Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Characterizations of Quantum Automata

Qiu Dao

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The relationships among various quantum automata are clarified, and in particular, variously equivalent characterizations of quantum automata are established. The G-quantum automata, g-quantum automata, (generalized) quantum automata, G-quantum grammars and g-quantum grammars are presented, and their connections to some of the other existing quantum automata are expounded. Under a certain condition, the equivalence between the G(g)-quantum automata and G(g)-quantum grammars is discussed. Therefore the problem of quantum grammars generating quantum regular languages is solved. The relation between quantum and regular languages is dealt with, and particularly, two open problems proposed by Gudder are answered. Finally, the method of decreasing the dimensions of spaces of states on quantum automata is given.

Related papers

Regular quantum grammars and regular grammars

Wei Cheng, Jue Wang

To study quantum computation, Moore and Crutchfield (Theoret. Comput. Sci. vol. 237, pp. 275-306, 2000) proposed quantum versions of finite-state and push-down automata, as well as regular and context-free grammars. In this note, we show that the languages generated by regular quantum grammars are equivalent to the languages generated by regular grammars. Therefore, from the perspective of generating languages, regular quantum grammars are not more powerful than classical regular grammars. This implies that it may be necessary to look for more well-formed definitions of quantum grammars and maybe those of quantum automata.

International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems•Jan 1, 2004•1 citation

Quantum Automata and Quantum Grammars

Cristopher Moore, James P. Crutchfield

To study quantum computation, it might be helpful to generalize structures from language and automata theory to the quantum case. To that end, we propose quantum versions of finite-state and push-down automata, and regular and context-free grammars. We find analogs of several classical theorems, including pumping lemmas, closure properties, rational and algebraic generating functions, and Greibach normal form. We also show that there are quantum context-free languages that are not context-free.

arXiv:quant-ph/9707031•Jul 16, 1997•4 citations

Quantum automata and quantum computing

Marats Golovkins

Quantum finite automata were introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Crutchfield in [MC 97] and by A.Kondacs and J.Watrous in [KW 97]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata, but rather a generalization of deterministic reversible (permutation) automata. In [AF 98] A.Ambainis and R.Freivalds raised the question what kind of probabilistic automata can be viewed as a special case of quantum finite automata. To answer that question and study relationship between quantum finite automata and probabilistic finite automata, we introduce a notion of probabilistic reversible automata (PRA, or doubly stochastic automata). We give the necessary condition for a language to be recognized by PRA. We find that there is a strong relationship between different possible models of PRA and corresponding models of quantum finite automata. In these thesis we regard quantum automata, probabilistic reversible and deterministic reversible automata as reversible automata. At least two non-equivalent definitions of language recognition are used for one-way reversible finite automata in various papers. Both of these definitions have their own advantages and disadvantages, summarized in our classification of one-way reversible automata. Further, we introduce a notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite multitape automaton but not by deterministic finite multitape automata. Additionally we discover unexpected probabilistic automata recognizing complicated languages. Finally, we revise the concept of quantum pushdown automata (QPA), first introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Cruthchfield in [MC 97]. We give the definition of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of [KW 97]. It is established that the unitary criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitary criteria of quantum Turing machines [BV 97]. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. We also present some simple non-context-free languages recognized by QPA (hence not recognizable by deterministic and nondeterministic pushdown automata).

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

On the class of languages recognizable by 1-way quantum finite automata

Andris Ambainis, Arnolds Ķikusts, Māris Valdats

It is an open problem to characterize the class of languages recognized by quantum finite automata (QFA). We examine some necessary and some sufficient conditions for a (regular) language to be recognizable by a QFA. For a subclass of regular languages we get a condition which is necessary and sufficient. Also, we prove that the class of languages recognizable by a QFA is not closed under union or any other binary Boolean operation where both arguments are significant.

arXiv:quant-ph/0009004•Sep 1, 2000•6 citations

Algebraic and Logical Characterizations of Quantum Bchi Automata

Han Zhao-wei

The notion of quantum Bchi automaton(LVBA for short)is introduced,by means of quantum state construction, the equivalence of an LVBA and an LVSBA with crisp transition function is proved,based on this,the algebraic and level characterizations and also the Bchi characterization of quantum infinite regular languages are investigated,and also the closed properties of those quantum infinite regular languages under some regular operations are dealt with.By providing the concept of monadic secondorder quantum logic(LVMSO in short),the monadic second-order logic characterizations of infinite regular languages recognized by quantum Biichi automata are presented,which deepen and generalize the fundamental Bchi theorem to quantum setting.

