Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity

How To Play Almost Any Mental Game Over The Net - Concurrent Composition via Super-Polynomial Simulation

Boaz Barak, Amit Sahai

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We construct a secure protocol for any multi-party functionality that remains secure (under a relaxed definition of security) when executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and other protocols. We stress that we do not use any assumptions on existence of trusted parties, common reference string, honest majority or synchronicity of the network. The relaxation of security, introduced by Prabhakaran and Sahai (STOC ’04), is obtained by allowing the idealmodel simulator to run in quai-polynomial (as opposed to polynomial) time. Quasi-polynomial simulation suffices to ensure security for most applications of multi-party computation. Furthermore, Lindell (FOCS ’03, TCC ’ 04) recently showed that such a protocol is impossible to obtain under the more standard definition of polynomial-time simulation by an ideal adversary. Our construction is the first such protocol under reasonably standard cryptographic assumptions. That is, existence of a hash function collection that is collision resistent with respect to circuits of subexponential size, and existence of trapdoor permutations that are secure with respect to circuits of quasi-polynomial size. We introduce a new technique: “protocol condensing”. That is, taking a protocol that has strong security properties but requires super-polynomial communication and computation, and

Related papers

How To Play Almost Any Mental Game Over The Net - Concurrent Composition via Super-Polynomial Simulation

Boaz Barak, Amit Sahai

We construct a secure protocol for any multiparty functionality that remains secure (under a relaxed definition of security introduced by Prabhakaran and Sahai (STOC '04)) when executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and other protocols, without any assumptions on existence of trusted parties, common reference string, honest majority or synchronicity of the network. The relaxation of security is obtained by allowing the ideal-model simulator to run in quasipolynomial (as opposed to polynomial) time. Quasipolynomial simulation suffices to ensure security for most applications of multiparty computation. Furthermore, Lindell (FOCS '03, TCC' 04) recently showed that such a protocol is impossible to obtain under the more standard definition of polynomial-time simulation by an ideal adversary. Our construction is the first such protocol under reasonably standard cryptographic assumptions (i.e., existence of a hash function collection that is collision resistent with respect to circuits of subexponential size, and existence of trapdoor permutations which are secure with respect to circuits of quasi-polynomial size). We introduce a new technique: "protocol condensing". That is, taking a protocol that has strong security properties but requires super-polynomial communication and computation, and then transforming it into a protocol with polynomial communication and computation, that still inherits the strong security properties of the original protocol. Our result is obtained by combining this technique with previous techniques of Canetti, Lindell, Ostrovsky, and Sahai (STOC '02) and Pass (STOC '04).

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Nov 15, 2005•109 citations

How to Play ANY Mental Game Over the Net Concurrently composable secure computation without setup assumptions

Boaz Barak, Amit Sahai

We construct a protocol for general multi-party computation that remains secure even if executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and of arbitrary other protocols. This is the first such construction that is based on standard cryptographic assumptions and does not require setup conditions such as the existence of a common reference string. Furthermore, our protocol utilizes only a constant number of communication rounds and remains secure also with respect to adaptive adversaries (without using memory erasures). The security of our protocol is demonstrated by a simulator with a quasi-polynomial simulation overhead, as opposed to the standard notion of polynomial simulation. However, quasipolynomial simulation still provides sufficient security for almost all applications. Furthermore, it was previously shown that there does not exist such a protocol with polynomial simulation

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Bounded-concurrent secure multi-party computation with a dishonest majority

Rafael Pass

We show how to securely realize any multi-party functionality in a way that preserves security under an a-priori bounded number of concurrent executions, regardless of the number of corrupted parties. Previous protocols for the above task either rely on set-up assumptions such as a Common Reference String, or require an honest majority. Our constructions are in the plain model and rely on standard intractability assumptions (enhanced trapdoor permutations and collision resistant hash functions). Even though our main focus is on feasibility of concurrent multi-party computation we actually obtain a protocol using only a constant number of communication rounds. As a consequence our protocol yields the first construction of constant-round phstand-alone secure multi-party computation with a dishonest majority, proven secure under standard (polynomial-time) hardness assumptions; previous solutions to this task either require logarithmic round-complexity, or subexponential hardness assumptions. The core of our protocol is a novel construction of (concurrently) simulation-sound zero-knowledge protocols, which might be of independent interest. Finally, we extend the framework constructed to give a protocol for secure multi-party (and thus two-party) computation for any number of corrupted parties, which remains secure even when arbitrary subsets of parties concurrently execute the protocol, possibly with interchangeable roles. As far as we know, for the case of two-party or multi-party protocols with a dishonest majority, this is the first positive result for any non-trivial functionality which achieves this property in the plain model.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 13, 2004•183 citations

Protocols for Bounded-Concurrent Secure Two-Party Computation in the Plain Model.

