Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the Security of Protocols with Logarithmic Communication Complexity

Michael Backes A, Dominique Unruh

Published Jan 1, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Abstract. We investigate the security of protocols with logarithmic communication complexity. We show that for the security definitions with environment, i.e., Reactive Simulatability and Universal Composability, computational security of logarithmic protocols implies statistical security. The same holds for advantage-based security definitions as commonly used for individual primitives. While this matches the folklore that logarithmic protocols cannot be computationally secure unless they are already statistically secure, we show that under realistic complexity assumptions, this folklore does surprisingly not hold for the stand-alone model without auxiliary input, i.e., there are logarithmic protocols that are statistically insecure but computationally secure in this model. The proof is conducted by showing how to transform an instance of an NP-complete problem into a protocol with two properties: There exists an adversary such that the protocol is statistically insecure in the stand-alone model, and given such an adversary we can find a witness for the problem instance, hence yielding a computationally secure protocol assuming the hardness of finding a witness. The proof relies on a novel technique that establishes a link between cryptographic definitions and foundations of computational

Related papers

On the Notion of Statistical Security in Simulatability Definitions.

Dennis Hofheinz, Dominique Unruh

Abstract. We investigate the definition of statistical security (i.e., security against unbounded adversaries) in the framework of reactive simulatability. This framework allows to formulate and analyze multi-party protocols modularly by providing a composition theorem for protocols. However, we show that the notion of statistical security, as defined by Backes, Pfitzmann and Waidner for the reactive simulatability framework, does not allow for secure composition of protocols. This in particular invalidates the proof of the composition theorem. We give evidence that the reason for the non-composability of statistical security is no artifact of the framework itself, but of the particular formulation of statistical security. Therefore, we give a modified notion of statistical security in the reactive simulatability framework. We prove that this notion allows for secure composition of protocols. As to the best of our knowledge, no formal definition of statistical security has been fixed for Canetti’s universal composability framework, we believe that our observations and results can also help to avoid potential pitfalls there.

•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Information-Theoretically Secure Protocols and Security Under Composition.

Eyal Kushilevitz Z, Yehuda Lindell, Tal Rabin

We investigate the question of whether security of protocols in the information-theoretic setting (where the adversary is computationally unbounded) implies the security of these protocols under concurrent composition. This question is motivated by the folklore that all known protocols that are secure in the information-theoretic setting are indeed secure under concurrent composition. We provide answers to this question for a number of different settings (i.e., considering perfect versus statistical security, and concurrent composition with adaptive versus fixed inputs). Our results enhance the understanding of what is necessary for obtaining security under composition, as well as providing tools (i.e., composition theorems) that can be used for proving the security of protocols under composition while considering only the standard stand-alone definitions of security.

•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

Secure Computation Without Authentication.

Boaz Barak, Ran Canetti, Yehuda Lindell +2 more

Abstract. In the setting of secure multiparty computation, a set of parties wish to jointly compute some function of their inputs. Such a computation must preserve certain security properties, like privacy and correctness, even if some of the participating parties or an external adversary collude to attack the honest parties. Until this paper, all protocols for general secure computation assumed that the parties can communicate reliably via authenticated channels. In this paper, we consider the feasibility of secure computation without any setup assumption. We consider a completely unauthenticated setting, where all messages sent by the parties may be tampered with and modified by the adversary (without the honest parties being able to detect this fact). In this model, it is not possible to achieve the same level of security as in the authenticated-channel setting. Nevertheless, we show that meaningful security guarantees can be provided. In particular, we define a relaxed notion of what it means to “securely compute ” a function in the unauthenticated setting. Then, we construct protocols for securely realizing any functionality in the stand-alone model, with no setup assumptions whatsoever. In addition, we construct universally composable protocols for securely realizing any functionality in the common reference string model (while still in an unauthenticated network). We also show that our protocols can be used to provide conceptually simple and unified solutions to a number of problems that were studied separately in the past, including password-based authenticated key exchange and non-malleable commitments. 1

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

On the Composability of Statistically Secure Bit Commitments.

Rafael Dowsley, Jeroen van de Graaf, Jörn Müller‐Quade +1 more

We show that for bit commitment schemes based on two-party stateless primitives, the stand-alone statistical security implies the statistical universally composable security. I.e. all such schemes are secure with an unlimited adversary, an unlimited simulator and an unlimited environment machine in the universal composability framework. Especially, these protocols can be used in arbitrary statistically secure applications without lowering the security.

•Jan 1, 2008•2 citations

Information-Theoretically Secure Protocols and Security under Composition

Eyal Kushilevitz Z, Yehuda Lindell, Tal Rabin

We investigate the question of whether the security of protocols in the information-theoretic setting (where the adversary is computationally unbounded) implies the security of these protocols under concurrent composition. This question is motivated by the folklore that all known protocols that are secure in the information-theoretic setting are indeed secure under concurrent composition. We provide answers to this question for a number of different settings (i.e., considering perfect versus statistical security, and concurrent composition with adaptive versus fixed inputs). Our results enhance the understanding of what is necessary for obtaining security under composition, as well as providing tools (i.e., composition theorems) that can be used for proving the security of protocols under composition while considering only the standard stand-alone definitions of security.

SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2010•71 citations

Efficient Oblivious Polynomial Evaluation with Simulation-Based Security.

