Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optoelectronic Technology & Information

Non-adiabatic Geometric QC Implemented with Orthogonal State Method

Lian Hu

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This article obtained the exact wave function and accurate solution of Bloch equation for spin-1/2 particle under the rotating magnetic field. Berry's geometric phase was obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the exact evolutional wave function and was compared with the slow helical neutron experiment done by Bitter and Dubbers. The analytic results of AA geometric phase and the total phase have been obtained for a general cyclic evolution in a conic magnetic field. This article also presented a general description for orthogonal state method. By taking the initial state as the two superposed orthogonal states with equal weight, we proved that the off-diagonals of geometric and dynamic phases cancel exactly at any time. The diagonal parts of dynamic phase also cancel automatically. For the uniform rotating magnetic field, the diagonal geometric phase will evolve as a linear function like the Berry's case. We also discussed the relationship between our studies and the experiment recently done by Du et al.

Related papers

GEOMETRIC PHASES FOR HELICAL NEUTRON AND OPTICAL FIBER

Hu Lian

The exact wave function and rigorous solution of Bloch equation for spin-1/2 under the rotating magnetic field are obtained in this paper. Berry's geometric phase can be obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the exact wave function, and be compared with the slow helical neutron experiment done by Bitter et al. For general cyclic solution, the analytic expressions of AA geometric phase and dynamic phase are obtained, and a perfect explanation to a controversial helical optics fiber experiment done by Chiao et al is given. Another theorem in this paper shows that both Berry's dynamic phase and Berry's geometric phase can be obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the AA dynamic phase. An orthogonal state method is proposed to reach parallel transport, which is practical for the non-adiabatic geometric quantum computation.

Journal of South China Normal University•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Non-adiabatic Non-cyclic Generalization of the Berry Phase for a Spin-1/2 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Siamak Sadat Gousheh, Azadeh Mohammadi, Leila Shahkarami

In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo $2π$, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1212.2104•Dec 10, 2012•1 citation

Geometric and Dynamic Phases for a Spin-1 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Xuehua Yi

The geometric and dynamic phase for spin-1 particle in a rotating magnetic field are studied.We derive formulae of how to calculate the geometric and dynamic phases for spin-1 particle in adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolutions,and calculate the phases by using these formulae.Finally,we discuss three kinds.Berry phase of When considering ω1ω,the system is in adiabatic approximation,at this time geometric phase is Berry phase.

Acta Sinica Quantum Optica•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Measurement of time-dependent quantum phases

A. O. Barut, Mirjana Božić, Serge Klarsfeld +1 more

We evaluate the exact (Pancharatnam) phase differences between the final state \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\psi}(t)〉 and various initial states for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field B(t). For initial states \ensuremath{\Vert}n;${\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}$(0)〉, which are eigenstates of the spin component along the direction of the initial effective field ${\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}$(0), the exact phase has an energy-dependent part and an energy-independent part. It is shown that these states \ensuremath{\Vert}n;${\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}$(0)〉 are cyclic and their corresponding Aharonov-Anandan phases are evaluated. In the adiabatic limit we discuss different choices of time-dependent bases and the relationship between the exact phase, the Born-Fock-Schiff phase, and Berry's phase. We propose neutron interference experiments to test separately the exact and the adiabatic evolution laws, as well as to measure exact and adiabatic time-dependent phases.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1993•12 citations

1 A New Class of Adiabatic Cyclic States and Geometric Phases for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

For a T-periodic non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H(t), we construct a class of adiabatic cyclic states of period T which are not eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian H(0). We show that the corresponding adiabatic geometric phase angles are real and discuss their relationship with the conventional complex adiabatic geometric phase angles. We present a detailed calculation of the new adiabatic cyclic states and their geometric phases for a non-Hermitian analog of the spin 1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field. Since the publication of Berry’s paper [1] on the adiabatic geometrical phase, the subject has undergone a rapid development. Berry’s adiabatic geometric phase for periodic Hermitian Hamiltonians with a discrete nondegenerate spectrum has been generalized to arbitrary changes of a quantum state. In particular, the conditions on the adiabaticity [2] and cyclicity [3, 4, 5] of the evolution, Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian [6], and degeneracy [7] and discreteness [8] of its spectrum have been lifted. Moreover, the classical [9] and relativistic [10] analogues of the geometric phase have been considered. The purpose of this note is to offer an alternative generalization of Berry’s treatment of the adiabatic geometric phase for a non-Hermitian parametric Hamiltonian H[R] with a nondegenerate discrete spectrum. The parameters R = (R1, · · ·, Rn) are assumed to be real ∗E-mail address:

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Berry Phase in an Entangled Spin Cluster with Five Particles

Xiao-Bo Yan

The geometric phase, in particular the Berry phase, in an entangled state of five spin-1/2 particles is studied. A time-dependent magnetic field is applied to control the time evolution of the cluster. Using the method of algebraic dynamics, we calculate the non-adiabatic geometric phase or Berry phase and the degeneracy energy levels when the magnetic rotates around Z axis. Based on the exact analytical solutions, we show how the Berry phase of the entangled state of this cluster depends on the external magnetic field parameters ω (the angular velocity of the rotating magnetic field) and θ (the angle between the magnetic field and Z axis).

