Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Studies in Applied Mathematics

On Error Estimation in Quantum Statistics Perturbation Theory

William A. Janos

Published Apr 1, 1962• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1002/sapm1962411246

Related papers

Theorems on Estimating Perturbative Coefficients in Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Physics

Mark A. Samuel, Stephen D. Druger

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Statistical Methods in Quantum Theory

R. J. CLARK, William Harold Watson

Nature•Jul 7, 1928•0 citations

Efficient estimation of perturbative error with cellular automata

Yudong Cao, Sabre Kais

From celestial mechanics to quantum theory of atoms and molecules, perturbation theory has played a central role in natural sciences. Particularly in quantum mechanics, the amount of information needed for specifying the state of a many-body system commonly scales exponentially as the system size. This poses a fundamental difficulty in using perturbation theory at arbitrary order. As one computes the terms in the perturbation series at increasingly higher orders, it is often important to determine whether the series converges and if so, what is an accurate estimation of the total error that comes from the next order of perturbation up to infinity. Here we present a set of efficient algorithms that compute tight upper bounds to perturbation terms at arbitrary order. We argue that these tight bounds often take the form of symmetric polynomials on the parameter of the quantum system. We then use cellular automata as our basic model of computation to compute the symmetric polynomials that account for all of the virtual transitions at any given order. At any fixed order, the computational cost of our algorithm scales polynomially as a function of the system size. We present a non-trivial example which shows that our error estimation is nearly tight with respect to exact calculation.

arXiv:1607.01374•Jul 5, 2016•2 citations

Quantum Statistical Mechanics by Perturbation Resummation Methods

C. De Dominicis

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1968•0 citations

Sensitivity of quantum PageRank

Hirotada Honda

In this paper, we discuss the sensitivity of quantum PageRank. By using the finite dimensional perturbation theory, we estimate the change of the quantum PageRank under a small analytical perturbation on the Google matrix. In addition, we will show the way to estimate the lower bound of the convergence radius as well as the error bound of the finite sum in the expansion of the perturbed PageRank.

arXiv:1907.01641•Jun 27, 2019•0 citations

Operator Method for Quantum Statistics

И. Д. Феранчук, A. A. Ivanov, Van-Hoang Le +1 more

Lecture notes in physics•Nov 9, 2014•0 citations
From celestial mechanics to quantum theory of atoms and molecules, perturbation theory has played a central role in natural sciences. Particularly in quantum mechanics, the amount of information needed for specifying the state of a many-body system commonly scales exponentially as the system size. This poses a fundamental difficulty in using perturbation theory at arbitrary order. As one computes the terms in the perturbation series at increasingly higher orders, it is often important to determine whether the series converges and if so, what is an accurate estimation of the total error that comes from the next order of perturbation up to infinity. Here we present a set of efficient algorithms that compute tight upper bounds to perturbation terms at arbitrary order. We argue that these tight bounds often take the form of symmetric polynomials on the parameter of the quantum system. We then use cellular automata as our basic model of computation to compute the symmetric polynomials that account for all of the virtual transitions at any given order. At any fixed order, the computational cost of our algorithm scales polynomially as a function of the system size. We present a non-trivial example which shows that our error estimation is nearly tight with respect to exact calculation.