Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of the Korean Physical Society

Quantum Mechanics on S1, S2 and Lorentz Group

HyunCheol Song, Sang Gyu Jo

Published Dec 15, 2011• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.3938/jkps.59.3314

Related papers

The representations of the Lorentz group in quantum mechanics

J. M. Jauch, Christian Frønsdal, H.A. Tolhoek +1 more

•Jan 1, 1959•1 citation

Demonstration and resolution of the Gibbs paradox of the first kind

Hjalmar Peters

The Gibbs paradox of the first kind (GP1) refers to the false increase in entropy which, in statistical mechanics, is calculated from the process of combining two gas systems S1 and S2 consisting of distinguishable particles. Presented in a somewhat modified form, the GP1 manifests as a contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Contrary to popular belief, this contradiction affects not only classical but also quantum statistical mechanics. This paper resolves the GP1 by considering two effects. (i) The uncertainty about which particles are located in S1 and which in S2 contributes to the entropies of S1 and S2. (ii) S1 and S2 are correlated by the fact that if a certain particle is located in one system, it cannot be located in the other. As a consequence, the entropy of the total system consisting of S1 and S2 is not the sum of the entropies of S1 and S2.

arXiv:1306.4638•European Journal of Physics•Dec 17, 2013•6 citations

Demonstration and resolution of the Gibbs paradox of the first kind

Hjalmar Peters

Abstract. The Gibbs paradox of the first kind (GP1) refers to the false increase in entropy which, in statistical mechanics, is calculated from the process of combining two gas systems S1 and S2 consisting of distinguishable particles. Presented in a somewhat modified form, the GP1 manifests as a contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Contrary to popular belief, this contradiction affects not only classical but also quantum statistical mechanics. The present paper resolves the GP1 by considering two effects: 1. The uncertainty about which particles are located in S1 and which in S2 contributes to the entropies of S1 and S2. 2. S1 and S2 are correlated by the fact that if a certain particle is located in one system, it cannot be located in the other. As a consequence, the entropy of the total system consisting of S1 and S2 is not the sum of the entropies of S1 and S2.

•Aug 17, 2016•8 citations

Quantum mechanics on the Heisenberg group

Ovidiu L. Calin, Der‐Chen Chang, Peter Charles Greiner

AMS/IP studies in advanced mathematics•Jun 12, 2008•0 citations

q-Quantum Mechanics on S 1

Reidun Twarock

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Quantum-classical phase transition of the escape rate of two interacting large spins

S. A. Owerre, Manu B. Paranjape

The Hamiltonian of a two-sublattice antiferromagnetic spins, with single (hard-axis) and double ion anisotropies described by $H=J \bold{\hat{S}}_{1}\cdot\bold{\hat{S}}_{2} - 2J_{z}\hat{S}_{1z}\hat{S}_{2z}+K(\hat{S}_{1z}^2 +\hat{S}_{2z}^2)$ is investigated using the method of effective potential. The problem is mapped to a single particle quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian in terms of the relative coordinate and reduced mass. We study the quantum-classical phase transition of the escape rate of this model. We show that the first-order phase transition for this model sets in at the critical value $J_c=\frac{K+J_z}{2}$ while for the anisotropic Heisenberg coupling $H = J(S_{1x}S_{2x} +S_{1y}S_{2y}) + J_zS_{1z}S_{2z} + K(S_{1z}^2+ S_{2z}^2)$ we obtain $J_c=\frac{2K-J_z}{3}$ . The phase diagrams of the transition are also studied.

arXiv:1308.4395•Aug 20, 2013•0 citations
The Gibbs paradox of the first kind (GP1) refers to the false increase in entropy which, in statistical mechanics, is calculated from the process of combining two gas systems S1 and S2 consisting of distinguishable particles. Presented in a somewhat modified form, the GP1 manifests as a contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Contrary to popular belief, this contradiction affects not only classical but also quantum statistical mechanics. This paper resolves the GP1 by considering two effects. (i) The uncertainty about which particles are located in S1 and which in S2 contributes to the entropies of S1 and S2. (ii) S1 and S2 are correlated by the fact that if a certain particle is located in one system, it cannot be located in the other. As a consequence, the entropy of the total system consisting of S1 and S2 is not the sum of the entropies of S1 and S2.
Abstract. The Gibbs paradox of the first kind (GP1) refers to the false increase in entropy which, in statistical mechanics, is calculated from the process of combining two gas systems S1 and S2 consisting of distinguishable particles. Presented in a somewhat modified form, the GP1 manifests as a contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics. Contrary to popular belief, this contradiction affects not only classical but also quantum statistical mechanics. The present paper resolves the GP1 by considering two effects: 1. The uncertainty about which particles are located in S1 and which in S2 contributes to the entropies of S1 and S2. 2. S1 and S2 are correlated by the fact that if a certain particle is located in one system, it cannot be located in the other. As a consequence, the entropy of the total system consisting of S1 and S2 is not the sum of the entropies of S1 and S2.
The Hamiltonian of a two-sublattice antiferromagnetic spins, with single (hard-axis) and double ion anisotropies described by H=JS^1⋅S^2−2JzS^1zS^2z+K(S^1z2+S^2z2)H=J \bold{\hat{S}}_{1}\cdot\bold{\hat{S}}_{2} - 2J_{z}\hat{S}_{1z}\hat{S}_{2z}+K(\hat{S}_{1z}^2 +\hat{S}_{2z}^2)H=JS^1​⋅S^2​−2Jz​S^1z​S^2z​+K(S^1z2​+S^2z2​) is investigated using the method of effective potential. The problem is mapped to a single particle quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian in terms of the relative coordinate and reduced mass. We study the quantum-classical phase transition of the escape rate of this model. We show that the first-order phase transition for this model sets in at the critical value Jc=K+Jz2J_c=\frac{K+J_z}{2}Jc​=2K+Jz​​ while for the anisotropic Heisenberg coupling H=J(S1xS2x+S1yS2y)+JzS1zS2z+K(S1z2+S2z2)H = J(S_{1x}S_{2x} +S_{1y}S_{2y}) + J_zS_{1z}S_{2z} + K(S_{1z}^2+ S_{2z}^2)H=J(S1x​S2x​+S1y​S2y​)+Jz​S1z​S2z​+K(S1z2​+S2z2​) we obtain Jc=2K−Jz3J_c=\frac{2K-J_z}{3}Jc​=32K−Jz​​ . The phase diagrams of the transition are also studied.