Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Monist

Identity, Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense

Nick Huggett

Published Jan 1, 1997• 50 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5840/monist19978018

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense

Andrzej Łukasik

Filozofia Nauki•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense

Anto Unt

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2001•1 citation

Common Sense and a “Wigner-Dirac” Approach to Quantum Mechanics

Peter Forrest

The Monist•Jan 1, 1997•2 citations

Revisiting the Applicability of Metaphysical Identity in Quantum Mechanics

Newton C. A. da Costa, Christian DE RONDE

We discuss the hypothesis that the debate about the interpretation of the orthodox formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) might have been misguided right from the start by a biased metaphysical interpretation of the formalism and its inner mathematical relations. In particular, we focus on the orthodox interpretation of the congruence relation, '=', which relates equivalent classes of different mathematical representations of a vector in Hilbert space, in terms of metaphysical identity. We will argue that this seemingly "common sense" interpretation, at the semantic level, has severe difficulties when considering the syntactic level of the theory.

arXiv:1609.05361•Sep 17, 2016•8 citations

Identity and Indiscernibility in Quantum Mechanics

Tomasz Bigaj

New directions in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2022•28 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense

S. V. Gantsevich

A physical picture for Quantum Mechanics which permits to conciliate it with the usual common sense is proposed. The picture agrees with the canonical Copenhagen interpretation making more clear its statements.

arXiv:1609.08427•Sep 19, 2016•0 citations
We discuss the hypothesis that the debate about the interpretation of the orthodox formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) might have been misguided right from the start by a biased metaphysical interpretation of the formalism and its inner mathematical relations. In particular, we focus on the orthodox interpretation of the congruence relation, '=', which relates equivalent classes of different mathematical representations of a vector in Hilbert space, in terms of metaphysical identity. We will argue that this seemingly "common sense" interpretation, at the semantic level, has severe difficulties when considering the syntactic level of the theory.