Yehuda Lindell

Until recently, most research on the topic of secure computation focused on the stand-alone model, where a single protocol execution takes place. In this paper, we construct protocols for the setting of bounded-concurrent self composition, where a (single) secure protocol is run many times concurrently, and there is a predetermined bound on the number of concurrent executions. In short, we show that any two-party functionality can be securely computed under boundedconcurrent self composition, in the plain model (where the only setup assumption made is that the parties communicate via authenticated channels). Our protocol provides the first feasibility result for general two-party computation in the plain model, for any model of concurrency. All previous protocols assumed a trusted setup phase in order to obtain a common reference string. On the downside, the number of rounds of communication in our protocol is super-linear in the bound on the number of concurrent executions. However, we believe that our constructions will lead to more efficient protocols for this task.

•Jan 1, 2003•6 citations

Bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation in a constant number of rounds

Rafael Pass, Alon Rosen

We consider the problem of constructing a general protocol for secure two-party computation in a way that preserves security under concurrent composition. In our treatment, we focus on the case where an a-priori bound on the number of concurrent sessions is specified before the protocol is constructed. (a.k.a. bounded concurrency). We make no setup assumptions. Lindel (STOC 2003) has shown that any protocol for bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation, whose security is established via black-box simulation, must have round complexity that is strictly larger than the bound on the number of concurrent sessions. In this paper, we construct a (non black-box) protocol for realizing bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation in a constant number of rounds. Our constructions rely on the existence of enhanced trapdoor permutations, as well as on the existence of hash functions that are collision-resistant against subexponential sized circuits.

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Mar 1, 2004•87 citations

Secure Multiparty Computation with Partial Fairness

Amos Beimel, Eran Omri, Ilan Orlov

A protocol for computing a functionality is secure if an adversary in this protocol cannot cause more harm than in an ideal computation where parties give their inputs to a trusted party which returns the output of the functionality to all parties. In particular, in the ideal model such computation is fair -- all parties get the output. Cleve (STOC 1986) proved that, in general, fairness is not possible without an honest majority. To overcome this impossibility, Gordon and Katz (Eurocrypt 2010) suggested a relaxed definition -- 1/p-secure computation -- which guarantees partial fairness. For two parties, they construct 1/p-secure protocols for functionalities for which the size of either their domain or their range is polynomial (in the security parameter). Gordon and Katz ask whether their results can be extended to multiparty protocols. We study 1/p-secure protocols in the multiparty setting for general functionalities. Our main result is constructions of 1/p-secure protocols when the number of parties is constant provided that less than 2/3 of the parties are corrupt. Our protocols require that either (1) the functionality is deterministic and the size of the domain is polynomial (in the security parameter), or (2) the functionality can be randomized and the size of the range is polynomial. If the size of the domain is constant and the functionality is deterministic, then our protocol is efficient even when the number of parties is O(log log n) (where n is the security parameter). On the negative side, we show that when the number of parties is super-constant, 1/p-secure protocols are not possible when the size of the domain is polynomial.

