Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Simulation of wave-function microscopy images of Stark resonances

Libo Zhao, Dehang Xiao, I. I. Fabrikant

Published Apr 10, 2015• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Wave-function microscopy images for Stark resonance states of H atoms are simulated using the quantum-mechanical formalism developed previously. Spatial distributions of ejected electron current densities are compared with experiment, and a good agreement is shown. The nonzero values of minima in the experimentally observed electron current distributions are reproduced by convoluting the theoretical current distribution with an instrumental function representing uncertainties in the position. Our relative strengths of the ejected electron current densities differ from those calculated with the wave packet propagation technique. We show that for the full convergence of the calculation, the distance between the ionized atom and the detector should exceed $10\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.91.043405

Related papers

Hydrogen Atoms under Magnification: Direct Observation of the Nodal Structure of Stark States

Aneta S. Stodolna, Arnaud Rouzée, F. Lépine +6 more

To describe the microscopic properties of matter, quantum mechanics uses wave functions, whose structure and time dependence is governed by the Schrödinger equation. In atoms the charge distributions described by the wave function are rarely observed. The hydrogen atom is unique, since it only has one electron and, in a dc electric field, the Stark Hamiltonian is exactly separable in terms of parabolic coordinates (η, ξ, φ). As a result, the microscopic wave function along the ξ coordinate that exists in the vicinity of the atom, and the projection of the continuum wave function measured at a macroscopic distance, share the same nodal structure. In this Letter, we report photoionization microscopy experiments where this nodal structure is directly observed. The experiments provide a validation of theoretical predictions that have been made over the last three decades.

Physical Review Letters•May 20, 2013•145 citations

Photoionization microscopy of the lithium atom: Wave-function imaging of quasibound and continuum Stark states

S. Cohen, M. M. Harb, A. Ollagnier +5 more

Photoionization of an atom in the presence of a uniform static electric field provides the unique opportunity to expand and visualize the atomic wave function at a macroscopic scale. In a number of seminal publications dating back to the 1980s, Fabrikant, Demkov, Kondratovich, and Ostrovsky showed that this goal could be achieved by projecting slow (meV) photoionized electrons onto a position-sensitive detector and underlined the distinction between continuum and resonant contributions. The uncovering of resonant signatures was achieved fairly recently in experiments on the nonhydrogenic lithium atoms [Cohen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 183001 (2013)]. The purpose of the present article is the general description of these findings, with emphasis on the various manifestations of resonant character. From this point of view, lithium has been chosen as an illustrative example between the two limiting cases of hydrogen, where resonance effects are more easily identified, and heavy atoms like xenon, where resonant effects were not observed.

Physical Review A•Jul 19, 2016•21 citations

Measurement of the electronic momentum distributions of Rydberg Stark states

Jeremy Murray-Krezan, R. R. Jones

Approximate momentum distributions of Rydberg electrons in static electric fields have been obtained using an improved impulsive momentum retrieval (IMR) technique. An imaging detector enables the measurement of half-cycle pulse (HCP) ionization probability across the spatial profile of a focused half-cycle pulse beam. By modulating the HCP amplitude we directly measure the derivative of the ionization vs HCP impulse curve, enabling the recovery of momentum distributions with better resolution than previously demonstrated with IMR. For example, for Stark states with small dipole moments, we observe predicted fine-structure in the projection of the momentum distribution along the Stark field axis. We use a semiclassical model to simulate the effect that the nonzero HCP duration has on our measurements. Good agreement between simulated and measured momentum distributions is obtained.

Physical Review A•Jun 8, 2007•5 citations

Measurement of Self-coherence in the Transmission Electron Microscope for Detecting Time-dependent Coherent-inelastic Electron Scattering in the Heisenberg Limit

Christian F. Kisielowski, Peta Specht, Joerg Ralf Jinschek +1 more

Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].

Microscopy and Microanalysis•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Photoionization microscopy: linear polarization rotation effects

Panagiotis Kalaitzis, Sotirios Danakas, F. Lépine +2 more

Synopsis Photoionization microscopy (PM) aims at imaging the flux of slow (meV) electrons released by atomic photoionization in the presence of a static electric field. We discuss the rotation of the linear light polari-zation with respect to the electric field direction. Two-photon ionization out of an m=0 initial state allows for the population of |m|=0,1,2 Stark states. The resulting |m|-beating effects in the PM images are demonstrated theoretically (in hydrogen atom) and experimentally (in Mg atom). Implications on the applicability of tomographic techniques for slow electrons are also discussed.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Phase sensitive coherent control excitation schemes applied to photoionization microscopy of the hydrogen atom

