Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Institute of Physics eBooks

Dirac ?-function

Published Nov 26, 2004• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Based on the definition of Dirac-delta function δ(x),no definition at x=0 for δ(x)is explained.The δ(x) possesses a dimension of the reciprocal of x and the physical significance of x operator's eigenfunction.Some ambiguities in quantum mechanics textbooks are clarified.
DOI
10.1887/0750309822/b1130v1b5

Related papers

Physical interpretations of the differentiation rule for the Dirac delta function

Denys I. Bondar, Robert R. Lompay, Wing‐Ki Liu

The canonical commutation relation between the quantum mechanical operators of momentum and coordinate and the Ehrenfest theorem in the free particle case are derived solely from the rule of differentiation of the delta function [$x\delta'(x) = - \delta(x)$].

•Jul 24, 2010•0 citations

Completeness of the energy eigenstates for a delta function potential

William C. Damert

By explicit calculation it is shown that the eigenfunctions of a particular Hamiltonian are complete. The Hamiltonian considered is that for a particle moving in one dimension with a Dirac delta function potential.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1975•14 citations

Quantum mechanics of a free particle from properties of the Dirac delta function

Denys I. Bondar, Robert R. Lompay, Wing-Ki Liu

Based on the assumption that the probability density of finding a free particle is independent of position, we infer the form of the eigenfunction for the free particle, ⟨x|p⟩=exp(ipx/ℏ)/2πℏ. The canonical commutation relation between the momentum and position operators and the Ehrenfest theorem in the free particle case are derived solely from differentiation of the delta function and the form of ⟨x|p⟩.

arXiv:1007.4243•American Journal of Physics•Mar 14, 2011•6 citations

Unusual situations that arise with the Dirac delta function and its derivative

Francisco Antônio Bezerra Coutinho, Yukihisa Nogami, F. Masafumi Toyama

There is a situation such that, when a function ƒ( ) is combined with the Dirac delta function δ( ), the usual formula does not hold. A similar situation may also be encountered with the derivative of the delta function δ'( ), regarding the validity of . We present an overview of such unusual situations and elucidate their underlying mechanisms. We discuss implications of the situations regarding the transmission-reflection problem of one-dimensional quantum mechanics.

Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Dec 1, 2009•22 citations

Modified Dirac delta function and modified dirac delta potential in the quantum mechanics

Won Sang Chung, HASSAN HASSANABADI

The European Physical Journal Plus•Jan 1, 2022•2 citations

Energy transfer and position measurement in quantum mechanics

J.C. Ye, S.Q. Kuang, Z. Li +2 more

The Dirac delta function can be defined by the limitation of the rectangular function covering a unit area with decrease of the width of the rectangle to zero, and in quantum mechanics the eigenvectors of the position operator assume the form of the delta function. When discussing the position measurement in quantum mechanics, one is tempting to take the mathematical convention that uses the rectangular wave function of sufficiently narrow width to approximate the delta function in order to making the state of the position physical. We argue that such an approximation is improper in physics, because during the position measurement the energy transfer to the particle might be infinitely large. The continuous and square-integrable functions of both sharp peak and sufficiently narrow width can then be better approximations of the delta function to represent the physical states of the position. When the slit experiment is taken as an apparatus of position measurement, no matter what potential is used to model the slit, only the ground state of the slit-dependent wave function matters.

arXiv:1808.05165•Results in Physics•Feb 23, 2019•11 citations
The canonical commutation relation between the quantum mechanical operators of momentum and coordinate and the Ehrenfest theorem in the free particle case are derived solely from the rule of differentiation of the delta function [xδ′(x)=−δ(x)x\delta'(x) = - \delta(x)xδ′(x)=−δ(x)].
The Dirac delta function can be defined by the limitation of the rectangular function covering a unit area with decrease of the width of the rectangle to zero, and in quantum mechanics the eigenvectors of the position operator assume the form of the delta function. When discussing the position measurement in quantum mechanics, one is tempting to take the mathematical convention that uses the rectangular wave function of sufficiently narrow width to approximate the delta function in order to making the state of the position physical. We argue that such an approximation is improper in physics, because during the position measurement the energy transfer to the particle might be infinitely large. The continuous and square-integrable functions of both sharp peak and sufficiently narrow width can then be better approximations of the delta function to represent the physical states of the position. When the slit experiment is taken as an apparatus of position measurement, no matter what potential is used to model the slit, only the ground state of the slit-dependent wave function matters.