Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in the foundations methodology and philosophy of science

The Quantum State Vector and Physical Reality

Peter G. Bergmann

Published Jan 1, 1967• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-88026-1_4

Related papers

Can category-theoretic semantics resolve the problem of the interpretation of the quantum state vector?

Arkady Bolotin

Do correctness and completeness of quantum mechanics jointly imply that quantum state vectors are necessarily in one-to-one correspondence with elements of the physical reality? In terms of category theory, such a correspondence would stand for an isomorphism, so the problem of the status of the quantum state vector could be turned into the question of whether state vectors are necessarily isomorphic to elements of the reality. As it is argued in the present paper, in order to tackle this question, one needs to complement the category-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics with the computational-complexity-theoretic considerations. Based on such considerations, it is demonstrated in the paper that the hypothesis of the isomorphism existing between state vectors and elements of the reality is expected to be unsuitable for a generic quantum system.

arXiv:1502.06676•Feb 24, 2015•0 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICAL REALITY

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•May 1, 2003•0 citations

The state vector of a quantum system: Mathematical fiction or physical reality?

Aleksandr V. Belinsky, A. K. Zhukovskiy

A version of an experiment with a correlated pair of entangled particles is considered. This experiment demonstrates an interesting effect of variations in the entangled photon polarization that shows the reality of all of the various superposition components and the corresponding state vector of the quantum system. The possible consequences of this are analyzed.

Moscow University Physics Bulletin•May 1, 2016•9 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality

Niels Henrik David Bohr

Niels Bohr•Jan 1, 1996•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality

Hugh C. Wolfe

Physical Review•Feb 1, 1936•21 citations

Ways to describe dynamical state-vector reduction

Philip Pearle

The continuous-spontaneous-localization (CSL) description of state-vector reduction allows one to describe reality by the state vector. The mathematical structure of the theory, based upon a c-number white-noise source interacting with the quantum system, is reviewed. Then this description is generalized in two ways. First, a generalization is made to a wide class of c-number stochastic processes: using the square root of the probability density functional of the process, it is shown how to construct an evolution equation for the state vector which results in state-vector reduction. Second, within this wider framework the c-number source is completely eliminated and replaced by quantum operators, dubbed ``index'' operators, representing new physical variables which interact with the quantum system. In this case the state vector cannot represent reality as in the previous case, but it is shown how to write it unambiguously as a sum of ``preferred basis'' states, any one of which can represent reality. Therefore this quantum theory is open to the ensemble interpretation, where ``ensemble'' refers to the collection of possible real states. Three requirements sufficient for a viable ensemble interpretation are specified. It is shown how to satisfy these requirements, obtaining a purely quantum model that is equivalent to CSL and capable of describing reality.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1993•57 citations
Do correctness and completeness of quantum mechanics jointly imply that quantum state vectors are necessarily in one-to-one correspondence with elements of the physical reality? In terms of category theory, such a correspondence would stand for an isomorphism, so the problem of the status of the quantum state vector could be turned into the question of whether state vectors are necessarily isomorphic to elements of the reality. As it is argued in the present paper, in order to tackle this question, one needs to complement the category-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics with the computational-complexity-theoretic considerations. Based on such considerations, it is demonstrated in the paper that the hypothesis of the isomorphism existing between state vectors and elements of the reality is expected to be unsuitable for a generic quantum system.
The continuous-spontaneous-localization (CSL) description of state-vector reduction allows one to describe reality by the state vector. The mathematical structure of the theory, based upon a c-number white-noise source interacting with the quantum system, is reviewed. Then this description is generalized in two ways. First, a generalization is made to a wide class of c-number stochastic processes: using the square root of the probability density functional of the process, it is shown how to construct an evolution equation for the state vector which results in state-vector reduction. Second, within this wider framework the c-number source is completely eliminated and replaced by quantum operators, dubbed ``index'' operators, representing new physical variables which interact with the quantum system. In this case the state vector cannot represent reality as in the previous case, but it is shown how to write it unambiguously as a sum of ``preferred basis'' states, any one of which can represent reality. Therefore this quantum theory is open to the ensemble interpretation, where ``ensemble'' refers to the collection of possible real states. Three requirements sufficient for a viable ensemble interpretation are specified. It is shown how to satisfy these requirements, obtaining a purely quantum model that is equivalent to CSL and capable of describing reality.