Chinese Physics Letters•Jul 26, 2007•1 citation
This article obtained the exact wave function and accurate solution of Bloch equation for spin-1/2 particle under the rotating magnetic field. Berry's geometric phase was obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the exact evolutional wave function and was compared with the slow helical neutron experiment done by Bitter and Dubbers. The analytic results of AA geometric phase and the total phase have been obtained for a general cyclic evolution in a conic magnetic field. This article also presented a general description for orthogonal state method. By taking the initial state as the two superposed orthogonal states with equal weight, we proved that the off-diagonals of geometric and dynamic phases cancel exactly at any time. The diagonal parts of dynamic phase also cancel automatically. For the uniform rotating magnetic field, the diagonal geometric phase will evolve as a linear function like the Berry's case. We also discussed the relationship between our studies and the experiment recently done by Du et al.
The exact wave function and rigorous solution of Bloch equation for spin-1/2 under the rotating magnetic field are obtained in this paper. Berry's geometric phase can be obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the exact wave function, and be compared with the slow helical neutron experiment done by Bitter et al. For general cyclic solution, the analytic expressions of AA geometric phase and dynamic phase are obtained, and a perfect explanation to a controversial helical optics fiber experiment done by Chiao et al is given. Another theorem in this paper shows that both Berry's dynamic phase and Berry's geometric phase can be obtained by taking the adiabatic limit on the AA dynamic phase. An orthogonal state method is proposed to reach parallel transport, which is practical for the non-adiabatic geometric quantum computation.
In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo 2π2π2π, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.
We evaluate the exact (Pancharatnam) phase differences between the final state \ensuremath{\Vert}\ensuremath{\psi}(t)〉 and various initial states for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field B(t). For initial states \ensuremath{\Vert}n;Bef{\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}Bef​(0)〉, which are eigenstates of the spin component along the direction of the initial effective field Bef{\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}Bef​(0), the exact phase has an energy-dependent part and an energy-independent part. It is shown that these states \ensuremath{\Vert}n;Bef{\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{ef}}Bef​(0)〉 are cyclic and their corresponding Aharonov-Anandan phases are evaluated. In the adiabatic limit we discuss different choices of time-dependent bases and the relationship between the exact phase, the Born-Fock-Schiff phase, and Berry's phase. We propose neutron interference experiments to test separately the exact and the adiabatic evolution laws, as well as to measure exact and adiabatic time-dependent phases.
For a T-periodic non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H(t), we construct a class of adiabatic cyclic states of period T which are not eigenstates of the initial Hamiltonian H(0). We show that the corresponding adiabatic geometric phase angles are real and discuss their relationship with the conventional complex adiabatic geometric phase angles. We present a detailed calculation of the new adiabatic cyclic states and their geometric phases for a non-Hermitian analog of the spin 1/2 particle in a precessing magnetic field. Since the publication of Berry’s paper [1] on the adiabatic geometrical phase, the subject has undergone a rapid development. Berry’s adiabatic geometric phase for periodic Hermitian Hamiltonians with a discrete nondegenerate spectrum has been generalized to arbitrary changes of a quantum state. In particular, the conditions on the adiabaticity [2] and cyclicity [3, 4, 5] of the evolution, Hermiticity of the Hamiltonian [6], and degeneracy [7] and discreteness [8] of its spectrum have been lifted. Moreover, the classical [9] and relativistic [10] analogues of the geometric phase have been considered. The purpose of this note is to offer an alternative generalization of Berry’s treatment of the adiabatic geometric phase for a non-Hermitian parametric Hamiltonian H[R] with a nondegenerate discrete spectrum. The parameters R = (R1, · · ·, Rn) are assumed to be real ∗E-mail address:
The geometric phase, in particular the Berry phase, in an entangled state of five spin-1/2 particles is studied. A time-dependent magnetic field is applied to control the time evolution of the cluster. Using the method of algebraic dynamics, we calculate the non-adiabatic geometric phase or Berry phase and the degeneracy energy levels when the magnetic rotates around Z axis. Based on the exact analytical solutions, we show how the Berry phase of the entangled state of this cluster depends on the external magnetic field parameters ω (the angular velocity of the rotating magnetic field) and θ (the angle between the magnetic field and Z axis).