Lattice-based cryptography is one of the most active research topics in cryptography in recent years. In many cryptographic constructions based on lattice assumptions, the building block is a proof of knowledge of a solution to an instance of the Inhomogeneous Small Integer Solution (ISIS) problem. However, all known such proof \n \nsystems have relatively weak security guarantees: Breaking each of these protocols is potentially easier than solving the underlying instance of the ISIS problem. As a consequence, cryptographic constructions relying on these proof systems typically inherit the sub-optimal security guarantees. Therefore, proof systems with stronger security guarantees are highly desirable. Such protocols are not only interesting from a theoretical point of view, but they also lead to lattice-based cryptographic constructions relying on weaker hardness assumptions than the contemporary schemes. \n \n \n \nIn this thesis, we construct a series of zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge with strong security guarantees and reasonable communication costs, that can find various applications in lattice-based cryptography. Our constructions rely on a simple, yet versatile and effective technique, called Decomposition-Extension. When adapting this technique to the Stern-KTX proof system (Stern ‘96 - Kawachi, Tanaka, Xagawa ‘08), we obtain a zero-knowledge proof of knowledge for the ISIS problem (in the infinity norm) with a very strong security guarantee: Breaking the protocol is as least as hard as solving the underlying ISIS instance. We then develop our technique to design the following lattice-based cryptographic constructions: \n \n \n \n- Efficient zero-knowledge proofs of plaintext knowledge with strong security guarantees \n \nfor 4 encryption schemes based on the Learning with Errors problem: Regev’s scheme (Regev ‘05); the Dual-Regev scheme (Gentry, Peikert, Vaikuntanathan ‘08); the PVW scheme (Peikert, Vaikuntanathan, Waters ‘08); and the GHV scheme (Gentry, Halevi, Vaikuntanathan ‘10). Our results immediately yield 4 lattice-based interactive encryption protocols that are secure under chosen ciphertext attacks. Previously, only zero-knowledge proofs of plaintext knowledge for Regev’s scheme were known, and they are relatively inefficient with rather weak security guarantees. \n \n \n \n- A lattice-based identity-based identification scheme relying on a weaker hardness assumption than in the previous works. Furthermore, we introduce an identity-based ring identification scheme based on the worst-case hardness of lattice problems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such scheme. \n \n \n \n- An improved lattice-based group signature scheme relying on relatively weak hardness assumptions, in which the signature size is logarithmic in the number of group users. Earlier lattice-based group signature schemes, which were published before 2013, rely on relatively weak hardness assumptions but have the undesirable property that the size of the signature is linear in the number of group users. A recent scheme (Laguillaumie, Langlois, Libert, Stehlé ‘13) achieves logarithmic signature size but it has to rely on relatively strong hardness assumptions. Our construction, thus, simultaneously achieves the good features of the existing schemes.
Lattice-based cryptography is one of the most active research topics in cryptography in recent years. In many cryptographic constructions based on lattice assumptions, the building block is a proof of knowledge of a solution to an instance of the Inhomogeneous Small Integer Solution (ISIS) problem. However, all known such proof \n \nsystems have relatively weak security guarantees: Breaking each of these protocols is potentially easier than solving the underlying instance of the ISIS problem. As a consequence, cryptographic constructions relying on these proof systems typically inherit the sub-optimal security guarantees. Therefore, proof systems with stronger security guarantees are highly desirable. Such protocols are not only interesting from a theoretical point of view, but they also lead to lattice-based cryptographic constructions relying on weaker hardness assumptions than the contemporary schemes. \n \n \n \nIn this thesis, we construct a series of zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge with strong security guarantees and reasonable communication costs, that can find various applications in lattice-based cryptography. Our constructions rely on a simple, yet versatile and effective technique, called Decomposition-Extension. When adapting this technique to the Stern-KTX proof system (Stern ‘96 - Kawachi, Tanaka, Xagawa ‘08), we obtain a zero-knowledge proof of knowledge for the ISIS problem (in the infinity norm) with a very strong security guarantee: Breaking the protocol is as least as hard as solving the underlying ISIS instance. We then develop our technique to design the following lattice-based cryptographic constructions: \n \n \n \n- Efficient zero-knowledge proofs of plaintext knowledge with strong security guarantees \n \nfor 4 encryption schemes based on the Learning with Errors problem: Regev’s scheme (Regev ‘05); the Dual-Regev scheme (Gentry, Peikert, Vaikuntanathan ‘08); the PVW scheme (Peikert, Vaikuntanathan, Waters ‘08); and the GHV scheme (Gentry, Halevi, Vaikuntanathan ‘10). Our results immediately yield 4 lattice-based interactive encryption protocols that are secure under chosen ciphertext attacks. Previously, only zero-knowledge proofs of plaintext knowledge for Regev’s scheme were known, and they are relatively inefficient with rather weak security guarantees. \n \n \n \n- A lattice-based identity-based identification scheme relying on a weaker hardness assumption than in the previous works. Furthermore, we introduce an identity-based ring identification scheme based on the worst-case hardness of lattice problems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such scheme. \n \n \n \n- An improved lattice-based group signature scheme relying on relatively weak hardness assumptions, in which the signature size is logarithmic in the number of group users. Earlier lattice-based group signature schemes, which were published before 2013, rely on relatively weak hardness assumptions but have the undesirable property that the size of the signature is linear in the number of group users. A recent scheme (Laguillaumie, Langlois, Libert, Stehlé ‘13) achieves logarithmic signature size but it has to rely on relatively strong hardness assumptions. Our construction, thus, simultaneously achieves the good features of the existing schemes.
