Tradeoffs in measurement and information are one of the central themes of quantum mechanics. I will try to summarize in this talk a few of our experiments related to modern views of these topics. In particular, I will try to give an example or two of the power of "weak measurements," both for fundamental physics and for possible precision metrology. One example will involve revisiting the question of Heisenberg's famous principle, and an interpretation which is widespread but has now been experimentally shown to be incorrect. Then I will also discuss ongoing work on a "quantum data compression" protocol which would allow a small-scale quantum memory to store all the extractable information from a larger ensemble of identically prepared systems.
Abstract Heisenberg’s original uncertainty relation is related to measurement effect, which is different from the preparation uncertainty relation. However, it has been shown that Heisenberg’s error disturbance uncertainty relation is not valid in some cases. We experimentally test the error-tradeoff uncertainty relation by using a continuous-variable Gaussian Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR)-entangled state. Based on the quantum correlation between the two entangled optical beams, the errors on amplitude and phase quadratures of one EPR optical beam coming from joint measurement are estimated, respectively, which are used to verify the error–tradeoff relation. Especially, the error–tradeoff relation for error-free measurement of one observable is verified in our experiment. We also verify the error–tradeoff relations for nonzero errors and mixed state by introducing loss on one EPR beam. Our experimental results demonstrate that Heisenberg’s error–tradeoff relation is violated in some cases for a continuous-variable system, while the Ozawa’s and Branciard’s relations are valid.
Uncertainty principle is one of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. Exploring such uncertainty relations in pre- and postselected (PPS) systems, where weak measurements on post-selected states have been used as a powerful tool for exploring the foundation of quantum mechanics, has so far eluded experimental effort. In this work, we experimentally investigate the Robertson-Heisenberg-type uncertainty relation for two incompatible observables in a PPS system. Through conducting a von Neumann-type measurement, uncertainty relations between two non-commuting Pauli observables are experimentally unveiled. Such uncertainty relations in the PPS system impose limitations on the joint sharp preparation of pre- and postselected states for two incompatible observables. Our experiments would be useful for the development of amplification techniques for precision measurements.
The measurement of a phase difference between two optical modes in an interferometer has several important applications in metrology. This measurement can be useful in several contexts, such as in the detection of gravitational waves. The quantum nature of light imposes a limit on how accurately a phase difference can be measured, this limit being known as the Heisenberg limit (HL). On the other hand, photonic quantum metrology studies alternatives to reach the HL through entangled or squeezed quantum states. According to the theory of parameter estimation, the minimum uncertainty possible in the estimation of a phase
θ considering classical light scales with $1/\sqrt{\Bar{N}}$, where $\Bar{N}$ is the average number of photons. This dependence is known as the standard quantum limit. However, when considering quantum light sources, there is a significant improvement in the estimation of the phase parameter, as its minimum uncertainty can scale with $1/{\Bar{N}}$, known as HL. In this thesis, starting from the relative phase probability distribution P(
ϕ) introduced by Luis and S\'anchez-Soto in 1996, we obtained this distribution for several quantum states of light useful in photonic quantum metrology. We show that, within the numerical precision of our calculations, the Fisher information obtained via the relative phase distribution is equal to the quantum Fisher information for the considered states, such that the average differences between these quantities were on the order of
0,1%. Our results indicate that the relative phase distribution can be used to predict the minimum possible uncertainty in the phase detection process in quantum metrology, since this uncertainty depends on the quantum Fisher information, at least for pure states.