Cambridge University Press eBooks

Irreversible processes

Ulf Leonhardt

Published Feb 18, 2010• 0 citations

Abstract

Lindblad's theorem Although the fundamental laws of physics explain a great deal of the material world, they often seem to contradict our immediate experience. For instance, as physicists we believe that all elementary interactions are reversible, but as people we are immersed in irreversibility. The collision of two atoms may well be reversible and predictable, but for us time flows in a definite direction and life is sometimes unpredictable. “What then is time? If no one asks me, I know what it is. If I wish to explain it to him who asks, I do not know. ” (Attributed to Augustine.) Nevertheless, as we try to explain in this section, one can include irreversibility, the true arrow of time, into quantum mechanics in a concise and elegant form put on solid mathematical ground in Lindblad's theorem (Lindblad, 1976). Having then understood the basics of irreversible quantum dynamics, life may not be quite the same any more. Irreversibility A beam splitter is a reversible optical instrument: one could collect the outgoing light beams and bring them together again in a second beam splitter where they constructively interfere to re-establish the light in its original state. But now imagine a light beam is scattered many times. For example, light entering biological tissue is interacting with each of the cells along its path. Some of the light is scattered and only a part of the light continues in the original direction.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511806117.006

Related papers

Experiment sees the arrow of time – at last!

Nick E. Mavromatos

Everyday experience tells us that it is impossible to travel backwards in time, no matter what science-fiction writers and movie directors tell us. However, this seemingly natural impossibility is actually one of the greatest mysteries in physics. Currently most physicists associate the irreversibility of time with the production of entropy in the warm macroscopic world. One consequence of this irreversibility – often called the “arrow of time” in thermodynamics is the ageing process. In plain terms, one grows old because of the irreversible physical processes that occur during one's life. However, the fundamental classical laws of physics discovered by Galileo, Newton and Einstein do not distinguish between the future and the past. In other words, they appear to be symmetric in time.

Physics WorldDec 1, 19982 citations

Quantum Thermodynamic Irreversibility

George Rajna

For the first time, physicists have performed an experiment confirming that thermodynamic processes are irreversible in a quantum system—meaning that, even on the quantum level, you can't put a broken egg back into its shell. The results have implications for understanding thermodynamics in quantum systems and, in turn, designing quantum computers and other quantum information technologies. [11] Disorder, or entropy, in a microscopic quantum system has been measured by an international group of physicists. The team hopes that the feat will shed light on the of time: the observation that time always marches towards the future. The experiment involved continually flipping the spin of carbon atoms with an oscillating magnetic field and links the emergence of the arrow of time to quantum fluctuations between one atomic spin state and another. [10] Mark M. Wilde, Assistant Professor at Louisiana State University, has improved this theorem in a way that allows for understanding how quantum measurements can be approximately reversed under certain circumstances. The new results allow for understanding how quantum information that has been lost during a measurement can be nearly recovered, which has potential implications for a variety of quantum technologies. [9] Today, we are capable of measuring the position of an object with unprecedented accuracy, but quantum physics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle place fundamental limits on our ability to measure. Noise that arises as a result of the quantum nature of the fields used to make those measurements imposes what is called the standard quantum limit. This same limit influences both the ultrasensitive measurements in nanoscale devices and the kilometer-scale gravitational wave detector at LIGO. Because of this troublesome background noise, we can never know an object's exact location, but a recent study provides a solution for rerouting some of that noise away from the measurement. [8] The accelerating electrons explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the Wave-Particle Duality and the electron’s spin also, building the Bridge between the Classical and Quantum Theories. The Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators explains the electron/proton mass rate and the Weak and Strong Interactions by the diffraction patterns. The Weak Interaction changes the diffraction patterns by moving the electric charge from one side to the other side of the diffraction pattern, which violates the CP and Time reversal symmetry. The diffraction patterns and the locality of the self-maintaining electromagnetic potential explains also the Quantum Entanglement, giving it as a natural part of the relativistic quantum theory.

Dec 1, 20151 citation

The Time Asymmetry of Quantum Mechanics and Concepts of Physical Directionality of Time. Part 1. T Asymmetry of Quantum Probability Laws.

