Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Geometry of probabilities confirmed

Rob Tycko

Published Sep 1, 1991• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The geometric transition probability, discovered by Michael Berry of Bristol University, UK, has now been characterised experimentally for the first time by J W Zwanziger, S P Rucker and G C Chingas, using an ingenious technique based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Phys. Rev. A (1991) 43 3232). An introduction to the theory of this new geometric effect in quantum mechanics was given by Ian Aitchison in Physics World last November (p22).

DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/4/9/25

Related papers

Geometry of probabilities uncovered

Ian Altchison

A new geometric effect in quantum mechanics has been found by Micheal Berry of Bristol University, UK (1990 Proc. Ray. Spc. Lond. A 430 405–11). As in the case of Berry's famous 'geometrical phase factor', the effect occurs in quantum systems undergoing non-dissipative adiabatic change; however, the new result is that for certain kinds of time dependence an amplitude factor can have a geometric character.

Physics World•Nov 1, 1990•0 citations

The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems

Saverio Pascazio

The discovery of the geometric phase is one of the most interesting and intriguing findings of the last few decades. It led to a deeper understanding of the concept of phase in quantum mechanics and motivated a surge of interest in fundamental quantum mechanical issues, disclosing unexpected applications in very diverse fields of physics. Although the key ideas underlying the existence of a purely geometrical phase had already been proposed in 1956 by Pancharatnam, it was Michael Berry who revived this issue 30 years later. The clarity of Berry's seminal paper, in 1984, was extraordinary. Research on the topic flourished at such a pace that it became difficult for non-experts to follow the many different theoretical ideas and experimental proposals which ensued. Diverse concepts in independent areas of mathematics, physics and chemistry were being applied, for what was (and can still be considered) a nascent arena for theory, experiments and technology. Although collections of papers by different authors appeared in the literature, sometimes with ample introductions, surprisingly, to the best of my knowledge, no specific and exhaustive book has ever been written on this subject. The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems is the first thorough book on geometric phases and fills an important gap in the physical literature. Other books on the subject will undoubtedly follow. But it will take a fairly long time before other authors can cover that same variety of concepts in such a comprehensive manner. The book is enjoyable. The choice of topics presented is well balanced and appropriate. The appendices are well written, understandable and exhaustive - three rare qualities. I also find it praiseworthy that the authors decided to explicitly carry out most of the calculations, avoiding, as much as possible, the use of the joke `after a straightforward calculation, one finds...' This was one of the sentences I used to dislike most during my undergraduate studies. A student is inexperienced in such matters and needs to look at details. This book is addressed to graduate physics and chemistry students and was written thinking of students. However, I would recommend it also to young and mature physicists, even those who are already `into' the subject. It is a comprehensive work, jointly written by five researchers. After a simple introduction to the subject, the book gradually provides deeper concepts, more advanced theory and finally an interesting introduction and explanation of recent experiments. For its multidisciplinary features, this work could not have been written by one single author. The collaborative effort is undoubtedly one of its most interesting qualities. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more on the geometric phase, a topic that is both beautiful and intruiguing.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Nov 26, 2003•27 citations

Geometric phase in NMR interferometry experiment

Nikolai R. Skrynnikov, B. C. Sanctuary

Experimental detection of geometric phase effects is based on interferometry techniques. The observation of a nonadiabatic geometric phase in nuclear magnetic resonance has been reported by D. Suter, K. T. Mueller, and A. Pines (1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 60, 1218). A rigorous interpretation of their results is presented here. The experiment exploits the concept of fictitious spin-1/2 subsystems embedded in a spin system of higher order. A relevant expression for the geometric phase is derived here using the Euler rotation representation for the SU(2) group. In order to correlate the experimental data to the geometric phase, a decomposition of the density matrix in a basis of pure states is used and the isomorphism between the cyclic evolution of pure states and mixed states is constructed. Rigorous treatment of the dynamic phase, along with technical aspects of the experiment, shows that the observed echo shift is related directly to the geometric phase, in agreement with Suter et al. The observed geometric phase is classified as a frame-related phase.

Molecular Physics•Dec 20, 1994•4 citations

From the A-A Phase to the Berry Geometric Phase

Pengfei Zhao

In this paper, we study the condition of producing the A-A phase in the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) system, and work out the A-A phase. In the case of adiabatic-limit, the Berry geometric phase is obtained from the A-A phase.

