i (:)-OT, (one-out-of-two Bit Oblivious Transfer) is a technique by which a party S owning two secret bits b,bl, can transfer one of them b, to another party R, who chooses c. This is done in a way that does not release any bias about bz to R nor any bias about c to S. How can one build a 2TO-(i) ((;)-OT2 from R to S) given a (i)-OT, (from S to a)? This question is interesting because in many scenarios, one of the two parties will be much more powerful than the other. In the current paper we answer this question and show a number of related extensions. One interesting extension of this transfer is the (:)-OTk (one-out-of-two String O.T.) in which the two secrets qo, q1 are elements of CFk(2) instead of bits. We show that $TO-(:) can be obtained at about the same cost as (3-OT:, in terms of number of cab to (i)-OTz.
i (:)-OT, (one-out-of-two Bit Oblivious Transfer) is a technique by which a party S owning two secret bits b,bl, can transfer one of them b, to another party R, who chooses c. This is done in a way that does not release any bias about bz to R nor any bias about c to S. How can one build a 2TO-(i) ((;)-OT2 from R to S) given a (i)-OT, (from S to a)? This question is interesting because in many scenarios, one of the two parties will be much more powerful than the other. In the current paper we answer this question and show a number of related extensions. One interesting extension of this transfer is the (:)-OTk (one-out-of-two String O.T.) in which the two secrets qo, q1 are elements of CFk(2) instead of bits. We show that $TO-(:) can be obtained at about the same cost as (3-OT:, in terms of number of cab to (i)-OTz.
Assume A owns t secret k--bit strings. She is willing to disclose one of them to B, at his choosing, provided he does not learn anything about the other strings. Conversely, B does not want A to learn which secret he chose to learn. A protocol for the above task is said to implement One-out-of-t String Oblivious Transfer, denoted ( t 1 )--OT k 2 . This primitive is particularly useful in a variety of cryptographic settings. An apparently simpler task corresponds to the case k = 1 and t = 2 of two one-bit secrets: this is known as One-out-of-two Bit Oblivious Transfer, denoted ( 2 1 )--OT 2 . We address the question of implementing ( t 1 )--OT k 2 assuming the existence of a ( 2 1 )--OT 2 . In particular, we prove that unconditionally secure ( 2 1 )--OT k 2 can be implemented from \\Theta(k) calls to ( 2 1 )--OT 2 . This is optimal up to a small multiplicative constant. Our solution is based on the notion of self-intersecting codes. Of independent interest, we give several...
Assume A owns t secret k-bit strings. She is willing to disclose one of them to B, at his choosing, provided he does not learn anything about the other strings. Conversely, B does not want A to learn which secret he chose to learn. A protocol for the above task is said to implement one-out-of-t string oblivious transfer, denoted (/sup t//sub 1/)-OT/sup k//sub 2/. This primitive is particularly useful in a variety of cryptographic settings. An apparently simpler task corresponds to the case k=1 and t=2 of two 1-bit secrets: this is known as one-out-of-two bit oblivious transfer, denoted (/sup 2//sub 1/)-OT/sub 2/. We address the question of implementing (/sup t//sub 1/)-OT/sup k//sub 2/ assuming the existence of a (/sup 2//sub 1/)-OT/sub 2/. In particular, we prove that unconditionally secure (/sup 2//sub 1/)-OT/sup k//sub 2/ can be implemented from /spl Theta/(k) calls to (/sup 2//sub 1/)-OT/sub 2/. This is optimal up to a small multiplicative constant. Our solution is based on the notion of self-intersecting codes. Of independent interest, we give several efficient new constructions for such codes. Another contribution of this paper is a set of information-theoretic definitions for correctness and privacy of unconditionally secure oblivious transfer.
