Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Physica Polonica A

J1-J2-J3Model with Long-Range Lieb-Mattis Interaction

Sven E. Krüger, Johannes Richter

Published Feb 1, 1997• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Stimulated by the two-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet with first-, second-, and third-neighbor couplings (J1-J2-J3 model) we consider a corresponding three-parameter model with a long-range antiferromagnetic Lieb-Mattis interaction.This model can be solved exactly and leads to a better understanding of the role of frustration in the J1 -J2-J3 model.We calculate the correłations in the groundstate and consider their finite size behavior.Furthermore we present the full thermodynamic phase diagram.We find the possibility of a disordered phase at T = 0.

DOI
10.12693/aphyspola.91.377

Related papers

Integrable Models of Interacting Quantum Spins with Competing Interactions

Johannes Richter, Sven E. Krüger, A Voigt +1 more

We present a class of exactly solvable quantum spin models which consist of two Heisenberg subsystems coupled via a long-range Lieb-Mattis interaction. The total system is exactly solvable whenever the individual subsystems are solvable and allows to study the effects of frustration. We consider i) the antiferromagnetic linear chain and ii) the Lieb-Mattis antiferromagnet for the subsystem Hamiltonians and present i) the complete ground-state phase diagram and ii) the full thermodynamic phase diagram. We find a novel phase which exhibits order-from-disorder phenomena.

arXiv:cond-mat/9411035•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Nov 10, 1994•6 citations

Frustrated J1−J2−J3 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the simple cubic lattice

J. Oitmaa

We use series expansion methods to investigate the phase diagram of a frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the simple cubic lattice, with interactions extending to third neighbors. Our results do not support a recent prediction of a rather large paramagnetic phase at zero temperature, but do show behavior which may be indicative of a small disordered region near the point of maximum frustration.

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 24, 2017•7 citations

Layered frustrated antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin model: role of inplane frustration and interlayer coupling

Haque, Md Mahfoozul, M. A. H. Ahsan, Jamal Berakdar +1 more

We present an exact diagonalization study on layered $J_{1}-J_{2}$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin model to examine the role of frustration induced by inplane next-nearest neighbor coupling $J_{2}$, in presence of interlayer antiferromagnetic coupling $J_{\perp}$. A finite lattice of 24 spins in layered geometry of $(4\times 3)\oplus (4\times 3)$ is considered and the resulting Hamiltonian matrix diagonalized using Davidson iterative algorithm to obtain the ground and a few low-lying excited states. The lattice size ($24$ spins with Hilbert space dimensionality of $2704156$ in $S_{z}^{tot}=0$ subspace) has been kept relatively small because of the large number of runs required to sample $J_{1}-J_{2}-J_{\perp}$ parameter space. Quantities like spin-gap, Shannon entropy, spin-spin correlation, static spin structure-factor, magnetic specific-heat and magnetic susceptibility are calculated for various values of spin-spin coupling parameters. With increase in interlayer coupling, the system is driven to states with long range order and the interval of quantum paramagnetically disordered state, sandwiched between Néel and collinear ordered states, narrows on the scale of inplane frustration parameter.

arXiv:1603.02601•Mar 8, 2016•0 citations

Spin-1/2 frustrated antiferromagnet on a spatially anisotopic square lattice: contribution of exact diagonalizations

Philippe Sindzingre

The phase diagram of a spin-1/2 $J-J'-J_2$ model is investigated by means of exact diagonalizations on finite samples. This model is a generalization of the $J_1-J_2$ model on the square lattice with two different nearest-neighbor couplings $J,J'$ and may be also viewed as an array of coupled Heisenberg chains. The results suggest that the resonnating valence bond state predicted by Nersesyan and Tsvelik [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 024422 (2003)] for $J_2=0.5J' \ll J$ is realized and extends beyond the limit of small interchain coupling along a curve nearly coincident with the line where the energy per spin is maximum. This line is likely bordered on both side by a columnar dimer long range order. This columnar order could extends for $J'\to J$ which correspond to the $J_1-J_2$ model.

•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of the spin- 12 square-lattice J1 - J2 model with plaquette structure

Oliver Götze, Sven E. Krüger, F. Fleck +2 more

Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (${J}_{1}>0$) as well as ferromagnetic (${J}_{1}<0$) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction ${J}_{2}>0$. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic ${J}_{1}$) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case $s=1/2$. For the antiferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}>0$) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}<0$) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|$. By increasing ${J}_{2}$ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length $s=2$ are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of ${J}_{2}$ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.

arXiv:1205.0681•Physical Review B•Jun 21, 2012•16 citations

Spin-1/2 frustrated antiferromagnet on a spatially anisotropic square lattice: Contribution of exact diagonalizations

Philippe Sindzingre

The phase diagram of a spin-1/2 $J\ensuremath{-}{J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ model is investigated by means of exact diagonalizations on finite samples. This model is a generalization of the ${J}_{1}--{J}_{2}$ model on the square lattice with two different nearest-neighbor couplings ${J,J}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and may also be viewed as an array of coupled Heisenberg chains. The results suggest that the resonating valence bond state predicted by Nersesyan and Tsvelik [Phys. Rev. B 67, 024422 (2003)] for ${J}_{2}{=0.5J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\ll}J$ is realized and extends beyond the limit of small interchain coupling along a curve nearly coincident with the line where the energy per spin is maximum. This line is likely bordered on both sides by a columnar dimer long range order. This columnar order could extend for ${J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}J$ which correspond to the ${J}_{1}--{J}_{2}$ model.