Abstract. In all existing efficient proofs of knowledge of a solution to the infinity norm Inhomogeneous Small Integer Solution (ISIS ∞ ) problem, the knowledge extractor outputs a solution vector that is only guaranteed to be Õ(n) times longer than the witness possessed by the prover. As a consequence, in many cryptographic schemes that use these proof systems as building blocks, there exists a gap between the hardness of solving the underlying ISIS ∞ problem and the hardness underlying the security reductions. In this paper, we generalize Stern’s protocol to obtain two statistical zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge for the ISIS ∞ problem that remove this gap. Our result yields the potential of relying on weaker security assumptions for various lattice-based cryptographic constructions. As applications of our proof system, we introduce a concurrently secure identity-based identification scheme based on the worst-case hardness of the SIVPÕ(n1.5) problem (in the ℓ2 norm) in general lattices in the random oracle model, and an efficient statistical zero-knowledge proof of plaintext knowledge with small constant gap factor for Regev’s encryption scheme.
Lattice-based cryptography is a branch of cryptography exploiting the presumed hardness of some well-known problems on lattices. Its main advantages are its simplicity, efficiency, and apparent security against quantum computers. The principle of the security proofs in lattice-based cryptography is to show that attacking a given scheme is at least as hard as solving a particular problem, as the Learning with Errors problem (LWE) or the Small Integer Solution problem (SIS). Then, by showing that those two problems are at least as hard to solve than a hard problem on lattices, presumed polynomial time intractable, we conclude that the constructed scheme is secure.In this thesis, we improve the foundation of the security proofs and build new cryptographic schemes. We study the hardness of the SIS and LWE problems, and of some of their variants on integer rings of cyclotomic fields and on modules on those rings. We show that there is a classical hardness proof for the LWE problem (Regev's prior reduction was quantum), and that the module variants of SIS and LWE are also hard to solve. We also give two new lattice-based group signature schemes, with security based on SIS and LWE. One is the first lattice-based group signature with logarithmic signature size in the number of users. And the other construction allows another functionality, verifier-local revocation. Finally, we improve the size of some parameters in the work on cryptographic multilinear maps of Garg, Gentry and Halevi in 2013.
Building cryptographic schemes upon as many fundamentally different hard problems as possible, seems to be the best way to hedge against future threats such as quantum computers. Being mainly based on the hardness of factoring and computing discrete logarithms, the present security landscape is at risk. In contrast, problems in lattices, such as finding short non-zero vectors, seem to withstand quantum computer attacks and the best known algorithms run in exponential time. In sharp contrast to other fields of cryptography, lattices admit a worst-case to average-case reduction (Ajtai 1996). Instead of assuming that a problem is hard for randomly chosen instances, lattice-based cryptosystems merely require the existence of a single hard instance, i.e., hardness in the worst case. With such an additional "trust anchor", the resulting security guarantees are much more plausible. Quite recently, we have seen an increased interest in lattice-based cryptography with many striking results. In this thesis, we are particularly interested in signature schemes, which provide a supporting pillar for today's economy. While we have seen basic signature schemes from lattices, e.g., (Gentry, Peikert, Vaikuntanathan 2008), (Lyubashevsky, Micciancio 2008), (Lyubashevsky 2009), or (Cash, Hofheinz, Kiltz, Peikert 2009), there are hardly any results dealing with the specific needs of applications, where ordinary signatures often fall too short. In this thesis, we build upon the above results and equip them with additional features, motivated by an exemplary selection of application scenarios. Hence, we demonstrate the great versatility of lattices in cryptography. In particular, we facilitate privacy-friendly electronic elections, fair online contract signing, signature compression, secure signatures in the strongest sense, as well as identity-based primitives. As far as possible, we avoid simplifying assumptions, such as the random oracle model. We believe that our techniques can be transferred to other application scenarios as well. Independently of the these results, we discuss the practical hardness of lattice problems and provide a framework for estimating the security of essentially all modern lattice-based cryptography.