Carmit Hazay, Yehuda Lindell

The study of secure multiparty computation has yielded powerful feasibility results showing that any efficient functionality can be securely computed in the presence of malicious adversaries. Despite this, there are few problems of specific interest for which we have highly efficient protocols that are secure in the presence of malicious adversaries under full simulation based definitions (following the ideal/real model paradigm). Due to the difficulties of constructing such protocols, many researchers have resorted to weaker definitions of security and weaker adversary models. In this paper, we construct highly efficient protocols for the well-studied problem of oblivious polynomial evaluation. Our protocol is secure under standard cryptographic assumptions for the settings of malicious adversaries, and readily transform to protocols that are secure under universal composability and in the presence of covert adversaries. Our protocol is constant round and requires O(d · s) exponentiations, where d is the degree of the polynomial and s is a statistical security parameter (that should equal about 160 in practice).

•Jan 1, 2009•26 citations
Abstract. We investigate the security of protocols with logarithmic communication complexity. We show that for the security definitions with environment, i.e., Reactive Simulatability and Universal Composability, computational security of logarithmic protocols implies statistical security. The same holds for advantage-based security definitions as commonly used for individual primitives. While this matches the folklore that logarithmic protocols cannot be computationally secure unless they are already statistically secure, we show that under realistic complexity assumptions, this folklore does surprisingly not hold for the stand-alone model without auxiliary input, i.e., there are logarithmic protocols that are statistically insecure but computationally secure in this model. The proof is conducted by showing how to transform an instance of an NP-complete problem into a protocol with two properties: There exists an adversary such that the protocol is statistically insecure in the stand-alone model, and given such an adversary we can find a witness for the problem instance, hence yielding a computationally secure protocol assuming the hardness of finding a witness. The proof relies on a novel technique that establishes a link between cryptographic definitions and foundations of computational
Abstract. We investigate the definition of statistical security (i.e., security against unbounded adversaries) in the framework of reactive simulatability. This framework allows to formulate and analyze multi-party protocols modularly by providing a composition theorem for protocols. However, we show that the notion of statistical security, as defined by Backes, Pfitzmann and Waidner for the reactive simulatability framework, does not allow for secure composition of protocols. This in particular invalidates the proof of the composition theorem. We give evidence that the reason for the non-composability of statistical security is no artifact of the framework itself, but of the particular formulation of statistical security. Therefore, we give a modified notion of statistical security in the reactive simulatability framework. We prove that this notion allows for secure composition of protocols. As to the best of our knowledge, no formal definition of statistical security has been fixed for Canetti’s universal composability framework, we believe that our observations and results can also help to avoid potential pitfalls there.
We investigate the question of whether security of protocols in the information-theoretic setting (where the adversary is computationally unbounded) implies the security of these protocols under concurrent composition. This question is motivated by the folklore that all known protocols that are secure in the information-theoretic setting are indeed secure under concurrent composition. We provide answers to this question for a number of different settings (i.e., considering perfect versus statistical security, and concurrent composition with adaptive versus fixed inputs). Our results enhance the understanding of what is necessary for obtaining security under composition, as well as providing tools (i.e., composition theorems) that can be used for proving the security of protocols under composition while considering only the standard stand-alone definitions of security.
Abstract. In the setting of secure multiparty computation, a set of parties wish to jointly compute some function of their inputs. Such a computation must preserve certain security properties, like privacy and correctness, even if some of the participating parties or an external adversary collude to attack the honest parties. Until this paper, all protocols for general secure computation assumed that the parties can communicate reliably via authenticated channels. In this paper, we consider the feasibility of secure computation without any setup assumption. We consider a completely unauthenticated setting, where all messages sent by the parties may be tampered with and modified by the adversary (without the honest parties being able to detect this fact). In this model, it is not possible to achieve the same level of security as in the authenticated-channel setting. Nevertheless, we show that meaningful security guarantees can be provided. In particular, we define a relaxed notion of what it means to “securely compute ” a function in the unauthenticated setting. Then, we construct protocols for securely realizing any functionality in the stand-alone model, with no setup assumptions whatsoever. In addition, we construct universally composable protocols for securely realizing any functionality in the common reference string model (while still in an unauthenticated network). We also show that our protocols can be used to provide conceptually simple and unified solutions to a number of problems that were studied separately in the past, including password-based authenticated key exchange and non-malleable commitments. 1
We investigate the question of whether the security of protocols in the information-theoretic setting (where the adversary is computationally unbounded) implies the security of these protocols under concurrent composition. This question is motivated by the folklore that all known protocols that are secure in the information-theoretic setting are indeed secure under concurrent composition. We provide answers to this question for a number of different settings (i.e., considering perfect versus statistical security, and concurrent composition with adaptive versus fixed inputs). Our results enhance the understanding of what is necessary for obtaining security under composition, as well as providing tools (i.e., composition theorems) that can be used for proving the security of protocols under composition while considering only the standard stand-alone definitions of security.
The study of secure multiparty computation has yielded powerful feasibility results showing that any efficient functionality can be securely computed in the presence of malicious adversaries. Despite this, there are few problems of specific interest for which we have highly efficient protocols that are secure in the presence of malicious adversaries under full simulation based definitions (following the ideal/real model paradigm). Due to the difficulties of constructing such protocols, many researchers have resorted to weaker definitions of security and weaker adversary models. In this paper, we construct highly efficient protocols for the well-studied problem of oblivious polynomial evaluation. Our protocol is secure under standard cryptographic assumptions for the settings of malicious adversaries, and readily transform to protocols that are secure under universal composability and in the presence of covert adversaries. Our protocol is constant round and requires O(d · s) exponentiations, where d is the degree of the polynomial and s is a statistical security parameter (that should equal about 160 in practice).