Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities"

Anupam Garg, N. David Mermin

Published Jul 19, 1982• 17 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.49.242

Related papers

Hidden Variables and Bell’s Inequalities

Jean-Louis Basdevant, Jean Dalibard

Advanced texts in physics•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities

Arthur I. Fine

It is shown that the following statements about a quantum correlation experiment are mutually equivalent. (1) There is a deterministic hidden-variables model for the experiment. (2) There is a factorizable, stochastic model. (3) There is one joint distribution for all observables of the experiment, returning the experimental probabilities. (4) There are well-defined, compatible joint distributions for all pairs and triples of commuting and noncommuting observables. (5) The Bell inequalities hold.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 1, 1982•1,181 citations

New Bell-type inequalities for N > 4 necessary for existence of a hidden variable

Patrick Suppes, Mario Zanotti

INTRODUCTION Fine (1982) proved that Bell's (1964) inequalities are sufficient, as well as necessary, to guarantee the existence of a joint probability distribution of the random variables in question, e.g., those representing certain spin correlation experiments. Garg and Mermin (1982) gave an example of eight random variables satisfying Bell's inequalities but such that no joint distribution exists. The purpose of this paper is to extend Bell's inequalities to obtain some general necessary conditions for the existence of a joint probability distribution for any finite collection of Bell-type random variables. Our results show that, for N > 4, many new elementary inequalities beyond those of Bell must be satisfied by any hidden-variable theory. Since these additional inequalities are violated by quantum mechanical predictions for appropriate choice of measurement arrangements, they serve to increase the conceptual distance between what may be called Einstein locality, after the EPR paradox, and quantum mechanics. To give a concrete sense of the nature of our results, we exhibit one of the new inequalities violated by Garg and Mermin's example. For theoretical purposes it will suffice to introduce Bell-type random variables X 1 ,…, X N , N ≥ 4, having possible values ±1, with means E ( X i ) = 0 and with what we term Bell covariances E ( X i X j ) relative to the index i 0 , with 1 ≤ i ≤ i 0 , N , 2 ≤ i 0 N – 2. Notice that, when N = 4, we must, as is familiar, have i 0 = 2.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 13, 1996•0 citations

On the significance of Bell's inequality for hidden-variable theories

Willy De Baere

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Mar 1, 1984•42 citations

On the existence of a local quasi hidden variable (LqHV) model for eachN-qudit state and the maximal quantum violation of Bell inequalities

Elena R. Loubenets

We specify the local quasi hidden variable (LqHV) model reproducing the probabilistic description of all N-partite joint von Neumann measurements on an N-qudit state. Via this local probability model, we derive a new upper bound on the maximal violation by an N-qudit state of Bell inequalities of any type (either on correlation functions or on joint probabilities) for [Formula: see text] observables per site. This new upper bound not only improves for all [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] and d the corresponding results available for general Bell inequalities in the literature but also, for the N-qubit case with two observables per site, reduces exactly to the attainable upper bound known for quantum violations of correlation [Formula: see text] setting Bell inequalities in a dichotomic case.

arXiv:1602.04645•International Journal of Quantum Information•May 19, 2016•7 citations

On hidden-variable theories and Bell's inequality

Luis de la Peña, Ana Marı́a Cetto, Thomas A. Brody

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Sep 1, 1972•69 citations
It is shown that the following statements about a quantum correlation experiment are mutually equivalent. (1) There is a deterministic hidden-variables model for the experiment. (2) There is a factorizable, stochastic model. (3) There is one joint distribution for all observables of the experiment, returning the experimental probabilities. (4) There are well-defined, compatible joint distributions for all pairs and triples of commuting and noncommuting observables. (5) The Bell inequalities hold.
INTRODUCTION Fine (1982) proved that Bell's (1964) inequalities are sufficient, as well as necessary, to guarantee the existence of a joint probability distribution of the random variables in question, e.g., those representing certain spin correlation experiments. Garg and Mermin (1982) gave an example of eight random variables satisfying Bell's inequalities but such that no joint distribution exists. The purpose of this paper is to extend Bell's inequalities to obtain some general necessary conditions for the existence of a joint probability distribution for any finite collection of Bell-type random variables. Our results show that, for N > 4, many new elementary inequalities beyond those of Bell must be satisfied by any hidden-variable theory. Since these additional inequalities are violated by quantum mechanical predictions for appropriate choice of measurement arrangements, they serve to increase the conceptual distance between what may be called Einstein locality, after the EPR paradox, and quantum mechanics. To give a concrete sense of the nature of our results, we exhibit one of the new inequalities violated by Garg and Mermin's example. For theoretical purposes it will suffice to introduce Bell-type random variables X 1 ,…, X N , N ≥ 4, having possible values ±1, with means E ( X i ) = 0 and with what we term Bell covariances E ( X i X j ) relative to the index i 0 , with 1 ≤ i ≤ i 0 , N , 2 ≤ i 0 N – 2. Notice that, when N = 4, we must, as is familiar, have i 0 = 2.
We specify the local quasi hidden variable (LqHV) model reproducing the probabilistic description of all N-partite joint von Neumann measurements on an N-qudit state. Via this local probability model, we derive a new upper bound on the maximal violation by an N-qudit state of Bell inequalities of any type (either on correlation functions or on joint probabilities) for [Formula: see text] observables per site. This new upper bound not only improves for all [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] and d the corresponding results available for general Bell inequalities in the literature but also, for the N-qubit case with two observables per site, reduces exactly to the attainable upper bound known for quantum violations of correlation [Formula: see text] setting Bell inequalities in a dichotomic case.