I believe that physicists gain much of their physics intuition from solving simple model problems explicitly. Apart from the hydrogen atom, this is something that is not often done in relativistic quantum theory books (except the book by Greiner (1990)). In this chapter we set up and solve five simple models that have exact analytical solutions. Furthermore, they are all related to well-known non-relativistic counterparts, and most find application in many areas of physics, particularly solid state physics. These relationships will be pointed out and where appropriate we will also mention the applications and consequences of the models. There are very few models in quantum mechanics that yield exact solutions, hence any that do are of fundamental interest, the hydrogen atom being, perhaps, the most famous example. The hydrogen atom with the potential V(r) = — Ze 2 /4πε 0 r is unique in that it can be solved analytically classically and in both non-relativistic and relativistic quantum theory, with and without spin. This has been discussed in detail in chapters 3 and 8. The five examples we choose to consider here are the following. Firstly we will solve the Dirac equation for an electron in a one-dimensional well, a relativistic generalization of the non-relativistic particle in a box problem.
I believe that physicists gain much of their physics intuition from solving simple model problems explicitly. Apart from the hydrogen atom, this is something that is not often done in relativistic quantum theory books (except the book by Greiner (1990)). In this chapter we set up and solve five simple models that have exact analytical solutions. Furthermore, they are all related to well-known non-relativistic counterparts, and most find application in many areas of physics, particularly solid state physics. These relationships will be pointed out and where appropriate we will also mention the applications and consequences of the models. There are very few models in quantum mechanics that yield exact solutions, hence any that do are of fundamental interest, the hydrogen atom being, perhaps, the most famous example. The hydrogen atom with the potential V(r) = — Ze 2 /4πε 0 r is unique in that it can be solved analytically classically and in both non-relativistic and relativistic quantum theory, with and without spin. This has been discussed in detail in chapters 3 and 8. The five examples we choose to consider here are the following. Firstly we will solve the Dirac equation for an electron in a one-dimensional well, a relativistic generalization of the non-relativistic particle in a box problem.
In this chapter we are going to make a very detailed study of the one-electron atom using relativistic quantum mechanics. The one-electron atom is the simplest bound system that occurs in nature, and plays a central role in both classical and quantum theory. There are two reasons for this. Firstly, it is a model that can be solved exactly at many levels of theory — the classical Bohr atom, the non-relativistic quantum mechanical one-electron atom, and the relativistic one-electron atom with spin zero and spin 1/2. Secondly, most of our understanding of multielectron atoms, molecules and solids is based on this model. Of course, a good description of the hydrogen atom is provided by non-relativistic Schrödinger theory. However, once the relativistic quantum theory had been discovered it was of great importance to validate the theory by describing hydrogen at least as well as Schrödinger theory. As we shall see, the Dirac theory was exceedingly successful in this, and furthermore, at several points in the theory the non-relativistic limit can be taken and the effect of relativity in one-electron atoms can be seen explicitly. This connection with the simpler theory will be made here wherever insight may be gained from doing so. One of the key advances brought about by the advent of quantum theory was that it defined eigenfunctions as well as the eigenvalues predicted by the Bohr theory.
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend
In the previous chapters, we have solved a series of problems that all have an exact solution. However, there are only a select few problems in quantum mechanics that provide exact analytical solutions. Those problems that can be solved exactly are the free particle, the one-dimensional barrier potential, the finite and the infinite square wells, the infinite triangular well, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom, including both its nonrelativistic and relativistic solutions. However, there are many problems different from the above-mentioned few as well as problems that cannot be approximated by these solutions. What happens then if we want to solve a different problem, such as the helium atom or the hydrogen atom in an applied electric field? To solve these problems it is necessary to use approximation techniques. In this chapter, we consider some of these techniques, the most important being the time-independent and the time-dependent perturbation theories. We begin with a discussion of time-independent disturbances in a nondegenerate system. Time-independent Perturbation Theory: The Nondegenerate Case We seek to determine the solution to a problem in which a small disturbance is applied to an otherwise determinable system. Perturbation theory is used most often in cases for which the solution to the undisturbed (unperturbed) system is known and the perturbation is small. For example, perturbation theory is useful in solving for the energy levels in a hydrogen atom in the presence of a small external electric field.
As in non-relativistic quantum theory, the simplest problem to solve in relativistic quantum theory is that of describing a free particle. Much can be learned from this case which will be of use in interpreting the topics covered in later chapters. Furthermore, some of the most profound features of relativistic quantum theory are well illustrated by the free particle, so it is a very instructive problem to consider in detail. Another advantage of the free-particle problem is that the mathematics involved in solving it is not nearly as involved as that necessary for solving problems involving particles under the influence of potentials. Firstly we shall look briefly at the formulae for the current and probability density, then we shall go on to examine the solutions of the Dirac equation and investigate their behaviour. This leads us to a discussion of spin, the Pauli limit, and the relativistic spin operator. Next we consider the negative energy solutions and show how relativistic quantum theory predicts the existence of antiparticles. Some of the dilemmas this concept introduces and their resolution are discussed. At the end of the chapter we go back to the Klein paradox, and examine it for an incident spin-1/2 particle. We find that the Klein paradox exists for Dirac particles in exactly the same way as it existed for Klein—Gordon particles and has the same resolution and interpretation.
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend
The aim of relativistic quantum mechanics is to describe the finer details of the structure of atoms and molecules, where relativistic effects become nonnegligible. It is a sort of intermediate realm, between the familiar nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and fully relativistic quantum field theory, and thus it lacks the simplicity and elegance of both. Yet it is a necessary tool, mostly for quantum chemists. Pilkuhn's book offers to this audience an up-to-date survey of these methods, which is quite welcome since most previous textbooks are at least ten years old. The point of view of the author is to start immediately in the relativistic domain, following the lead of Maxwell's equations rather than classical mechanics, and thus to treat the nonrelativistic version as an approximation. Thus Chapter 1 takes off from Maxwell's equations (in the noncovariant Coulomb gauge) and gradually derives the basic aspects of Quantum Mechanics in a rather pedestrian way (states and observables, Hilbert space, operators, quantum measurement, scattering,. Chapter 2 starts with the Lorentz transformations, then continues with the Pauli spin equation and the Dirac equation and some of their applications (notably the hydrogen atom). Chapter 3 is entitled `Quantum fields and particles', but falls short of treating quantum field theory properly: only creation/annihilation operators are considered, for a particle in a box. The emphasis is on two-electron states (the Pauli principle, the Foldy--Wouthuysen elimination of small components of Dirac spinors, Breit projection operators. Chapter 4 is devoted to scattering theory and the description of relativistic bound states. Chapter 5, finally, covers hyperfine interactions and radiative corrections. As we said above, relativistic quantum mechanics is by nature limited in scope and rather inelegant and Pilkuhn's book is no exception. The notation is often heavy (mostly noncovariant) and the mathematical level rather low. The central topic is the description of atoms and molecules, including relativistic effects. The author fulfils this program in a reasonable way and offers a valuable tool to the targeted audience. I am not overly enthusiastic about the end result, but I might be prejudiced. Clearly, going further would require the full power of quantum field theory, but this is clearly beyond the scope of the book.