Mean-field analysis of quantum annealing with XX-type terms

秀稔 西森, Hidetoshi Nishimori

優也 関, Yuya Seki

Sei Suzuki, Hidetoshi Nishimori, Masuo Suzuki

We introduce transverse ferromagnetic interactions, in addition to a simple transverse field, to accelerate the convergence of quantum annealing of the random-field Ising model. The conventional approach using only the transverse-field term is known to be plagued by slow convergence when the true ground state has strong ferromagnetic characteristics for the random-field Ising model. The transverse ferromagnetic interactions are shown to improve the performance significantly in such cases. This conclusion is drawn from the analyses of the energy eigenvalues of instantaneous stationary states as well as by the very fast algorithm of Bethe-type mean-field annealing adopted to quantum systems. The present study highlights the importance of a flexible choice of the type of quantum fluctuations to achieve the best possible performance in quantum annealing. The existence of such flexibility is an outstanding advantage of quantum annealing over simulated annealing.

悟史 森田

悠 山城, Yu Yamashiro, 秀稔 西森 +2 more

Reverse annealing is a relatively new variant of quantum annealing in which one starts from a classical state and increases and then decreases the amplitude of the transverse field, in the hope of finding a better classical state than the initial state for a given optimization problem.We numerically study the unitary quantum dynamics of reverse annealing for the mean-field-type p-spin model and show that the results are consistent with the predictions of equilibrium statistical mechanics.In particular, we corroborate the equilibrium analysis prediction that reverse annealing provides an exponential speedup over conventional quantum annealing in terms of solving the p-spin model.This lends support to the expectation that equilibrium analyses are effective at revealing essential aspects of the dynamics of quantum annealing.We also compare the results of quantum dynamics with the corresponding classical dynamics to reveal their similarities and differences.We distinguish between two reverse annealing protocols we call adiabatic and iterated reverse annealing.We further show that iterated reverse annealing, as has been realized in the D-Wave device, is ineffective in the case of the p-spin model but note that a recently introduced protocol ("h-gain"), which implements adiabatic reverse annealing, may lead to improved performance.

Yazhen Wang, Shang Wu, Hongzhi Liu