Dianzi xuebao•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

On Attributed G-(g-) Quantum Grammars and Attributed Quantum Automata

Peng Jia

To increase depictive ability of quantum grammars and overcome difficulties in context sensitive grammars, we put forward the concepts of attributed G (g ) quantum grammars and attributed quantum automata in this paper. The relationship between them is investigated. It is proved that for a given attributed G (g ) quantum grammar G, an attributed quantum automaton Q can be produced such that f Q=f G,X , and vice versa. So attributed G (g ) quantum language can be recognized automatically.

Journal of Sichuan Normal University•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations
The relationships among various quantum automata are clarified, and in particular, variously equivalent characterizations of quantum automata are established. The G-quantum automata, g-quantum automata, (generalized) quantum automata, G-quantum grammars and g-quantum grammars are presented, and their connections to some of the other existing quantum automata are expounded. Under a certain condition, the equivalence between the G(g)-quantum automata and G(g)-quantum grammars is discussed. Therefore the problem of quantum grammars generating quantum regular languages is solved. The relation between quantum and regular languages is dealt with, and particularly, two open problems proposed by Gudder are answered. Finally, the method of decreasing the dimensions of spaces of states on quantum automata is given.
To study quantum computation, Moore and Crutchfield (Theoret. Comput. Sci. vol. 237, pp. 275-306, 2000) proposed quantum versions of finite-state and push-down automata, as well as regular and context-free grammars. In this note, we show that the languages generated by regular quantum grammars are equivalent to the languages generated by regular grammars. Therefore, from the perspective of generating languages, regular quantum grammars are not more powerful than classical regular grammars. This implies that it may be necessary to look for more well-formed definitions of quantum grammars and maybe those of quantum automata.
Quantum finite automata were introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Crutchfield in [MC 97] and by A.Kondacs and J.Watrous in [KW 97]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata, but rather a generalization of deterministic reversible (permutation) automata. In [AF 98] A.Ambainis and R.Freivalds raised the question what kind of probabilistic automata can be viewed as a special case of quantum finite automata. To answer that question and study relationship between quantum finite automata and probabilistic finite automata, we introduce a notion of probabilistic reversible automata (PRA, or doubly stochastic automata). We give the necessary condition for a language to be recognized by PRA. We find that there is a strong relationship between different possible models of PRA and corresponding models of quantum finite automata. In these thesis we regard quantum automata, probabilistic reversible and deterministic reversible automata as reversible automata. At least two non-equivalent definitions of language recognition are used for one-way reversible finite automata in various papers. Both of these definitions have their own advantages and disadvantages, summarized in our classification of one-way reversible automata. Further, we introduce a notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite multitape automaton but not by deterministic finite multitape automata. Additionally we discover unexpected probabilistic automata recognizing complicated languages. Finally, we revise the concept of quantum pushdown automata (QPA), first introduced by C.Moore and J.P.Cruthchfield in [MC 97]. We give the definition of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by using the definition of quantum finite automata of [KW 97]. It is established that the unitary criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the corresponding unitary criteria of quantum Turing machines [BV 97]. We show that QPA can recognize every regular language. We also present some simple non-context-free languages recognized by QPA (hence not recognizable by deterministic and nondeterministic pushdown automata).
The notion of quantum Bchi automaton(LVBA for short)is introduced,by means of quantum state construction, the equivalence of an LVBA and an LVSBA with crisp transition function is proved,based on this,the algebraic and level characterizations and also the Bchi characterization of quantum infinite regular languages are investigated,and also the closed properties of those quantum infinite regular languages under some regular operations are dealt with.By providing the concept of monadic secondorder quantum logic(LVMSO in short),the monadic second-order logic characterizations of infinite regular languages recognized by quantum Biichi automata are presented,which deepen and generalize the fundamental Bchi theorem to quantum setting.