One essential quest in cryptography is the search for hard instances of a given computational problem that is known to be hard in the worst-case. In lattice cryptography we are in the unique situation that we have found a way of picking random instances which are at least as hard as well-studied lattice problems in the worst-case. At the same time, no attack running in subexponential time is known to break these problems, even for an adversary using quantum computers. Virtually all public-key schemes in use today are subject to such attacks, and the development of quantum computers is actively pursued, so it is prudent to investigate lattice-based alternatives. There are two fundamental open problems in lattice cryptography today and this thesis contributes to solving them. First, there exists a widely used efficiency improvement that allows for trapdoors whose asymptotic keysize and evaluation time are both quasilinear in the dimension of an associated lattice. This is accomplished by restricting oneself to lattices with special structure, so-called ideal lattices. This entails the use of newer security assumptions, but these have not been analyzed thoroughly so far. We start this work by comparing the class of ideal lattice problems with its general counterpart in terms of size. Affirming folklore, we find the number of restricted instances among all instances to be asymptotically negligible for those classes of lattices suggested for practical use. The second open problem is that while the connection to worst-case problems is well understood, the practical hardness of the related average-case problems is not. Specifically, there have been parameters suggested for practical usage, where current lattice basis reduction algorithms can solve these worst-case problems, but the related average-case problems, which these are reduced to and which represent the basis of practical security of the cryptosystems, are completely infeasible. In most cases, this lack of understanding has lead either to a very conservative choice of parameters, or none at all. This in turn makes it impossible for the resulting lattice schemes to compete with their counterparts based on other paradigms. We further the understanding of this practical security and at the same time improve the efficiency of several common related cryptographic schemes. Among other things, we find that for the SWIFFT compression function, solving certain problems closely related to finding collisions is easier than previously thought and we suggest efficient replacement parameters. We propose a novel zero-knowledge identification scheme that, to our knowledge, beats all competing post-quantum schemes, even those based on other paradigms. Possibly most important, we help to tighten the efficiency gap between lattice encryption schemes that are provably secure and the acclaimed ad-hoc encryption scheme NTRU. This is done by unifying many recent developments into a new provably secure design and providing a comprehensive analysis of practical security, which together results in a great leap of efficiency.
Abstract. We present a variant of Regev’s cryptosystem first presented in [Reg05], but with a new choice of parameters. By a recent classical re-duction by Peikert we prove the scheme semantically secure based on the worst-case lattice problem GapSVP. From this we construct a threshold cryptosystem which has a very efficient and non-interactive decryption protocol. We prove the threshold cryptosystem secure against passive adversaries corrupting all but one of the players, and againts active ad-versaries corrupting less than one third of the players. We also describe how one can build a distributed key generation protocol. In the final part of the paper we show how one can, in zero-knowledge- prove knowledge of the plaintext contained in a given ciphertext from Regev’s original cryptosystem or our variant. The proof is of size only a constant times the size of the public key. 1
Since its proposal by Regev in 2005, the Learning With Errors (LWE) problem was used as the underlying problem for a great variety of schemes. Its applications are many-fold, reaching from basic and highly practical primitives like key exchange, public-key encryption, and signature schemes to very advanced solutions like fully homomorphic encryption, group signatures, and identity based encryption. One of the underlying reasons for this fertility is the flexibility with that LWE can be instantiated. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: It makes selecting parameters for cryptographic applications complicated. When selecting parameters for a new LWE-based primitive, a researcher has to take the influence of several parameters on the efficiency of the scheme and the runtime of a variety of attacks into consideration. In fact, the missing trust in the concrete hardness of LWE is one of the main problems to overcome to bring LWE-based schemes to practice. This thesis aims at closing the gap between the theoretical knowledge of the hardness of LWE, and the concrete problem of selecting parameters for an LWE-based scheme. To this end, we analyze the existing methods to estimate the hardness of LWE, and introduce new estimation techniques where necessary. Afterwards, we show how to transfer this knowledge into instantiations that are at the same time secure and efficient. We show this process on three examples: - A highly optimized public-key encryption scheme for embedded devices that is based on a variant of Ring-LWE. - A practical signature scheme that served as the foundation of one of the best lattice-based signature schemes based on standard lattices. - An advanced public-key encryption scheme that enjoys the unique property of natural double hardness based on LWE instances similar to those used for fully homomorphic encryption.