Z/qZ. This modulus q is the subject of study of the present work. When q is prime and small, or when it is exponential and composite with small factors, LWE is known to be at least as hard as standard worst-case problems over euclidean lattices (sometimes using quantum reductions). The Ring Learning With Errors problem is a structured variant of LWE allowing for more compact keys and more efficient primitives. It is known to be at least as hard as standard worst-case problems restricted to so-called ideal lattices, but under even more restrictive arithmetic conditions on q. In this work, we prove that the arithmetic form of the modulus q is irrelevant to the computational hardness of LWE and RLWE. More precisely, we show that these problems are at least as hard as standard worst-case problems on lattices, under the unique condition that q is of polynomial bit-size. This result is most useful for adapting LWE-based cryptographic constructions to the RLWE setting. Among others, this allows us to derive the first Identity-Based Encryption scheme of quasi-optimal performance proven secure under standard worst-case lattice assumptions, in the standard model. Other applications include authentication, functional encryption and traitor tracing.
The “learning with errors ” (LWE) problem is to distinguish random linear equations, which have been perturbed by a small amount of noise, from truly uniform ones. The problem has been shown to be as hard as worst-case lattice problems, and in recent years it has served as the foundation for a plethora of cryptographic applications. Unfortunately, these applications are rather inefficient due to an inherent quadratic overhead in the use of LWE. A main open question was whether LWE and its applications could be made truly efficient by exploiting extra algebraic structure, as was done for lattice-based hash functions (and related primitives). We resolve this question in the affirmative by introducing an algebraic variant of LWE called ring-LWE, and proving that it too enjoys very strong hardness guarantees. Specifically, we show that the ring-LWE distribution is pseudorandom, assuming that worst-case problems on ideal lattices are hard for polynomial-time quantum algorithms. Applications include the first truly practical lattice-based public-key cryptosystem with an efficient security reduction; moreover, many of the other applications of LWE can be made much more efficient through the use of ring-LWE. 1
The “learning with errors” (LWE) problem is to distinguish random linear equations, which have been perturbed by a small amount of noise, from truly uniform ones. The problem has been shown to be as hard as worst-case lattice problems, and in recent years it has served as the foundation for a plethora of cryptographic applications. Unfortunately, these applications are rather inefficient due to an inherent quadratic overhead in the use of LWE. A main open question was whether LWE and its applications could be made truly efficient by exploiting extra algebraic structure, as was done for lattice-based hash functions (and related primitives). We resolve this question in the affirmative by introducing an algebraic variant of LWE called ring-LWE , and proving that it too enjoys very strong hardness guarantees. Specifically, we show that the ring-LWE distribution is pseudorandom, assuming that worst-case problems on ideal lattices are hard for polynomial-time quantum algorithms. Applications include the first truly practical lattice-based public-key cryptosystem with an efficient security reduction; moreover, many of the other applications of LWE can be made much more efficient through the use of ring-LWE.
Abstract. Most lattice-based cryptographic schemes are built upon the assumed hardness of the Short Integer Solution (SIS) and Learning With Errors (LWE) problems. Their efficiencies can be drastically improved by switching the hardness assumptions to the more compact Ring-SIS and Ring-LWE problems. However, this change of hardness assumptions comes along with a possible security weakening: SIS and LWE are known to be at least as hard as standard (worst-case) problems on euclidean lattices, whereas Ring-SIS and Ring-LWE are only known to be as hard as their restrictions to special classes of ideal lattices, corresponding to ideals of some polynomial rings. In this work, we define the Module-SIS and Module-LWE problems, which bridge SIS with Ring-SIS, and LWE with Ring-LWE, respectively. We prove that these average-case problems are at least as hard as standard lattice problems restricted to module lattices (which themselves generalize arbitrary and ideal lattices). As these new problems enlarge the toolbox of the lattice-based cryptographer, they could prove useful for designing new schemes. Importantly, the worst-case to average-case reductions for the module problems are (qualitatively) sharp, in the sense that there exist converse reductions. This property is not known to hold in the context of Ring-SIS/Ring-LWE: Ideal lattice problems could reveal easy without impacting the hardness of Ring-SIS/Ring-LWE. 1
We show that the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem is classically at least as hard as standard worst-case lattice problems, even with polynomial modulus. Previously this was only known under quantum reductions. Our techniques capture the tradeoff between the dimension and the modulus of LWE instances, leading to a much better understanding of the landscape of the problem. The proof is inspired by techniques from several recent cryptographic constructions, most notably fully homomorphic encryption schemes.
We introduce Learning with Correlated Errors (LCE), a new lattice-based computationalhardness assumption in which observed samples carry noise generated by a low-rank linearcorrelation structure. Formally, given samples (A, b = As + Ce0 + e1 mod q), whereC ∈ Zm×rq is a publicly known correlation matrix and e0, e1 are short Gaussian vectors, thetask is to recover the secret s.Unlike LWE, the noise in LCE is globally correlated: up to r independent root noise sourcesdrive m observations simultaneously. Unlike the recent hybrid sparse-small assumptions ofGhosal et al. [GJL+25], LCE preserves a lattice structure that enables a reduction from theLearning with Errors (LWE) problem, thereby inheriting its worst-case hardness guarantees.We prove: (1) Worst-case hardness via reduction: We give a polynomial-timereduction from Decision-LWE to Decision-LCE, establishing that LCE is at least as hardas LWE and thereby inheriting its worst-case lattice hardness guarantees. (2) Search-to-Decision reduction: Search-LCE and Decision-LCE are polynomial-time equivalent (viaan explicit n-hybrid argument). (3) Cryptographic construction: an IND-CPA-securepublic-key encryption scheme from Decision-LCE. (4) Quantum resistance: by composingour reduction with Regev’s quantum reduction, we show that LCE resists known quantumattacks, with quantum lattice sieving requiring an estimated 20.265n quantum gates (matchingthe estimated cost for standard LWE).LCE provides a new, independently motivated hardness foundation for post-quantumcryptography and adds meaningful assumption diversity beyond LWE and LPN.