Journal of Zhanjiang Normal College•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Quantum Phases: 50 years of the Aharonov--Bohm effect and 25 years of the Berry phase

Mark R. Dennis, Sandu Popescu, Lev Vaidman A

This special issue celebrates the discovery of two of the most important aspects of quantum mechanics: the Aharonov–Bohm effect and the Berry phase. The issue includes work presented at two conferences, 50 Years of the Aharonov–Bohm Effect, 11–14 October 2009, Tel Aviv University, Israel, and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect and Berry Phase 50/25 Anniversary, 14–15 December 2009, Bristol University, UK. The Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect and the Berry phase have many things in common, apart from the happy coincidence that they were discovered 25 years apart, making possible such a joint anniversary. First, they were both discovered in the same place, the H H Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, UK. Second, they both were there for everybody to see from day one, from the very beginning of quantum mechanics. They were, so to say, right on the surface; there was no need for sophisticated mathematics or involved constructions. Yet it took so long for somebody to see them. The explanation, we dare to speculate, is that they are so unusual, they challenge so much our everyday experience and ingrained intuitions about physics that it was difficult to recognise them. Third, both the AB effect and the Berry phase are quintessentially quantum; they both manifest themselves as topological/geometric quantum phases. The AB effect revolutionized our understanding of the role of potentials in physics. For the first time, it was shown that a particle moving in a field-free region could be affected by a field in a disjoint region. In doing so, it shattered one of the strongest held principles of physics. In the case of the Berry phase, the importance lies in its absolute generality—the topological/geometric phase named after Berry is acquired by all physical systems when the external parameters they depend upon undergo an adiabatic cyclic change. Remarkably this phase depends only on the geometry of the cyclic path in the abstract parameter space, a fact which deepens our appreciation of the underlying geometry of quantum mechanics. The AB effect and the Berry phase are ubiquitous in modern physics and have implications ranging from the most fundamental to the very applied. First and foremost, they give a deeper understanding of the nature of quantum mechanics itself. Furthermore, we find them in fields as varied as cosmology, particle physics, non-abelian gauge theories, condensed matter, chemical and molecular physics, and laser dynamics. Generalizations of the AB effect to non-abelian gauge theories, such as the Wilson and `t Hooft loops, are important tools for studying confinement and spontaneous symmetry breaking. They explain charge quantization, the quantum Hall effect and the Josephson junction and also play a crucial role in electron microscope holography. Without them an understanding of many effects in the new field of mesoscopic physics, where tiny electronic circuits exhibit quantum behaviour, would be impossible. Like good wine, the AB effect and the Berry phase become finer and more appreciated with time. Even though they appear in textbooks and encyclopaedias, the number of researchers thinking and publishing papers on these two effects is increasing annually. The AB effect and the Berry phase keep being observed in new systems and with every day that passes novel applications are routinely found. This special issue is just a small snapshot of the state of the art 50 and 25 years, respectively, from their discoveries.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2010•4 citations

