Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Philosophical Quarterly

Interpreting Quantum Mechanics

Gerrit J. Smith

Published Jan 1, 1977• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5840/ipq197717326

Related papers

Coexistence of several interpretations of quantum mechanics and the fruitfulness of scientific works

Thomas Boyer‐Kassem

The coexistence of several interpretations of one theory is considered through the example of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The problem considered is whether physicists manage to work properly in spite of the several interpretations. The criterion adopted is the possibility of re-using others ’ works for another research: this is called “fruitfulness of works”. It is argued that such a fruitfulness is possible between works made in different quantum interpretations. Quantum interpretations in conflict Quantum mechanics (QM) is famous nowadays for having several interpretations. Here are some quotations which illustrate some oppositions: People who have not grasped the ideas of [Bohm’s] papers [...] are handicapped in any discussion of the meaning of quantum mechanics. (Bell, 1987, p. 173) The quantum theory of parallel universes [...] is the explanation — the only one that is tenable.

•Jun 18, 2009•0 citations

Interpreting Quantum Mechanics

J. G. Cramer

Science•Jul 1, 1983•7 citations

Interpreting Quantum Mechanics in a Realist Fashion

W. M. Stuckey, Michael Silberstein, Timothy J. McDevitt

Abstract In Sub-Chapter 9A we explain what makes an interpretation of QM realist and how our interpretation of QM is realist and psi-epistemic. We contrast this with relational quantum mechanics. What is fundamental in our interpretation is 4D quantum–classical contextuality as given by “all-at-once” AGCs.

•Jul 26, 2024•0 citations

Interpreting quantum mechanics

Michael E. Cuffaro

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2021•0 citations

Interpreting quantum mechanics

Michael Janas, Michael E. Cuffaro, Michel Janssen B

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Dec 3, 2021•0 citations

Circumveiloped by Obscuritads. The nature of interpretation in quantum mechanics, hermeneutic circles and physical reality, with cameos

Jacques Derrida, Frederik Müller

Summary. The quest for finding the right interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is as old als QM and still has not ended, and may never end. The question what an interpretation of QM is has hardly ever been raised explicitly, let alone answered. We raise it and answer it. Then the quest for the right interpretation can continue self-consciously, for we then know exactly what we are after. We present a list of minimal requirements that something has to meet in order to qualify as an interpretation of QM. We also raise, as a side issue, the question how the discourse on the interpretation of QM relates to hermeneutics in Continental Philosophy.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
The coexistence of several interpretations of one theory is considered through the example of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The problem considered is whether physicists manage to work properly in spite of the several interpretations. The criterion adopted is the possibility of re-using others ’ works for another research: this is called “fruitfulness of works”. It is argued that such a fruitfulness is possible between works made in different quantum interpretations. Quantum interpretations in conflict Quantum mechanics (QM) is famous nowadays for having several interpretations. Here are some quotations which illustrate some oppositions: People who have not grasped the ideas of [Bohm’s] papers [...] are handicapped in any discussion of the meaning of quantum mechanics. (Bell, 1987, p. 173) The quantum theory of parallel universes [...] is the explanation — the only one that is tenable.
Summary. The quest for finding the right interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is as old als QM and still has not ended, and may never end. The question what an interpretation of QM is has hardly ever been raised explicitly, let alone answered. We raise it and answer it. Then the quest for the right interpretation can continue self-consciously, for we then know exactly what we are after. We present a list of minimal requirements that something has to meet in order to qualify as an interpretation of QM. We also raise, as a side issue, the question how the discourse on the interpretation of QM relates to hermeneutics in Continental Philosophy.