Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae

An algebraic approach to quantum mechanics II

Istvan Montvay

Published Oct 1, 1966• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf03157463

Related papers

An algebraic approach to quantum mechanics

Istvan Montvay

Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields•Apr 1, 1966•5 citations

Algebraic quantum mechanics: II. S-matrix

В.В. Варламов

The 𝑆-matrix is defined in the framework of an algebraic formulation ofquantum theory with a binary structure.

Matematičeskie struktury i modelirovanie•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

New Algebraic Representations of Quantum Mechanics

Shun-Jin Wang

Contrary to the usual view that quantum mechanics in configuration space has, in general, only one algebaic representation( the Heisenberg algebraic representation), we have proved that quantum mechanics in configuration space has, in general, alternative algebraic representations: (i) In a finite domain of configuration space, it can be expressed in terms of su(2) algebra; (ii) in an infinite domain of configuration space, it can be expressed in terms of su(l,l) algebra.The above results open a new possibility to reformulate quantum mechanics and provide more mathematical tools to solve diverse physical problems.Nonlinear relations of different Lie algebas may imply a unification of Lie algebras and their physical implications ( the quantum motion modes ) in a deeper nonlinear domain.This observation raises challenging mathematical and physical questions.

•Aug 1, 1990•0 citations

Review of the algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics

Antonino Drago

Pisa University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Does the Wave-Function of the Universe Exist?

Thomas Krüger

The overwhelming majority of scientists still takes it for granted that classical mechanics (ClM) is nothing but a limiting case of quantum mechanics (QM). Although some physicists restrict this belief to a generalized QM as represented, e. g., by the algebra of observables, it will be shown in this contribution that the view of ClM as a mere sub-set of QM is nevertheless unfounded. The usual attempts to derive the laws of ClM from QM are either insufficient or not universally applicable. The transition from traditional to algebraic QM does not add any further insight. It is demonstrated that typical constituents of the classical macroscopic world i) cannot be described reasonably in terms of QM and/or ii) do not show up the typical quantum behavior which manifests in the double-slit interference and in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations. Moreover, both attempts to recover ClM from QM and approaches based on vacuum fluctuations are critically inspected, and we arrive at the conclusion: QM does not comprehend ClM, i. e., a wavefunction of the universe does not exist.

arXiv:quant-ph/0404044•Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2006•1 citation

ALGEBRAIC QUANTUM MECHANICS: III. QUESTIONS OF INTERPRETATION

В. В. Варламов

Matematičeskie struktury i modelirovanie•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations
Contrary to the usual view that quantum mechanics in configuration space has, in general, only one algebaic representation( the Heisenberg algebraic representation), we have proved that quantum mechanics in configuration space has, in general, alternative algebraic representations: (i) In a finite domain of configuration space, it can be expressed in terms of su(2) algebra; (ii) in an infinite domain of configuration space, it can be expressed in terms of su(l,l) algebra.The above results open a new possibility to reformulate quantum mechanics and provide more mathematical tools to solve diverse physical problems.Nonlinear relations of different Lie algebas may imply a unification of Lie algebras and their physical implications ( the quantum motion modes ) in a deeper nonlinear domain.This observation raises challenging mathematical and physical questions.
The overwhelming majority of scientists still takes it for granted that classical mechanics (ClM) is nothing but a limiting case of quantum mechanics (QM). Although some physicists restrict this belief to a generalized QM as represented, e. g., by the algebra of observables, it will be shown in this contribution that the view of ClM as a mere sub-set of QM is nevertheless unfounded. The usual attempts to derive the laws of ClM from QM are either insufficient or not universally applicable. The transition from traditional to algebraic QM does not add any further insight. It is demonstrated that typical constituents of the classical macroscopic world i) cannot be described reasonably in terms of QM and/or ii) do not show up the typical quantum behavior which manifests in the double-slit interference and in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations. Moreover, both attempts to recover ClM from QM and approaches based on vacuum fluctuations are critically inspected, and we arrive at the conclusion: QM does not comprehend ClM, i. e., a wavefunction of the universe does not exist.