Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Ludong University Journal

The Generalized Expression of Uncertainty Relations

Liu Sheng-dianb

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Based on the basic properties of mechanical quantity operator and the inner product three axioms,the generalized expression of uncertainty relations and the strict mathematics proof are given,and then their characteristic which frequently neglects,improper explanations of some literature discussed carefully.

Related papers

Introduce of Generalized Uncertainty Principle

Seyed Davood Sadatian

We study and explain the uncertainty principle. We've discussed how to reform the uncertainty principle. In this regards, we have used the mechanisms of noncommutative algebra for obtain a generalized uncertainty principle. Following, Due to modified relationship uncertainty, we consider some application of these relation

International Letters of Chemistry Physics and Astronomy•Oct 1, 2014•2 citations

The Derivation and Some Explanations of the Uncertainty Principle

Haoran Huang

This paper is a small discussion about the uncertainty principle. With the great discoveries and researches made by predecessors, I try to answer some questions within the uncertainty principle. Using the definition of momentum, the momentum in de Broglie wave, the property of cosine function, the Euler’s formula, the basic property of plane wave, the law of derivative, the energy of quantum discovered by Max Planck, the photon energy discovered by Albert Einstein, the energy equation of a system and the Hamiltonian operator, I figure out the Schrodinger equation successfully. With the help of Schrodinger equation, the possibility density of a wave function, the concept of normalization, the average value of position and momentum, the Fourier transform, the integration by parts and the limit of normalized wave functions, I find the position operator and the momentum operator. Then using some knowledge of the standard deviation and the variance, the concept of inner product of vectors, some property of Dirac symbol, the law of calculation of complex number and the law of operator calculation, I obtain the general uncertainty relationship of abstract mathematical quantities. According to the general relationship, I get the inequality of uncertainty principle, and discuss the specific relationship between the position and the momentum. After getting the inequality, I use Heisenberg’s experiment of measuring an electron by using the γ ray to hit the electron to explain why we cannot measure the position and the momentum simultaneously. Based on Heisenberg’s experiment, I give my own explanation by discussing the earth and a spacecraft. Transforming the perspective, we can easily see how the accuracies of position and momentum change. In addition, I attempt to figure out why the uncertainty exists. However, I can only explain it by discussing the time and frequency in mathematical method and have no idea to work it out in a pure physics approach.

Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology•Jul 30, 2023•0 citations

On the Weak Value and Uncertainty Relations based on Quasi-Joint-Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

宰河 李

A general prescription for the construction of quasi-joint-probability distributions intended to describe the "joint behaviour" of an arbitrary pair of (generally non-commuting) quantum observables, along with its application to the geometric/statistical interpretation of Aharonov's weak value and a proposal for new uncertainty relations, are presented.The introduction of such distributions is motivated by two complementary approaches: one from a bottom-up and strictly operational construction by carefully examining the mathematical framework of the conditioned measurement scheme, and the other from a top-down viewpoint by applying the results of spectral theorem for normal operators and its Fourier transforms.It is revealed that, for a pair of simultaneously measurable observables, the distribution reduces to the unique standard joint-probability distribution of the pair as expected, whereas for a non-commuting pair, there exists an inherent indefiniteness for the choice of such distributions, admitting a multitude of candidates that qualify to describe the "joint behaviour" of the pair.The L 2 structures induced by the quasi-joint-probability distributions are then found to provide statistical interpretation of the geometric structures that can be naturally introduced on the space of operators on the underlying Hilbert space.As possible applications of our findings, we focus on orthogonal projections and inner products of observables, and observe that such geometric concepts can respectively be given statistical interpretations as "conditionings" and "correlations".Incidentally, weak values A w are given a geometric/statistical interpretation as either the orthogonal projection of an observable A on the subspace generated by another observable B (or equivalently, as the conditioning of A given B with respect to the quasi-joint-probability distribution under consideration).Moreover, the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality applied on inner products of two observables (or equivalently, correlations between the pair) leads to novel inequalities interpreted as uncertainty relations for approximation/estimation, which entails the time-energy uncertainty relation as its special case.

•Mar 24, 2016•0 citations

The general discussion of uncertain relation in quantum mechanics

Zhang Yun-sheng

The paper gives some concrete discussions of uncertainly relation and relevant examples that concern.

Journal of Dezhou University•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Two new kinds of uncertainty relations

Jos Uffink

We review a statistical-geometrical and a generalized entropic approach to the uncertainty principle. Both approaches provide a strengthening and generalization of the standard Heisenberg uncertainty relations, but in different directions.

