Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity

Quantum and randomized communication complexity of XOR functions in the SMP model.

Yang Liu, Shengyu Zhang

Published Jan 1, 2013• 11 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Tight Bounds on Communication Complexity of Symmetric XOR Functions in One-Way and SMP Models

Ming Lam Leung, Yang Li, Shengyu Zhang

arXiv:1101.4555•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•13 citations

Dual polynomials and communication complexity of XOR functions.

Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Nikhil S. Mande

arXiv:1704.02537•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations

Quantum Versus Classical Simultaneity in Communication Complexity

Dmitry Gavinsky

This paper addresses two problems in the context of two-party communication complexity of functions. First, it concludes the line of research which can be viewed as demonstrating qualitative advantage of quantum communication in the three most common communication “layouts”: two-way interactive communication, one-way communication and simultaneous message passing (SMP). I demonstrate a functional (problem c̅E̅q̅T̅, whose communication complexity is O (log n)2) in the quantum version of the SMP and Ω̃ (√n) in the classical (randomized) version of SMP. Second, this paper contributes to understanding the power of the weakest commonly studied regime of quantum communication-SMP with quantum messages and without shared randomness (the latter restriction can be viewed as a somewhat artificial way of making the quantum model “as weak as possible”). Our function c̅E̅q̅T̅ has an efficient solution in this regime as well, which means that even lacking shared randomness, quantum SMP can be exponentially stronger than its classical counterpart with shared randomness.

arXiv:1705.07211•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•May 22, 2019•6 citations

Quantum Weakly Nondeterministic Communication Complexity

François Le Gall

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•7 citations

On the communication complexity of XOR functions

Ashley Montanaro, Tobias Osborne

An XOR function is a function of the form g(x,y) = f(x + y), for some boolean function f on n bits. We study the quantum and classical communication complexity of XOR functions. In the case of exact protocols, we completely characterise one-way communication complexity for all f. We also show that, when f is monotone, g's quantum and classical complexities are quadratically related, and that when f is a linear threshold function, g's quantum complexity is Theta(n). More generally, we make a structural conjecture about the Fourier spectra of boolean functions which, if true, would imply that the quantum and classical exact communication complexities of all XOR functions are asymptotically equivalent. We give two randomised classical protocols for general XOR functions which are efficient for certain functions, and a third protocol for linear threshold functions with high margin. These protocols operate in the symmetric message passing model with shared randomness.

arXiv:0909.3392•Sep 18, 2009•44 citations

Communication Complexities of XOR functions

Yaoyun Shi, Zhiqiang Zhang

We call $F:\{0, 1\}^n\times \{0, 1\}^n\to\{0, 1\}$ a symmetric XOR function if for a function $S:\{0, 1, ..., n\}\to\{0, 1\}$, $F(x, y)=S(|x\oplus y|)$, for any $x, y\in\{0, 1\}^n$, where $|x\oplus y|$ is the Hamming weight of the bit-wise XOR of $x$ and $y$. We show that for any such function, (a) the deterministic communication complexity is always $Θ(n)$ except for four simple functions that have a constant complexity, and (b) up to a polylog factor, the error-bounded randomized and quantum communication complexities are $Θ(r_0+r_1)$, where $r_0$ and $r_1$ are the minimum integers such that $r_0, r_1\leq n/2$ and $S(k)=S(k+2)$ for all $k\in[r_0, n-r_1)$.

arXiv:0808.1762•Aug 13, 2008•11 citations
This paper addresses two problems in the context of two-party communication complexity of functions. First, it concludes the line of research which can be viewed as demonstrating qualitative advantage of quantum communication in the three most common communication “layouts”: two-way interactive communication, one-way communication and simultaneous message passing (SMP). I demonstrate a functional (problem c̅E̅q̅T̅, whose communication complexity is O (log n)2) in the quantum version of the SMP and Ω̃ (√n) in the classical (randomized) version of SMP. Second, this paper contributes to understanding the power of the weakest commonly studied regime of quantum communication-SMP with quantum messages and without shared randomness (the latter restriction can be viewed as a somewhat artificial way of making the quantum model “as weak as possible”). Our function c̅E̅q̅T̅ has an efficient solution in this regime as well, which means that even lacking shared randomness, quantum SMP can be exponentially stronger than its classical counterpart with shared randomness.
An XOR function is a function of the form g(x,y) = f(x + y), for some boolean function f on n bits. We study the quantum and classical communication complexity of XOR functions. In the case of exact protocols, we completely characterise one-way communication complexity for all f. We also show that, when f is monotone, g's quantum and classical complexities are quadratically related, and that when f is a linear threshold function, g's quantum complexity is Theta(n). More generally, we make a structural conjecture about the Fourier spectra of boolean functions which, if true, would imply that the quantum and classical exact communication complexities of all XOR functions are asymptotically equivalent. We give two randomised classical protocols for general XOR functions which are efficient for certain functions, and a third protocol for linear threshold functions with high margin. These protocols operate in the symmetric message passing model with shared randomness.
We call F:{0,1}n×{0,1}n→{0,1}F:\{0, 1\}^n\times \{0, 1\}^n\to\{0, 1\}F:{0,1}n×{0,1}n→{0,1} a symmetric XOR function if for a function S:{0,1,...,n}→{0,1}S:\{0, 1, ..., n\}\to\{0, 1\}S:{0,1,...,n}→{0,1}, F(x,y)=S(∣x⊕y∣)F(x, y)=S(|x\oplus y|)F(x,y)=S(∣x⊕y∣), for any x,y∈{0,1}nx, y\in\{0, 1\}^nx,y∈{0,1}n, where ∣x⊕y∣|x\oplus y|∣x⊕y∣ is the Hamming weight of the bit-wise XOR of xxx and yyy. We show that for any such function, (a) the deterministic communication complexity is always Θ(n)Θ(n)Θ(n) except for four simple functions that have a constant complexity, and (b) up to a polylog factor, the error-bounded randomized and quantum communication complexities are Θ(r0+r1)Θ(r_0+r_1)Θ(r0​+r1​), where r0r_0r0​ and r1r_1r1​ are the minimum integers such that r0,r1≤n/2r_0, r_1\leq n/2r0​,r1​≤n/2 and S(k)=S(k+2)S(k)=S(k+2)S(k)=S(k+2) for all k∈[r0,n−r1)k\in[r_0, n-r_1)k∈[r0​,n−r1​).