© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Contractive States and the Standard Quantum Limit for Monitoring Free-Mass Positions"

Robert Lynch

Published May 7, 1984• 16 citations

Abstract

Received 30 January 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1729©1984 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.52.1729

Related papers

Comment on "Contractive States and the Standard Quantum Limit for Monitoring Free-Mass Positions"

K. Wódkiewicz

Received 7 November 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.787©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 27, 1984•11 citations

Comment on "Topological Quantum Effects for Neutral Particles"

Alfred S. Goldhaber

Received 28 January 1988DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.482©1989 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jan 23, 1989•120 citations

Comment on "Microchips as Precision Quantum-Electrodynamic Probes"

Michael A. Stroscio

Received 6 January 1986DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2107©1986 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 12, 1986•10 citations

Contractive States and the Standard Quantum Limit for Monitoring Freemass Positions.

Horace P. Yuen

Physical Review Letters•Oct 24, 1983•8 citations

Repeated Contractive-State Position Measurements and the Standard Quantum Limit

Robert Lynch

It is shown that if the "standard quantum limit" is taken in a predictive sense, then a repeated measurement scheme involving contractive states, recently proposed by Yuen, does not break this limit.Received 23 April 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1599©1985 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 15, 1985•17 citations

Rotational Invariance, Locality, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments

A. O. Barut, Pierre Meystre

Received 2 January 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1021©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 3, 1984•7 citations