Quantum Probability Geometrically Realized in Projective Space

Stephen Bruce Sontz

arXiv:2410.18266•Foundations of Physics•Jul 9, 2025•0 citations
The geometric transition probability, discovered by Michael Berry of Bristol University, UK, has now been characterised experimentally for the first time by J W Zwanziger, S P Rucker and G C Chingas, using an ingenious technique based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Phys. Rev. A (1991) 43 3232). An introduction to the theory of this new geometric effect in quantum mechanics was given by Ian Aitchison in Physics World last November (p22).
The discovery of the geometric phase is one of the most interesting and intriguing findings of the last few decades. It led to a deeper understanding of the concept of phase in quantum mechanics and motivated a surge of interest in fundamental quantum mechanical issues, disclosing unexpected applications in very diverse fields of physics. Although the key ideas underlying the existence of a purely geometrical phase had already been proposed in 1956 by Pancharatnam, it was Michael Berry who revived this issue 30 years later. The clarity of Berry's seminal paper, in 1984, was extraordinary. Research on the topic flourished at such a pace that it became difficult for non-experts to follow the many different theoretical ideas and experimental proposals which ensued. Diverse concepts in independent areas of mathematics, physics and chemistry were being applied, for what was (and can still be considered) a nascent arena for theory, experiments and technology. Although collections of papers by different authors appeared in the literature, sometimes with ample introductions, surprisingly, to the best of my knowledge, no specific and exhaustive book has ever been written on this subject. The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems is the first thorough book on geometric phases and fills an important gap in the physical literature. Other books on the subject will undoubtedly follow. But it will take a fairly long time before other authors can cover that same variety of concepts in such a comprehensive manner. The book is enjoyable. The choice of topics presented is well balanced and appropriate. The appendices are well written, understandable and exhaustive - three rare qualities. I also find it praiseworthy that the authors decided to explicitly carry out most of the calculations, avoiding, as much as possible, the use of the joke `after a straightforward calculation, one finds...' This was one of the sentences I used to dislike most during my undergraduate studies. A student is inexperienced in such matters and needs to look at details. This book is addressed to graduate physics and chemistry students and was written thinking of students. However, I would recommend it also to young and mature physicists, even those who are already `into' the subject. It is a comprehensive work, jointly written by five researchers. After a simple introduction to the subject, the book gradually provides deeper concepts, more advanced theory and finally an interesting introduction and explanation of recent experiments. For its multidisciplinary features, this work could not have been written by one single author. The collaborative effort is undoubtedly one of its most interesting qualities. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more on the geometric phase, a topic that is both beautiful and intruiguing.
Experimental detection of geometric phase effects is based on interferometry techniques. The observation of a nonadiabatic geometric phase in nuclear magnetic resonance has been reported by D. Suter, K. T. Mueller, and A. Pines (1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 60, 1218). A rigorous interpretation of their results is presented here. The experiment exploits the concept of fictitious spin-1/2 subsystems embedded in a spin system of higher order. A relevant expression for the geometric phase is derived here using the Euler rotation representation for the SU(2) group. In order to correlate the experimental data to the geometric phase, a decomposition of the density matrix in a basis of pure states is used and the isomorphism between the cyclic evolution of pure states and mixed states is constructed. Rigorous treatment of the dynamic phase, along with technical aspects of the experiment, shows that the observed echo shift is related directly to the geometric phase, in agreement with Suter et al. The observed geometric phase is classified as a frame-related phase.
This special issue celebrates the discovery of two of the most important aspects of quantum mechanics: the Aharonov–Bohm effect and the Berry phase. The issue includes work presented at two conferences, 50 Years of the Aharonov–Bohm Effect, 11–14 October 2009, Tel Aviv University, Israel, and the Aharonov–Bohm Effect and Berry Phase 50/25 Anniversary, 14–15 December 2009, Bristol University, UK. The Aharonov–Bohm (AB) effect and the Berry phase have many things in common, apart from the happy coincidence that they were discovered 25 years apart, making possible such a joint anniversary. First, they were both discovered in the same place, the H H Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, UK. Second, they both were there for everybody to see from day one, from the very beginning of quantum mechanics. They were, so to say, right on the surface; there was no need for sophisticated mathematics or involved constructions. Yet it took so long for somebody to see them. The explanation, we dare to speculate, is that they are so unusual, they challenge so much our everyday experience and ingrained intuitions about physics that it was difficult to recognise them. Third, both the AB effect and the Berry phase are quintessentially quantum; they both manifest themselves as topological/geometric quantum phases. The AB effect revolutionized our understanding of the role of potentials in physics. For the first time, it was shown that a particle moving in a field-free region could be affected by a field in a disjoint region. In doing so, it shattered one of the strongest held principles of physics. In the case of the Berry phase, the importance lies in its absolute generality—the topological/geometric phase named after Berry is acquired by all physical systems when the external parameters they depend upon undergo an adiabatic cyclic change. Remarkably this phase depends only on the geometry of the cyclic path in the abstract parameter space, a fact which deepens our appreciation of the underlying geometry of quantum mechanics. The AB effect and the Berry phase are ubiquitous in modern physics and have implications ranging from the most fundamental to the very applied. First and foremost, they give a deeper understanding of the nature of quantum mechanics itself. Furthermore, we find them in fields as varied as cosmology, particle physics, non-abelian gauge theories, condensed matter, chemical and molecular physics, and laser dynamics. Generalizations of the AB effect to non-abelian gauge theories, such as the Wilson and `t Hooft loops, are important tools for studying confinement and spontaneous symmetry breaking. They explain charge quantization, the quantum Hall effect and the Josephson junction and also play a crucial role in electron microscope holography. Without them an understanding of many effects in the new field of mesoscopic physics, where tiny electronic circuits exhibit quantum behaviour, would be impossible. Like good wine, the AB effect and the Berry phase become finer and more appreciated with time. Even though they appear in textbooks and encyclopaedias, the number of researchers thinking and publishing papers on these two effects is increasing annually. The AB effect and the Berry phase keep being observed in new systems and with every day that passes novel applications are routinely found. This special issue is just a small snapshot of the state of the art 50 and 25 years, respectively, from their discoveries.