arXiv:1011.5567•Nov 25, 2010•0 citations
We construct a secure protocol for any multi-party functionality that remains secure (under a relaxed definition of security) when executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and other protocols. We stress that we do not use any assumptions on existence of trusted parties, common reference string, honest majority or synchronicity of the network. The relaxation of security, introduced by Prabhakaran and Sahai (STOC ’04), is obtained by allowing the idealmodel simulator to run in quai-polynomial (as opposed to polynomial) time. Quasi-polynomial simulation suffices to ensure security for most applications of multi-party computation. Furthermore, Lindell (FOCS ’03, TCC ’ 04) recently showed that such a protocol is impossible to obtain under the more standard definition of polynomial-time simulation by an ideal adversary. Our construction is the first such protocol under reasonably standard cryptographic assumptions. That is, existence of a hash function collection that is collision resistent with respect to circuits of subexponential size, and existence of trapdoor permutations that are secure with respect to circuits of quasi-polynomial size. We introduce a new technique: “protocol condensing”. That is, taking a protocol that has strong security properties but requires super-polynomial communication and computation, and
We construct a secure protocol for any multiparty functionality that remains secure (under a relaxed definition of security introduced by Prabhakaran and Sahai (STOC '04)) when executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and other protocols, without any assumptions on existence of trusted parties, common reference string, honest majority or synchronicity of the network. The relaxation of security is obtained by allowing the ideal-model simulator to run in quasipolynomial (as opposed to polynomial) time. Quasipolynomial simulation suffices to ensure security for most applications of multiparty computation. Furthermore, Lindell (FOCS '03, TCC' 04) recently showed that such a protocol is impossible to obtain under the more standard definition of polynomial-time simulation by an ideal adversary. Our construction is the first such protocol under reasonably standard cryptographic assumptions (i.e., existence of a hash function collection that is collision resistent with respect to circuits of subexponential size, and existence of trapdoor permutations which are secure with respect to circuits of quasi-polynomial size). We introduce a new technique: "protocol condensing". That is, taking a protocol that has strong security properties but requires super-polynomial communication and computation, and then transforming it into a protocol with polynomial communication and computation, that still inherits the strong security properties of the original protocol. Our result is obtained by combining this technique with previous techniques of Canetti, Lindell, Ostrovsky, and Sahai (STOC '02) and Pass (STOC '04).
We construct a protocol for general multi-party computation that remains secure even if executed concurrently with multiple copies of itself and of arbitrary other protocols. This is the first such construction that is based on standard cryptographic assumptions and does not require setup conditions such as the existence of a common reference string. Furthermore, our protocol utilizes only a constant number of communication rounds and remains secure also with respect to adaptive adversaries (without using memory erasures). The security of our protocol is demonstrated by a simulator with a quasi-polynomial simulation overhead, as opposed to the standard notion of polynomial simulation. However, quasipolynomial simulation still provides sufficient security for almost all applications. Furthermore, it was previously shown that there does not exist such a protocol with polynomial simulation
We show how to securely realize any multi-party functionality in a way that preserves security under an a-priori bounded number of concurrent executions, regardless of the number of corrupted parties. Previous protocols for the above task either rely on set-up assumptions such as a Common Reference String, or require an honest majority. Our constructions are in the plain model and rely on standard intractability assumptions (enhanced trapdoor permutations and collision resistant hash functions). Even though our main focus is on feasibility of concurrent multi-party computation we actually obtain a protocol using only a constant number of communication rounds. As a consequence our protocol yields the first construction of constant-round phstand-alone secure multi-party computation with a dishonest majority, proven secure under standard (polynomial-time) hardness assumptions; previous solutions to this task either require logarithmic round-complexity, or subexponential hardness assumptions. The core of our protocol is a novel construction of (concurrently) simulation-sound zero-knowledge protocols, which might be of independent interest. Finally, we extend the framework constructed to give a protocol for secure multi-party (and thus two-party) computation for any number of corrupted parties, which remains secure even when arbitrary subsets of parties concurrently execute the protocol, possibly with interchangeable roles. As far as we know, for the case of two-party or multi-party protocols with a dishonest majority, this is the first positive result for any non-trivial functionality which achieves this property in the plain model.
Until recently, most research on the topic of secure computation focused on the stand-alone model, where a single protocol execution takes place. In this paper, we construct protocols for the setting of bounded-concurrent self composition, where a (single) secure protocol is run many times concurrently, and there is a predetermined bound on the number of concurrent executions. In short, we show that any two-party functionality can be securely computed under boundedconcurrent self composition, in the plain model (where the only setup assumption made is that the parties communicate via authenticated channels). Our protocol provides the first feasibility result for general two-party computation in the plain model, for any model of concurrency. All previous protocols assumed a trusted setup phase in order to obtain a common reference string. On the downside, the number of rounds of communication in our protocol is super-linear in the bound on the number of concurrent executions. However, we believe that our constructions will lead to more efficient protocols for this task.
We consider the problem of constructing a general protocol for secure two-party computation in a way that preserves security under concurrent composition. In our treatment, we focus on the case where an a-priori bound on the number of concurrent sessions is specified before the protocol is constructed. (a.k.a. bounded concurrency). We make no setup assumptions. Lindel (STOC 2003) has shown that any protocol for bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation, whose security is established via black-box simulation, must have round complexity that is strictly larger than the bound on the number of concurrent sessions. In this paper, we construct a (non black-box) protocol for realizing bounded-concurrent secure two-party computation in a constant number of rounds. Our constructions rely on the existence of enhanced trapdoor permutations, as well as on the existence of hash functions that are collision-resistant against subexponential sized circuits.
A protocol for computing a functionality is secure if an adversary in this protocol cannot cause more harm than in an ideal computation where parties give their inputs to a trusted party which returns the output of the functionality to all parties. In particular, in the ideal model such computation is fair -- all parties get the output. Cleve (STOC 1986) proved that, in general, fairness is not possible without an honest majority. To overcome this impossibility, Gordon and Katz (Eurocrypt 2010) suggested a relaxed definition -- 1/p-secure computation -- which guarantees partial fairness. For two parties, they construct 1/p-secure protocols for functionalities for which the size of either their domain or their range is polynomial (in the security parameter). Gordon and Katz ask whether their results can be extended to multiparty protocols. We study 1/p-secure protocols in the multiparty setting for general functionalities. Our main result is constructions of 1/p-secure protocols when the number of parties is constant provided that less than 2/3 of the parties are corrupt. Our protocols require that either (1) the functionality is deterministic and the size of the domain is polynomial (in the security parameter), or (2) the functionality can be randomized and the size of the range is polynomial. If the size of the domain is constant and the functionality is deterministic, then our protocol is efficient even when the number of parties is O(log log n) (where n is the security parameter). On the negative side, we show that when the number of parties is super-constant, 1/p-secure protocols are not possible when the size of the domain is polynomial.