Oblivious transfer (OT) is an important tool in cryptography. It serves as a subroutine to other complex procedures of both theoretical and practical significance. A common attribute of OT protocols is that one party (Alice) has to send a message to another party (Bob) and has to stay oblivious to whether Bob did receive the message. Specific (OT) protocols vary by exact definition of the task---in the all-or-nothing protocol, Alice sends a single bit-string message, which Bob is able to read with only 50 probability, whereas in a 1-out-of-2 OT protocol Bob reads one out of two messages sent by Alice. These two flavors of protocol are known to be equivalent. Recently, a computationally secure all-or-nothing OT protocol based on quantum states was developed by A. Souto et al. [Phys. Rev. A 91, 042306 (2015)], which, however, cannot be reduced to a 1-out-of-2 OT protocol by standard means. Here we present an elaborate reduction of this protocol that retains the security of the original.
Oblivious transfer, a central functionality in modern cryptography, allows a party to send two one-bit messages to another who can choose one of them to read, remaining ignorant about the other, whereas the sender does not learn the receiver's choice. Oblivious transfer the security of which is information-theoretic for both parties is known impossible to achieve from scratch. The joint behavior of certain bi-partite quantum states is non-local, i.e., cannot be explained by shared classical information. In order to better understand such behavior, which is classically explainable only by communication, but does not allow for it, Popescu and Rohrlich have described a "non-locality machine": Two parties both input a bit, and both get a random output bit the XOR of which is the AND of the input bits. We show a close connection, in a cryptographic sense, between OT and the "PR primitive." More specifically, unconditional OT can be achieved from a single realization of PR, and vice versa. Our reductions, which are single-copy, information-theoretic, and perfect, also lead to a simple and optimal protocol allowing for inverting the direction of OT
Oblivious transfer (OT) is one of the most fundamental primitives in cryptography and is widely used in protocols for secure two-party and multi-party computation. As secure com-putation becomes more practical, the need for practical large scale oblivious transfer protocols is becoming more evident. Oblivious transfer extensions are protocols that enable a relatively small number of “base-OTs ” to be utilized to compute a very large number of OTs at low cost. In the semi-honest setting, Ishai et al. (CRYPTO 2003) presented an OT extension protocol for which the cost of each OT (beyond the base-OTs) is just a few hash function operations. In the malicious setting, Nielsen et al. (CRYPTO 2012) presented an efficient OT extension protocol for the setting of active adversaries, that is secure in the random oracle model. In this work, we present an OT extension protocol for the setting of malicious adversaries that is more efficient and uses less communication than previous works. In addition, our protocol can be proven secure in both the random oracle model, and in the standard model with a type of correlation robustness. Given the importance of OT in many secure computation protocols, increasing the efficiency of OT extensions is another important step forward to making secure
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is an essential tool in cryptography that provides a wide range of applications such as secure multi-party computation, private information retrieval, private set intersection, contract signing, and privacy-preserving location-based services. The OT protocol has different variants such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. In the OT (one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , and OT extension) protocol, the sender has a set of messages, whereas the receiver has a key. The receiver sends that key to the sender in a secure way; the sender cannot get any information about the received key. The sender encrypts every message by operating on every message using the received key and sends all the encrypted messages to the receiver. The receiver is able to extract only the required message using his key. However, in the k -out-of- n OT protocol, the receiver sends a set of k keys to the sender, and in replay, the sender sends all the encrypted messages. The receiver uses his keys and extracts the required messages, but it cannot gain any information about the messages that it has not requested. Generally, the OT protocol requires high communication and computation cost if we transfer millions of oblivious messages. The OT extension protocol provides a solution for this, where the receiver transfers a set of keys to the sender by executing a few numbers of OT protocols. Then, the sender encrypts all the messages using cheap symmetric key cryptography with the help of a received set of keys and transfers millions of oblivious messages to the receiver. In this work, we present different variants of OT protocols such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. Furthermore, we cover various aspects of theoretical security guarantees such as semi-honest and malicious adversaries, universally composable, used techniques, computation, and communication efficiency aspects. From the analysis, we found that the semi-honest adversary-based OT protocols required low communication and computation costs as compared to malicious adversary-based OT protocols.