•May 1, 1994•3 citations

Exploring the implications of the uncertainty relationships in quantum mechanics

Huai‐Yu Wang

Heisenberg guessed, after he established the matrix quantum mechanics, that the non-commutativity of the matrices of position and momentum implied that the position and momentum of a particle could not be precisely simultaneously determined. He consequently conjectured that time and energy should also have a similar relationship. Soon after, Robertson derived an inequality concerning the space coordinate and momentum, which was thought to be the mathematical expression of the uncertainty relation guessed by Heisenberg. Since then, people have tried various devices to prove the correctness of these two relations. However, no one conducted a careful analysis of Heisenberg’s primary paper. In this work, we point out some serious problems in Heisenberg’s paper and the literature talking about the uncertainty relationships: the physical concepts involved in the uncertainty relations are not clear; one physical concept had more than one explanation, i.e., switching concepts; there has never been measurement experiment to support the relations. The conclusions are that the so-called coordinate–momentum uncertainty relation has never been related to actual measurement and there does not exist a time–energy uncertainty relation.

Frontiers in Physics•Dec 8, 2022•3 citations
This paper is a small discussion about the uncertainty principle. With the great discoveries and researches made by predecessors, I try to answer some questions within the uncertainty principle. Using the definition of momentum, the momentum in de Broglie wave, the property of cosine function, the Euler’s formula, the basic property of plane wave, the law of derivative, the energy of quantum discovered by Max Planck, the photon energy discovered by Albert Einstein, the energy equation of a system and the Hamiltonian operator, I figure out the Schrodinger equation successfully. With the help of Schrodinger equation, the possibility density of a wave function, the concept of normalization, the average value of position and momentum, the Fourier transform, the integration by parts and the limit of normalized wave functions, I find the position operator and the momentum operator. Then using some knowledge of the standard deviation and the variance, the concept of inner product of vectors, some property of Dirac symbol, the law of calculation of complex number and the law of operator calculation, I obtain the general uncertainty relationship of abstract mathematical quantities. According to the general relationship, I get the inequality of uncertainty principle, and discuss the specific relationship between the position and the momentum. After getting the inequality, I use Heisenberg’s experiment of measuring an electron by using the γ ray to hit the electron to explain why we cannot measure the position and the momentum simultaneously. Based on Heisenberg’s experiment, I give my own explanation by discussing the earth and a spacecraft. Transforming the perspective, we can easily see how the accuracies of position and momentum change. In addition, I attempt to figure out why the uncertainty exists. However, I can only explain it by discussing the time and frequency in mathematical method and have no idea to work it out in a pure physics approach.
A general prescription for the construction of quasi-joint-probability distributions intended to describe the "joint behaviour" of an arbitrary pair of (generally non-commuting) quantum observables, along with its application to the geometric/statistical interpretation of Aharonov's weak value and a proposal for new uncertainty relations, are presented.The introduction of such distributions is motivated by two complementary approaches: one from a bottom-up and strictly operational construction by carefully examining the mathematical framework of the conditioned measurement scheme, and the other from a top-down viewpoint by applying the results of spectral theorem for normal operators and its Fourier transforms.It is revealed that, for a pair of simultaneously measurable observables, the distribution reduces to the unique standard joint-probability distribution of the pair as expected, whereas for a non-commuting pair, there exists an inherent indefiniteness for the choice of such distributions, admitting a multitude of candidates that qualify to describe the "joint behaviour" of the pair.The L 2 structures induced by the quasi-joint-probability distributions are then found to provide statistical interpretation of the geometric structures that can be naturally introduced on the space of operators on the underlying Hilbert space.As possible applications of our findings, we focus on orthogonal projections and inner products of observables, and observe that such geometric concepts can respectively be given statistical interpretations as "conditionings" and "correlations".Incidentally, weak values A w are given a geometric/statistical interpretation as either the orthogonal projection of an observable A on the subspace generated by another observable B (or equivalently, as the conditioning of A given B with respect to the quasi-joint-probability distribution under consideration).Moreover, the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality applied on inner products of two observables (or equivalently, correlations between the pair) leads to novel inequalities interpreted as uncertainty relations for approximation/estimation, which entails the time-energy uncertainty relation as its special case.
Heisenberg guessed, after he established the matrix quantum mechanics, that the non-commutativity of the matrices of position and momentum implied that the position and momentum of a particle could not be precisely simultaneously determined. He consequently conjectured that time and energy should also have a similar relationship. Soon after, Robertson derived an inequality concerning the space coordinate and momentum, which was thought to be the mathematical expression of the uncertainty relation guessed by Heisenberg. Since then, people have tried various devices to prove the correctness of these two relations. However, no one conducted a careful analysis of Heisenberg’s primary paper. In this work, we point out some serious problems in Heisenberg’s paper and the literature talking about the uncertainty relationships: the physical concepts involved in the uncertainty relations are not clear; one physical concept had more than one explanation, i.e., switching concepts; there has never been measurement experiment to support the relations. The conclusions are that the so-called coordinate–momentum uncertainty relation has never been related to actual measurement and there does not exist a time–energy uncertainty relation.