Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Measurement Techniques

Threshold sensitivity of quantum magnetometric instruments

N. I. Ivanov

Published Nov 1, 1978• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00832074

Related papers

Magnetometric Probe of an Ultra-cold Spinor Gas

James Higbie

APS•May 1, 2014•0 citations

Applications of quantum interference effects to magnetometry

Roland Lammegger, Arno Huss, Stefan Leopold Hatzl +1 more

•Sep 20, 2004•0 citations

MIMS_v7.4.1_Multimodal_Instrument_for_Spin_Ensemble_Characterization

Walter Ayala

The design of the Multimodal Instrument for Spin Ensemble Characterization(MIMS v7.4.1) is presented. The instrument executes seven independent measure-ment protocols on solid-state spin ensembles, operating under controlled vacuum con-ditions to minimize environmental decoherence.• Standard Protocol: Multi-exponential relaxation dynamics.• RAE Protocol: Controlled interruption of entanglement.• TEBC Protocol: Response under magnetic field near the correlation loss threshold(effective phenomenological model).• PDE Protocol: Diagnosis of response patterns under magnetic constraint.• REU Protocol: Correlational restoration with synchronized pulses.• SBR Protocol: Edge-of-rupture sensor (regulated phenomenological model).• SBR-REU Protocol: Combined amplification and restoration mode.Eight sensor channels (expandable to nine with Mössbauer in Plan B) monitor fourspin ensembles. Entanglement operates in micro-windows (∼ 100 µs–1 ms) withineach macroscopic cycle.The vacuum chamber (< 10−5 mbar) eliminates collisional decoherence. PlanB incorporates Mössbauer for independent cross-validation.Computational simulation (Appendix E) validates the statistical architecture.All protocols achieve positive detection under controlled conditions. ChannelsCH4 (SQUID) and CH6 (SERF) dominate magnetometric sensitivity; secondarychannels provide instrumental veto, cross-validation, and pattern classification.Construction cost: $850,000–$5,000,000+ USD. Timeline: 66–78 months.

•May 17, 2026•0 citations

Sensitive superconducting quantum magnetometer

B. V. Vasiliev, V. G. Grebinnik, V. G. Simkin

•Jan 1, 1973•1 citation

Magnetometric sensitivity optimization for nonlinear optical rotation with frequency-modulated light: Rubidium D2 line

Derek F. Jackson Kimball, Louis Jacome, Srikanth Guttikonda +2 more

Atomic spin polarization of alkali atoms in the ground-state can survive thousands of collisions with paraffin-coated cell walls. The resulting long spin-relaxation times achieved in evacuated, paraffin-coated cells enable precise measurement of atomic spin precession and energy shifts of ground-state Zeeman sublevels. In the present work, nonlinear magneto-optical rotation with frequency-modulated light (FM NMOR) is used to measure magnetic field-induced spin precession for rubidium atoms contained in a paraffin-coated cell. The magnetometric sensitivity of FM NMOR for the rubidium D2 line is studied as a function of light power, detuning, frequency-modulation amplitude, and rubidium vapor density. For a 5-cm-diameter cell at temperature T≈35 °C, the optimal shot-noise-projected magnetometric sensitivity is found to be 2×10−11 G/Hz (corresponding to a sensitivity to spin precession frequency of ≈10 μHz/Hz or a sensitivity to Zeeman sublevel shifts of ≈4×10−20 eV/Hz).

arXiv:0906.3586•Journal of Applied Physics•Sep 15, 2009•32 citations

Sensitivity in Quantum Measurements

Vladimir B. Braginsky

•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation
The design of the Multimodal Instrument for Spin Ensemble Characterization(MIMS v7.4.1) is presented. The instrument executes seven independent measure-ment protocols on solid-state spin ensembles, operating under controlled vacuum con-ditions to minimize environmental decoherence.• Standard Protocol: Multi-exponential relaxation dynamics.• RAE Protocol: Controlled interruption of entanglement.• TEBC Protocol: Response under magnetic field near the correlation loss threshold(effective phenomenological model).• PDE Protocol: Diagnosis of response patterns under magnetic constraint.• REU Protocol: Correlational restoration with synchronized pulses.• SBR Protocol: Edge-of-rupture sensor (regulated phenomenological model).• SBR-REU Protocol: Combined amplification and restoration mode.Eight sensor channels (expandable to nine with Mössbauer in Plan B) monitor fourspin ensembles. Entanglement operates in micro-windows (∼ 100 µs–1 ms) withineach macroscopic cycle.The vacuum chamber (< 10−5 mbar) eliminates collisional decoherence. PlanB incorporates Mössbauer for independent cross-validation.Computational simulation (Appendix E) validates the statistical architecture.All protocols achieve positive detection under controlled conditions. ChannelsCH4 (SQUID) and CH6 (SERF) dominate magnetometric sensitivity; secondarychannels provide instrumental veto, cross-validation, and pattern classification.Construction cost: $850,000–$5,000,000+ USD. Timeline: 66–78 months.
Atomic spin polarization of alkali atoms in the ground-state can survive thousands of collisions with paraffin-coated cell walls. The resulting long spin-relaxation times achieved in evacuated, paraffin-coated cells enable precise measurement of atomic spin precession and energy shifts of ground-state Zeeman sublevels. In the present work, nonlinear magneto-optical rotation with frequency-modulated light (FM NMOR) is used to measure magnetic field-induced spin precession for rubidium atoms contained in a paraffin-coated cell. The magnetometric sensitivity of FM NMOR for the rubidium D2 line is studied as a function of light power, detuning, frequency-modulation amplitude, and rubidium vapor density. For a 5-cm-diameter cell at temperature T≈35 °C, the optimal shot-noise-projected magnetometric sensitivity is found to be 2×10−11 G/Hz (corresponding to a sensitivity to spin precession frequency of ≈10 μHz/Hz or a sensitivity to Zeeman sublevel shifts of ≈4×10−20 eV/Hz).