Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Universal role of quantum uncertainty in Anderson metal–insulator transition

W. W. Cheng, Z.J. Zhang, Longyan Gong, Shengmei Zhao

Published Apr 3, 2016• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.aop.2016.03.015

Related papers

Universal critical conductivity in the metal to Anderson insulator transition in the two dimensional Anderson-Hubbard model

Prabuddha Chakraborty, Krzysztof Byczuk, D. Vollhardt

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 18, 2010•0 citations

The Anderson metal-insulator transition in a quantum-chaotic system of laser-cooled atoms

Jean Claude Garreau

•Nov 13, 2009•0 citations

The Mott Anderson metal insulator transition in n orbital models

R. Oppermann

The European Physical Journal B•Dec 1, 1983•14 citations

Quantum discord near Anderson metal–insulator transition with correlated disorder

W. W. Cheng, Jiaxin Li, Chuan-Jia Shan +2 more

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Dec 17, 2013•5 citations

Quantum fluctuations at metal-insulator transitions of doped systems

D. Gandolfo, N. S. Tonchev, André F. Verbeure +1 more

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jun 1, 1996•1 citation

Half metals at intermediate energy scales in Anderson-type insulators

Kyung-Yong Park, Hyunjung Lee, Ki‐Seok Kim

Although quantum phase transitions involved with Anderson localization have been investigated for more than a half century, the role of spin polarization in these metal-insulator transitions has not been clearly addressed as a function of both the range of interactions and the range of energy scales. Based on the Anderson-Hartree-Fock study, we reveal that the spin polarization has nothing to do with Anderson metal-insulator transitions in three dimensions as long as effective interactions between electrons are long-ranged Coulomb type. On the other hand, we find that metal-insulator transitions appear with magnetism in the case of Hubbard-type local interactions. In particular, we show that the multifractal spectrum of spin-$\ensuremath{\uparrow}$ electrons differs from that of spin-$\ensuremath{\downarrow}$ electrons at the high-energy mobility edge, which indicates the existence of spin-dependent universality classes for metal-insulator transitions. One of the most fascinating and rather unexpected results is the appearance of half metals at intermediate energy scales above the high-energy mobility edge in Anderson-type insulators of the Fermi energy; that is, only spin-$\ensuremath{\uparrow}$ electrons are delocalized, while spin-$\ensuremath{\downarrow}$ electrons are Anderson type localized.

arXiv:2010.14001•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Aug 16, 2021•0 citations
Although quantum phase transitions involved with Anderson localization have been investigated for more than a half century, the role of spin polarization in these metal-insulator transitions has not been clearly addressed as a function of both the range of interactions and the range of energy scales. Based on the Anderson-Hartree-Fock study, we reveal that the spin polarization has nothing to do with Anderson metal-insulator transitions in three dimensions as long as effective interactions between electrons are long-ranged Coulomb type. On the other hand, we find that metal-insulator transitions appear with magnetism in the case of Hubbard-type local interactions. In particular, we show that the multifractal spectrum of spin-$\ensuremath{\uparrow}$ electrons differs from that of spin-$\ensuremath{\downarrow}$ electrons at the high-energy mobility edge, which indicates the existence of spin-dependent universality classes for metal-insulator transitions. One of the most fascinating and rather unexpected results is the appearance of half metals at intermediate energy scales above the high-energy mobility edge in Anderson-type insulators of the Fermi energy; that is, only spin-$\ensuremath{\uparrow}$ electrons are delocalized, while spin-$\ensuremath{\downarrow}$ electrons are Anderson type localized.