Bell’s inequality is an expression which can be employed in order to test for the existence of hidden variables in a correlated system. The idea of hidden variables was introduced as a potential explanation for the quantum mechanical phenomenon of non-deterministic results of measurements. The existence of hidden variables can be tested experimentally. First, a particular measurement of one component of a correlated system must be associated with a positive or negative integer value. There must be an equal probability density of obtaining either measurement. Following this, an ensemble average of these measurements must be performed and Bell’s inequality must subsequently be employed. This theorem was essential in settling the EPR argument against quantum mechanical indeterminism, experimentally showing through violation of the inequality that there are indeed no hidden variables in a quantum system. For a system exhibiting classical behavior, Bell’s inequality should not be violated, provided the correlated system meets criteria appropriate to the assumptions underlying Bell’s theorem. A Mathematica model of Bell’s inequality was developed utilizing a Monte Carlo approach of randomizing parameters in order to test models of correlated systems. The model appears to agree with classical determinism within one standard deviation. It is possible to test both classical and quantum mechanical systems if properly correlated, and it is of future interest to test whether this extends to chaotic systems.
Bell’s inequality is an expression which can be employed in order to test for the existence of hidden variables in a correlated system. The idea of hidden variables was introduced as a potential explanation for the quantum mechanical phenomenon of non-deterministic results of measurements. The existence of hidden variables can be tested experimentally. First, a particular measurement of one component of a correlated system must be associated with a positive or negative integer value. There must be an equal probability density of obtaining either measurement. Following this, an ensemble average of these measurements must be performed and Bell’s inequality must subsequently be employed. This theorem was essential in settling the EPR argument against quantum mechanical indeterminism, experimentally showing through violation of the inequality that there are indeed no hidden variables in a quantum system. For a system exhibiting classical behavior, Bell’s inequality should not be violated, provided the correlated system meets criteria appropriate to the assumptions underlying Bell’s theorem. A Mathematica model of Bell’s inequality was developed utilizing a Monte Carlo approach of randomizing parameters in order to test models of correlated systems. The model appears to agree with classical determinism within one standard deviation. It is possible to test both classical and quantum mechanical systems if properly correlated, and it is of future interest to test whether this extends to chaotic systems.
The Bell theorem and inequality were derived as consequences of seemingly reasonable physical and statistical hypotheses. Bell’s assumptions were used to deduce cross-correlations of three spin measurements on two entangled particles neglecting non-commutation. The assumed correlation functions, later confirmed for certain quantum measurements, violate the Bell inequality. The present paper reviews a more general derivation of the Bell inequality showing that it is identically satisfied by finite data sets whether deterministic or random, after assuming merely that they exist. It is thereafter concerned with the consequences of this result for interpretations of the inequality that result in its violation. A primary finding is that correlation functions have differing forms due to quantum commutation, non-commutation, and conditions of measurement, and result in satisfaction of the Bell inequality used consistently with its derivation. A stochastic process having the same correlation function for all variable pairs is shown to be inconsistent with experimentally reported data. The logic of the three and four variable inequalities is shown to be similar. Finally the inequalities in probabilities are shown to follow from those in correlations with quantum mechanical results satisfying either when properly implemented.
Abstract One of the Bell’s assumptions in the original derivation of his inequalities was the hypothesis of locality, i.e., the absence of the influence of two remote measuring instruments on one another. That is why violations of these inequalities observed in experiments are often interpreted as a manifestation of the nonlocal nature of quantum mechanics, or a refutation of a local realism. It is well known that the Bell’s inequality was derived in its traditional form, without resorting to the hypothesis of locality and without the introduction of hidden variables, the only assumption being that the probability distributions are nonnegative. This can therefore be regarded as a rigorous proof that the hypothesis of locality and the hypothesis of existence of the hidden variables not relevant to violations of Bell’s inequalities. The physical meaning of the obtained results is examined. Physical nature of the violation of the Bell inequalities is explained under new EPR-B nonlocality postulate. We show that the correlations of the observables involved in the Bohm–Bell type experiments can be expressed as correlations of classical random variables. The revisited Bell type inequality in canonical notatons reads 〈AB〉 + 〈A’B〉 + 〈AB’〉 − 〈A’B’〉 ⩽ 6.
Quantum theory is inconsistent with any local hidden variable model as was first shown by Bell. To test Bell inequalities two separated observers extract correlations from a common ensemble of identical systems. Since quantum theory does not allow simultaneous measurements of noncommuting observables, on each system every party measures a single randomly chosen observable out of a given set. Here we suggest a different approach for testing Bell inequalities that is experimentally realizable by current methods. We show that Bell inequalities can be maximally violated even when all observables are measured on each member of the ensemble. This is possible by using weak measurements that produce small disturbance, at the expense of accuracy. However, our approach does not constitute an independent test of quantum nonlocality since the local hidden variables may correlate the noise of the measurement instruments. Nevertheless, by adding a randomly chosen precise measurement at the end of every cycle of weak measurements, the parties can verify that the hidden variables were not interfering with the noise, and thus validate the suggested test.
