Quantum mutual information is a measure of the correlation between subsystems of a joint quantum system. We exhibit a quantum cryptographic protocol that provides an operational meaning for quantum mutual information.
Alice and Bob share a correlated composite quantum system AB. If AB is used as the key for a one-time pad cryptographic system, we show that the maximum amount of information that Alice can send securely to Bob is the quantum mutual information of AB.
Mutual information is the reciprocal information that is common to or shared by two or more parties. Quantum mutual information (QMI) for bipartite quantum systems is non-negative, and bears the interpretation of total correlation between the two subsystems.This may, however, be no longer true for three or more party quantum systems. It is possible that three-party QMI can be negative. That QMI can assume negative value is confronting, and we give operational definition of QMI which is non-negative. We then define multiparty operational quantum discord, and give some examples. Interestingly, we observe that quantum discord increases when measurement is performed on larger number of subsystems. Consequently, the symmetric version of quantum discord, which involves measurement on all parties, reveals the maximal quantumness. This raises question on the interpretation of measured mutual information as classical correlation.
Mutual information is the reciprocal information that is common to or shared by two or more parties. Quantum mutual information for bipartite quantum systems is non-negative, and bears the interpretation of total correlation between the two subsystems. This may, however, no longer be true for three or more party quantum systems. In this paper, we propose an alternative definition of multipartite information, taking into account the shared information between two and more parties. It is non-negative, observes monotonicity under partial trace as well as completely positive maps, and equals the multipartite information measure in literature for pure states. We then define multiparty quantum discord, and give some examples. Interestingly, we observe that quantum discord increases when a measurement is performed on a large number of subsystems. Consequently, the symmetric quantum discord, which involves a measurement on all parties, reveals the maximal quantumness. This raises a question on the interpretation of measured mutual information as a classical correlation.
We postulate the existence of a universal uncertainty relation between the quantum and classical mutual informations between pairs of quantum systems. Specifically, we propose that the sum of the classical mutual information, determined by two mutually unbiased pairs of observables, never exceeds the quantum mutual information. We call this the complementary-quantum correlation (CQC) relation and prove its validity for pure states, for states with one maximally mixed subsystem, and for all states when one measurement is minimally disturbing. We provide results of a Monte Carlo simulation suggesting that the CQC relation is generally valid. Importantly, we also show that the CQC relation represents an improvement to an entropic uncertainty principle in the presence of a quantum memory, and that it can be used to verify an achievable secret key rate in the quantum one-time pad cryptographic protocol.
Within the framework of Information Theory, the existence of correlations between two random variables means that we can obtain information about one of them, just by measuring or observing the other random variable. In certain cases, this kind of relationship allows obtaining information about a variable even when the other is separated by a very large distance, that is, the process of obtaining information is non-local, an example (if not the only) is the quantum entanglement. These features of correlations make it interesting and important to study, classify and quantify them. The correlations are classified into classical correlations and quantum correlations, in addition they are quantified through the mutual information. Here we will present a natural way to define classical mutual information and then we will generalize it to the quantum case. Furthermore, every term in the definitions of mutual information will be interpreted using the concepts of classical and quantum entropy.
While the quantum mutual information is a fundamental measure of quantum information, it is only defined for spacelike-separated quantum systems. Such a limitation is not present in the theory of classical information, where the mutual information between two random variables is well-defined irrespective of whether or not the variables are separated in space or separated in time. Motivated by this disparity between the classical and quantum mutual information, we employ the pseudo-density matrix formalism to define a simple extension of quantum mutual information into the time domain. As in the spatial case, we show that such a notion of quantum mutual information in time serves as a natural measure of correlation between timelike-separated systems, while also highlighting ways in which quantum correlations distinguish between space and time. We also show how such quantum mutual information is time-symmetric with respect to quantum Bayesian inversion, and then we conclude by showing how mutual information in time yields a Holevo bound for the amount of classical information that may be extracted from sequential measurements on an ensemble of quantum states.