Andrew Holster

This is Part 1 of a four part paper, intended to redress some of the most fundamental confusions in the subject of physical time directionality, and represent the concepts accurately. There are widespread fallacies in the subject that need to be corrected in introductory courses for physics students and philosophers. Parts 1 and 2 are about quantum mechanics, Part 3 is about fundamental concepts, and Part 4 is about cosmology. We start in Part 1 by analysing the time reversal symmetry of quantum probability laws. Time reversal symmetry is defined as the property of invariance under the time reversal transformation, T: t -> -t. It is shown that quantum mechanics (classical or relativistic) is strongly time asymmetric in its probability laws. This contradicts the orthodox analysis, found throughout the conventional literature on physical time, which claims that quantum mechanics is time symmetric or reversible. This is widely claimed as settled scientific fact, and large philosophical and scientific conclusions are drawn from it. But it is an error. The fact is that while quantum mechanics is widely claimed to be reversible on the basis of two formal mathematical properties (that it does have), these properties do not represent invariance under the time reversal transformation. A recent experiment (Batalhao at alia, 2015) showing irreversibility of quantum thermodynamics is discussed as an illustration of this result. Most physicists remain unaware of the errors, decades after they were first demonstrated. Orthodox specialists in the philosophy of time who are aware of the error continue to refer to the ‘time symmetry’ or ‘reversibility’ of quantum mechanics anyway – and exploit the ambiguity to claim false implications about physical time reversal symmetry in nature. The excuse for perpetrating the confusion is that, since it is has now become customary to refer to the formal properties of quantum mechanics as ‘reversibility’ or ‘time reversal symmetry’, we should just keep referring to them by this name, even though they are not time reversal symmetry. This causes endless confusion, in attempts to explain the physical irreversibility of our universe, and in philosophical discussions of implications of physics for the nature of time. The failure of time reversal symmetry in quantum mechanics changes the interpretation of modern physics in a deep way. It changes the problem of explaining the real irreversibility found throughout nature.

Dec 1, 20170 citations

Irreversibility and the arrow of time

Jürg Martin Fröhlich

Within the general formalism of quantum theory irreversibility and the arrow of time and the in the evolution of various physical systems are studied. Irreversible behavior often manifests itself in the guise of “entropy production.” This motivates me to begin this chapter with a brief review of quantum-mechanical entropy, a subject that Elliott Lieb has made outstanding contributions to, followed by an enumeration of examples of irreversible behavior and of an arrow of time analyzed in later sections. Subsequently, a derivation of the laws of thermodynamics from (quantum) statistical mechanics, and, in particular, of the Second Law of thermodynamics, in the forms given to it by Clausius and Carnot, is presented. In a third part, results on diffusive (Brownian) motion of a quantum particle interacting with a quasi-free quantum-mechanical heat bath are reviewed. This is followed by an outline of a theory of friction by emission of Cherenkov radiation of sound waves in a system consisting of a particle moving through a Bose–Einstein condensate and interacting with it. In what may be the most important section of this chapter, the fundamental arrow of time inherent in Quantum Mechanics is discussed.

arXiv:2202.04619EMS Press eBooksJun 29, 20225 citations

Time, decoherence, and ‘reversible’ measurements

Philip C. E. Stamp

Introduction In this chapter I attempt to review a few somewhat loosely connected themes, which figure in recent work by physicists on decoherence and irreversibility in quantum mechanics. The looseness is forced upon us by the subject – any proper discussion inevitably drags in questions about thermodynamic reversibility and the various arrows of time, about the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum measurement, about the nature of quantum coherence, and about the relationship between quantum and classical mechanics. There are inevitably many gaps in our understanding of these questions, both for the physicist and for the philosopher. Some philosophers may feel that the subject is too immature to be interesting to them – that it is not yet ripe for philosophical analysis. Indeed I have recently heard the opinion expressed that quantum mechanics in its entirety was still not amenable to such analysis – that if the physicists could not yet understand it, there was no point in philosophers trying! I hope this feeling is not too widespread amongst philosophers of science – I suspect that it may arise in part because the philosophical community (along with a good part of the scientific community) is unaware of some important advances that have been made in the last decade in understanding the physics of quantum processes at the macroscopic level, as well as the relation between classical and quantum mechanics. Much of the chapter is therefore unashamedly tutorial in nature; however, given the wide range of topics covered, I imagine that even physicists will find at least some of the material to be novel.

Cambridge University Press eBooksAug 24, 19956 citations

The Arrow of Time in Quantum Theory

J P Connerade

In Classical Mechanics, time is reversible, i.e. implies no particular choice: only the observer knows in which direction it flows. The present Comment re-examines whether this remains true in Quantum Mechanics. In the context of Atomic Physics, it is concluded that the existence of an arrow of time depends on the manner in which the radiation field is introduced, which must be non-perturbative.

AtomsOct 26, 20251 citation