Panagiotis Kalaitzis, Sotirios Danakas, Katerina Ferentinou +3 more

Synopsis Photoionization microscopy (PM) is employed for imaging the flux of slow (meV) electrons ejected via atomic photoionization in the presence of a static electric field. Just above the ionization limit continuum and quasi-disrete states are degenerate. In hydrogen atom resonant excitation dominates over the continuum one, while the reverse holds for more complex atoms. We demonstrate theoretically that by using a bichromatic ω/2ω laser field and by applying phase sensitive coherent control techniques it is possible to unbury and isolate other-wise obscured resonant features in PM images.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations
Wave-function microscopy images for Stark resonance states of H atoms are simulated using the quantum-mechanical formalism developed previously. Spatial distributions of ejected electron current densities are compared with experiment, and a good agreement is shown. The nonzero values of minima in the experimentally observed electron current distributions are reproduced by convoluting the theoretical current distribution with an instrumental function representing uncertainties in the position. Our relative strengths of the ejected electron current densities differ from those calculated with the wave packet propagation technique. We show that for the full convergence of the calculation, the distance between the ionized atom and the detector should exceed 10\ensuremathμm10\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}10\ensuremathμm.
To describe the microscopic properties of matter, quantum mechanics uses wave functions, whose structure and time dependence is governed by the Schrödinger equation. In atoms the charge distributions described by the wave function are rarely observed. The hydrogen atom is unique, since it only has one electron and, in a dc electric field, the Stark Hamiltonian is exactly separable in terms of parabolic coordinates (η, ξ, φ). As a result, the microscopic wave function along the ξ coordinate that exists in the vicinity of the atom, and the projection of the continuum wave function measured at a macroscopic distance, share the same nodal structure. In this Letter, we report photoionization microscopy experiments where this nodal structure is directly observed. The experiments provide a validation of theoretical predictions that have been made over the last three decades.
Photoionization of an atom in the presence of a uniform static electric field provides the unique opportunity to expand and visualize the atomic wave function at a macroscopic scale. In a number of seminal publications dating back to the 1980s, Fabrikant, Demkov, Kondratovich, and Ostrovsky showed that this goal could be achieved by projecting slow (meV) photoionized electrons onto a position-sensitive detector and underlined the distinction between continuum and resonant contributions. The uncovering of resonant signatures was achieved fairly recently in experiments on the nonhydrogenic lithium atoms [Cohen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 183001 (2013)]. The purpose of the present article is the general description of these findings, with emphasis on the various manifestations of resonant character. From this point of view, lithium has been chosen as an illustrative example between the two limiting cases of hydrogen, where resonance effects are more easily identified, and heavy atoms like xenon, where resonant effects were not observed.
Approximate momentum distributions of Rydberg electrons in static electric fields have been obtained using an improved impulsive momentum retrieval (IMR) technique. An imaging detector enables the measurement of half-cycle pulse (HCP) ionization probability across the spatial profile of a focused half-cycle pulse beam. By modulating the HCP amplitude we directly measure the derivative of the ionization vs HCP impulse curve, enabling the recovery of momentum distributions with better resolution than previously demonstrated with IMR. For example, for Stark states with small dipole moments, we observe predicted fine-structure in the projection of the momentum distribution along the Stark field axis. We use a semiclassical model to simulate the effect that the nonzero HCP duration has on our measurements. Good agreement between simulated and measured momentum distributions is obtained.
Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].
Synopsis Photoionization microscopy (PM) aims at imaging the flux of slow (meV) electrons released by atomic photoionization in the presence of a static electric field. We discuss the rotation of the linear light polari-zation with respect to the electric field direction. Two-photon ionization out of an m=0 initial state allows for the population of |m|=0,1,2 Stark states. The resulting |m|-beating effects in the PM images are demonstrated theoretically (in hydrogen atom) and experimentally (in Mg atom). Implications on the applicability of tomographic techniques for slow electrons are also discussed.
Synopsis Photoionization microscopy (PM) is employed for imaging the flux of slow (meV) electrons ejected via atomic photoionization in the presence of a static electric field. Just above the ionization limit continuum and quasi-disrete states are degenerate. In hydrogen atom resonant excitation dominates over the continuum one, while the reverse holds for more complex atoms. We demonstrate theoretically that by using a bichromatic ω/2ω laser field and by applying phase sensitive coherent control techniques it is possible to unbury and isolate other-wise obscured resonant features in PM images.