arXiv:cond-mat/0307118•Physical Review B•Mar 19, 2004•46 citations
Stimulated by the two-dimensional frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet with first-, second-, and third-neighbor couplings (J1-J2-J3 model) we consider a corresponding three-parameter model with a long-range antiferromagnetic Lieb-Mattis interaction.This model can be solved exactly and leads to a better understanding of the role of frustration in the J1 -J2-J3 model.We calculate the correłations in the groundstate and consider their finite size behavior.Furthermore we present the full thermodynamic phase diagram.We find the possibility of a disordered phase at T = 0.
We present a class of exactly solvable quantum spin models which consist of two Heisenberg subsystems coupled via a long-range Lieb-Mattis interaction. The total system is exactly solvable whenever the individual subsystems are solvable and allows to study the effects of frustration. We consider i) the antiferromagnetic linear chain and ii) the Lieb-Mattis antiferromagnet for the subsystem Hamiltonians and present i) the complete ground-state phase diagram and ii) the full thermodynamic phase diagram. We find a novel phase which exhibits order-from-disorder phenomena.
We use series expansion methods to investigate the phase diagram of a frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the simple cubic lattice, with interactions extending to third neighbors. Our results do not support a recent prediction of a rather large paramagnetic phase at zero temperature, but do show behavior which may be indicative of a small disordered region near the point of maximum frustration.
We present an exact diagonalization study on layered J1−J2J_{1}-J_{2}J1​−J2​ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin model to examine the role of frustration induced by inplane next-nearest neighbor coupling J2J_{2}J2​, in presence of interlayer antiferromagnetic coupling J⊥J_{\perp}J⊥​. A finite lattice of 24 spins in layered geometry of (4×3)⊕(4×3)(4\times 3)\oplus (4\times 3)(4×3)⊕(4×3) is considered and the resulting Hamiltonian matrix diagonalized using Davidson iterative algorithm to obtain the ground and a few low-lying excited states. The lattice size (242424 spins with Hilbert space dimensionality of 270415627041562704156 in Sztot=0S_{z}^{tot}=0Sztot​=0 subspace) has been kept relatively small because of the large number of runs required to sample J1−J2−J⊥J_{1}-J_{2}-J_{\perp}J1​−J2​−J⊥​ parameter space. Quantities like spin-gap, Shannon entropy, spin-spin correlation, static spin structure-factor, magnetic specific-heat and magnetic susceptibility are calculated for various values of spin-spin coupling parameters. With increase in interlayer coupling, the system is driven to states with long range order and the interval of quantum paramagnetically disordered state, sandwiched between Néel and collinear ordered states, narrows on the scale of inplane frustration parameter.
The phase diagram of a spin-1/2 J−J′−J2J-J'-J_2J−J′−J2​ model is investigated by means of exact diagonalizations on finite samples. This model is a generalization of the J1−J2J_1-J_2J1​−J2​ model on the square lattice with two different nearest-neighbor couplings J,J′J,J'J,J′ and may be also viewed as an array of coupled Heisenberg chains. The results suggest that the resonnating valence bond state predicted by Nersesyan and Tsvelik [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 024422 (2003)] for J2=0.5J′≪JJ_2=0.5J' \ll JJ2​=0.5J′≪J is realized and extends beyond the limit of small interchain coupling along a curve nearly coincident with the line where the energy per spin is maximum. This line is likely bordered on both side by a columnar dimer long range order. This columnar order could extends for J′→JJ'\to JJ′→J which correspond to the J1−J2J_1-J_2J1​−J2​ model.
Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) as well as ferromagnetic (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic J1{J}_{1}J1​) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case s=1/2s=1/2s=1/2. For the antiferromagnetic case (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small J2/∣J1∣{J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|J2​/∣J1​∣. By increasing J2{J}_{2}J2​ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length s=2s=2s=2 are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of J2{J}_{2}J2​ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.
The phase diagram of a spin-1/2 $J\ensuremath{-}{J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}{J}_{2}$ model is investigated by means of exact diagonalizations on finite samples. This model is a generalization of the J1−−J2{J}_{1}--{J}_{2}J1​−−J2​ model on the square lattice with two different nearest-neighbor couplings ${J,J}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and may also be viewed as an array of coupled Heisenberg chains. The results suggest that the resonating valence bond state predicted by Nersesyan and Tsvelik [Phys. Rev. B 67, 024422 (2003)] for ${J}_{2}{=0.5J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\ll}J$ is realized and extends beyond the limit of small interchain coupling along a curve nearly coincident with the line where the energy per spin is maximum. This line is likely bordered on both sides by a columnar dimer long range order. This columnar order could extend for ${J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}J$ which correspond to the J1−−J2{J}_{1}--{J}_{2}J1​−−J2​ model.