Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On Communication Complexity of Perfectly Reliable and Secure Communication in Directed Networks.

Arpita Patra, Ashish Choudhary, Kannan Srinathan, Chandrasekharan Pandu Rangan

Published Jan 1, 2008• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Perfectly Reliable and Secure Communication in Directed Networks Tolerating Mixed Adversary

Arpita Patra, Ashish Choudhary, Kannan Srinathan +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Sep 5, 2007•9 citations

On the Communication Complexity of Reliable and Secure Message Transmission in Asynchronous Networks

Choudhary, Ashish, Arpita Patra

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

On the Communication Complexity of Reliable and Secure Message Transmission in Asynchronous Networks

Ashish Choudhury, Arpita Patra

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Perfectly Secure Communication in Directed Networks

Chwa Kyung Yong

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Simple and Communication Complexity Efficient Almost Secure and Perfectly Secure Message Transmission Schemes

Yvo Desmedt, Stelios Erotokritou, Reihaneh Safavi–Naini

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2010•13 citations

On The Communication Complexity of Perfectly Secure Message Transmission in Directed Networks.

Arpita Patra, Ashish Choudhary, Chandrasekharan Pandu Rangan

In this paper, we re-visit the problem of perfectly secure message transmission (PSMT) in a directed network under the presence of a threshold adaptive Byzantine adversary, having unbounded computing power. Desmedt et.al [5] have given the characterization for three or more phase PSMT protocols over directed networks. Recently, Patra et. al. [15] have given the characterization of two phase PSMT over directed networks. Even though the issue of tradeoff between phase complexity and communication complexity of PSMT protocols has been resolved in undirected networks, nothing is known in the literature regarding directed networks. In this paper, we completely settle down this issue. Specifically, we derive the lower bounds on communication complexity of (a) two phase PSMT protocols and (b) three or more phase PSMT protocols in directed networks. Moreover, we show that our lower bounds are asymptotically tight, by designing communication optimal PSMT protocols in directed networks, which are first of their kind. We re-visit the problem of perfectly reliable message transmission (PRMT) as well. Any PRMT protocol that sends a message containing ℓ field elements, has a trivial lower bound of Ω(ℓ) (field elements) on its communication complexity. Thus any PRMT protocol that sends a message of ℓ

•Jan 1, 2009•4 citations
In this paper, we re-visit the problem of perfectly secure message transmission (PSMT) in a directed network under the presence of a threshold adaptive Byzantine adversary, having unbounded computing power. Desmedt et.al [5] have given the characterization for three or more phase PSMT protocols over directed networks. Recently, Patra et. al. [15] have given the characterization of two phase PSMT over directed networks. Even though the issue of tradeoff between phase complexity and communication complexity of PSMT protocols has been resolved in undirected networks, nothing is known in the literature regarding directed networks. In this paper, we completely settle down this issue. Specifically, we derive the lower bounds on communication complexity of (a) two phase PSMT protocols and (b) three or more phase PSMT protocols in directed networks. Moreover, we show that our lower bounds are asymptotically tight, by designing communication optimal PSMT protocols in directed networks, which are first of their kind. We re-visit the problem of perfectly reliable message transmission (PRMT) as well. Any PRMT protocol that sends a message containing ℓ field elements, has a trivial lower bound of Ω(ℓ) (field elements) on its communication complexity. Thus any PRMT protocol that sends a message of ℓ