It is one of the most remarkable features of quantum physics that measurements on spatially separated systems cannot always be described by a locally causal theory. In such a theory, the outcomes of local measurements are determined in advance solely by some unknown (or hidden) variables and the choice of local measurements. Correlations that are allowed within the framework of a locally causal theory are termed classical. Typically, the fact that quantum mechanics does not always result in classical correlations is revealed by the violation of Bell inequalities, which are constraints that have to be satisfied by any classical correlations. It has been known for a long time that entanglement is necessary to demonstrate nonclassical correlations, and hence a Bell inequality violation. However, since some entangled quantum states are known to admit explicit locally causal models, the exact role of entanglement in Bell inequality violation has remained obscure. This thesis provides both a comprehensive review on these issues as well as a report on new discoveries made to clarify the relationship between entanglement and Bell inequality violation. In particular, within the framework of a standard Bell experiment, i.e., a Bell inequality test that is directly performed on a single copy of a quantum state r, we have derived two algorithms to determine, respectively, a lower bound and an upper bound on the strength of correlations that r can offer for any given Bell inequality. Both of these algorithms make use convex optimization techniques in the form of a semidefinite program. By examples, we show that these algorithms can often be used in tandem, in conjunction with convexity arguments, to determine if a quantum state can offer nonclassical correlations and hence violates a given Bell inequality. On the other hand, since a standard Bell experiment typically involves measurements over many copies of the quantum systems, we have also investigated the possibility of enhancing the strength of nonclassical correlation by, instead, performing collective measurements on multiple copies of the quantum systems. Our findings show that even without postselection, such joint measurements may also lead to stronger nonclassical correlations, and hence a better Bell inequality violation. Meanwhile, previous studies have indicated that entangled state admitting locally causal models may still lead to observable nonclassical correlations if, prior to a standard Bell experiment, the state is subjected to some appropriate local preprocessing. This phenomenon of hidden nonlocality was discovered more than a decade ago, but to date, it is still not known if all entangled states can demonstrate nonclassical correlations through these more sophisticated Bell experiments. A key result in this thesis then consists of showing that for all bipartite entangled states, observable nonclassical correlations, in the form of a Bell-CHSH inequality violation, can indeed be derived if we allow both local preprocessing and the usage of shared ancillary state which by itself does not violate the Bell-CHSH inequality. This establishes a kind of equivalence between bipartite entanglement and states that cannot be simulated by classical correlations. In summary, for a standard Bell experiment where no local preprocessing on a quantum state r is allowed, we have provided two algorithms that can be used in tandem to determine if r can be simulated by a locally causal theory, whereas in the scenario where local preprocessing is allowed, we have demonstrated that bipartite entangled states are precisely those which cannot always be simulated classically.
INTRODUCTION Fine (1982) proved that Bell's (1964) inequalities are sufficient, as well as necessary, to guarantee the existence of a joint probability distribution of the random variables in question, e.g., those representing certain spin correlation experiments. Garg and Mermin (1982) gave an example of eight random variables satisfying Bell's inequalities but such that no joint distribution exists. The purpose of this paper is to extend Bell's inequalities to obtain some general necessary conditions for the existence of a joint probability distribution for any finite collection of Bell-type random variables. Our results show that, for N > 4, many new elementary inequalities beyond those of Bell must be satisfied by any hidden-variable theory. Since these additional inequalities are violated by quantum mechanical predictions for appropriate choice of measurement arrangements, they serve to increase the conceptual distance between what may be called Einstein locality, after the EPR paradox, and quantum mechanics. To give a concrete sense of the nature of our results, we exhibit one of the new inequalities violated by Garg and Mermin's example. For theoretical purposes it will suffice to introduce Bell-type random variables X 1 ,…, X N , N ≥ 4, having possible values ±1, with means E ( X i ) = 0 and with what we term Bell covariances E ( X i X j ) relative to the index i 0 , with 1 ≤ i ≤ i 0 , N , 2 ≤ i 0 N – 2. Notice that, when N = 4, we must, as is familiar, have i 0 = 2.
In the early 1960s, John Bell decided to look once again at the hidden variable problem in quantum mechanics, through an examination of the A. Einstein, with B. Podolsky and N. Rosen (EPR) paradox. Proposals for proofs against the possibility of hidden variables had been advanced both before and after EPR. Bell developed both a “theorem” and an inequality, but this may be overstating the case. Most interpretations are that Bell is ruling out any “action-at-a-distance” type of interactions or variables, but would accept that such forces could violate the inequality. By triple of random variables, mentioned by A. Yu. Krennikov, one has to think once again about the experiment suggested by the Bell inequality. Bell has assumed that the set of hidden variables, and more importantly the probability function of the hidden variables, is unchanging. K. Hess and Walter Philipp began to worry about this assumption, because it has some implicit assumptions of its own.