Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

PHASE-NONLINEARITY INTERPLAY IN SMALL QUANTUM SYSTEMS

S. Raghavan, V. M. Kenkre, A. R. Bishop

Published May 1, 1995• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814503877_0050

Related papers

NONLINEAR PHASE STABILIZATION IN QUANTUM INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Andriy Lemeshko, Isamu Ohnishi

•Jul 16, 2026•0 citations

PHASE TRANSITIONS IN SMALL AND LONG-RANGE INTERACTING SYSTEMS.

Yaroslav Ispolatov

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Nonlinear interactions in quantum systems

P. K. Shukla, Bengt Eliasson

Contemporary Physics•May 1, 2008•0 citations

Quantum Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Learning Conservative and Dissipative Dynamics via Measurement-Induced Nonlinearity

Dibakar Sigdel

We introduce Quantum Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks (Q-pHNNs), parameterised quantum circuits that learn classical dynamics in a structure-preserving manner. The framework rests on the Isomorphic Hamiltonian Mapping (IHM): the skew-symmetric interconnection matrix $\mathbf{J}$ corresponds to unitary gate evolution, and the positive-semidefinite dissipation matrix $\mathbf{R}$ to Measurement-Induced NonLinearity (MINL), realised by mid-circuit measurement with classical feedforward. Conservation and passivity are then enforced by construction rather than by penalty terms, and dissipation becomes an intrinsically quantum effect: energy leaves through the act of measurement. We instantiate the IHM in three architectures: a Quantum HNN that extracts Hamilton's equations via the Parameter-Shift Rule; a Q-pHNN that dissipates through MINL; and a topology-entangled Quantum Graph Neural Network lifting both channels to $N$-node coupled-phasor networks. In simulation, where every model here was trained, we obtain $1.35\%$ relative energy drift under a symplectic integrator, $100\%$ energy monotonicity for the single-oscillator MINL circuit, and $92$--$98\%$ phase-space energy decay across ring, star and chain networks at $N\in\{3,6,9\}$. On an IBM Heron processor the trained energy surface and its parameter-shift gradients reproduce their simulated values, with an error budget dominated by readout rather than gate infidelity; the dissipative channel executes natively, but its decay is not separable from measurement back-action at these depths.

arXiv:2607.12269•Jul 14, 2026•0 citations

Quantum nonlinearities at the single-particle level

Dario Gerace, Fabrice P. Laussy, D. Sanvitto

Nature Materials•Feb 18, 2019•16 citations

Nonlinear resonance in quantum systems

Edward Shuryak

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1976•14 citations
We introduce Quantum Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks (Q-pHNNs), parameterised quantum circuits that learn classical dynamics in a structure-preserving manner. The framework rests on the Isomorphic Hamiltonian Mapping (IHM): the skew-symmetric interconnection matrix J\mathbf{J}J corresponds to unitary gate evolution, and the positive-semidefinite dissipation matrix R\mathbf{R}R to Measurement-Induced NonLinearity (MINL), realised by mid-circuit measurement with classical feedforward. Conservation and passivity are then enforced by construction rather than by penalty terms, and dissipation becomes an intrinsically quantum effect: energy leaves through the act of measurement. We instantiate the IHM in three architectures: a Quantum HNN that extracts Hamilton's equations via the Parameter-Shift Rule; a Q-pHNN that dissipates through MINL; and a topology-entangled Quantum Graph Neural Network lifting both channels to NNN-node coupled-phasor networks. In simulation, where every model here was trained, we obtain 1.35%1.35\%1.35% relative energy drift under a symplectic integrator, 100%100\%100% energy monotonicity for the single-oscillator MINL circuit, and 929292--98%98\%98% phase-space energy decay across ring, star and chain networks at N∈{3,6,9}N\in\{3,6,9\}N∈{3,6,9}. On an IBM Heron processor the trained energy surface and its parameter-shift gradients reproduce their simulated values, with an error budget dominated by readout rather than gate infidelity; the dissipative channel executes natively, but its decay is not separable from measurement back-action at these depths.